Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enhancing Reflection within Situated Learning

Abstract

Designing instruction for situated learning can be challenging, as authentic environments are often unpredictable and vary greatly across situations and discipline. To support situated learners in facing these ill-structured problems and unique environments, it has been suggested that it is essential to develop skills that transfer across environments. The ability to mindfully reflect-in-action is one such skill. This chapter presents the rationale and methods behind the development of a model to use mindfulness as an instructional strategy to enhance learners’ abilities to reflect on their actions within a situated learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alrutz, M., & Stewart, T. (2012). Comparison of the effects of reflection and contemplation activities on service-learners’ cognitive and affective mindfulness. McGill Journal of Education, 47(3), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.7202/1014861ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1992). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1993). Stolen knowledge. Educational Technology, 33(3), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, M. (2011). Mindfulness in higher education. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2011.564838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.-I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 119–136). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaugm Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. J. (2014). Mindfulness in teaching, learning, and leadership: Implications for higher education. Paper presented at the The Clute Institute International Academic Conference, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. M. (1999). Mindful practice. JAMA, 282(9), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, P. H. (2004). Everyday cognition and situated learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton-Deutsch, S., Drew, B. L., & Beck-Coon, K. (2012). Mindful learners. In Reflective practice transforming education and improving outcomes (pp. 79–96). Indianapolis: Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S., Messner, M., & Becker, A. (2009). Reflection and mindfulness in organizations: Rationales and possibilities for integration. Management Learning, 40(4), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life (Vol. Book, Whole). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. Book, Whole). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, H. (1994). Situated learning: Continuing the conversation. Educational Technology, 34(8), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishna, F., & Bogo, M. (2007). Reflective practice in contemporary social work classrooms. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(3), 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, P., Moss, D., Barnes, R., & Wilks, J. (2011). Clear (ing) space: Mindfulness-based reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 12(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzolesi, C., Ghaleb, M., Kostrzewski, A., & Dhillon, S. (2013). Is mindful reflective practice the way forward to reduce medication errors? International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 21(6), 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X016009013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. E., & Lave, J. E. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. Book, Whole). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(92)90005-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership? Educational Technology, 33(3), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Association for Educational Communications and Technology

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stoner, A.M., Cennamo, K.S. (2018). Introduction. In: Enhancing Reflection within Situated Learning. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70326-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70326-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70325-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70326-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics