Skip to main content

Resilient Disaster Recovery: The Role of Health Impact Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Disaster Resilience and Security

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) offer an important way of improving infrastructure decision-making during the post-disaster recovery period. Although increasingly used in support of non-emergency planning decisions HIAs have not yet been widely adapted for disaster recovery contexts. The growing acceptance of broader definitions of health and the setting of future health goals, informed by lay preferences and perspectives as well as expert ones, are assisting the transition to new more holistic policies. Experience in New Jersey, following Hurricane Sandy, provides illustrations of infrastructure impacts and the challenges they pose to local communities. Traditional definitions of physical infrastructure are expanding to include categories like “green infrastructure” and “economic infrastructure”; experts and laypersons are also making different assessments of both the character and the salience of infrastructure needs. Multiple competing priorities for attention by survivors further constraint the degree to which infrastructure issues can be addressed by individual survivors and their families. Opportunities and barriers for the use of HIAs in disaster recovery are identified and explored. The coproduction of policies that capture varieties of knowledge and preferences about infrastructure among experts and laypeople is encouraged.

Governmental organizations … continue to spend heavily on hardening levees, raising existing homes, and repairing damaged facilities despite evidence that social, not physical, infrastructure drives resilience (Aldrich and Meyer 2015).

…although there is growing emphasis on incorporating resilience-building efforts into the recovery process, such efforts tend to focus on hardening critical infrastructure and not on strengthening the health and resiliency of individuals and communities (Institute of Medicine 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Individuals and collectives may be either producers or consumers, depending on the function of the infrastructure system; for example, individuals and families that consume water, electricity etc. also produce waste that is “consumed” by recycling and disposal sinks.

  2. 2.

    New York City’s position as the country’s mass media capital, its status as a world financial hub, its densely populated streets, and its architectural heritage of iconic high-rise buildings all helped to attract media attention. The degree to which New York monopolized public attention is the wake of Sandy is similar to the dominance of New Orleans in accounts of the devastation wreaked by Hurricane Katrina and the low salience of storm-impacted areas in Mississippi and Alabama as well as other places (Lowe and Shaw 2010).

  3. 3.

    Ten local leaders mentioned infrastructure 211 times in open discussions of the experience of Sandy, whereas 45 focus group members mentioned infrastructure 152 times.

  4. 4.

    Uncertainties about infrastructures are clearly implicit in items # 5, 33, 36 but may also be associated with others.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research on which this paper is based was supported by National Science Foundation Grant Award #035241-001-001 and by The Health Impact Project, a joint initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Pew Charitable Trusts. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the Health Impact Project, the Pew Charitable Trusts, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James K. Mitchell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, J.K. (2018). Resilient Disaster Recovery: The Role of Health Impact Assessment. In: Fekete, A., Fiedrich, F. (eds) Urban Disaster Resilience and Security. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics