Abstract
Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) offer an important way of improving infrastructure decision-making during the post-disaster recovery period. Although increasingly used in support of non-emergency planning decisions HIAs have not yet been widely adapted for disaster recovery contexts. The growing acceptance of broader definitions of health and the setting of future health goals, informed by lay preferences and perspectives as well as expert ones, are assisting the transition to new more holistic policies. Experience in New Jersey, following Hurricane Sandy, provides illustrations of infrastructure impacts and the challenges they pose to local communities. Traditional definitions of physical infrastructure are expanding to include categories like “green infrastructure” and “economic infrastructure”; experts and laypersons are also making different assessments of both the character and the salience of infrastructure needs. Multiple competing priorities for attention by survivors further constraint the degree to which infrastructure issues can be addressed by individual survivors and their families. Opportunities and barriers for the use of HIAs in disaster recovery are identified and explored. The coproduction of policies that capture varieties of knowledge and preferences about infrastructure among experts and laypeople is encouraged.
Governmental organizations … continue to spend heavily on hardening levees, raising existing homes, and repairing damaged facilities despite evidence that social, not physical, infrastructure drives resilience (Aldrich and Meyer 2015).
…although there is growing emphasis on incorporating resilience-building efforts into the recovery process, such efforts tend to focus on hardening critical infrastructure and not on strengthening the health and resiliency of individuals and communities (Institute of Medicine 2015).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Individuals and collectives may be either producers or consumers, depending on the function of the infrastructure system; for example, individuals and families that consume water, electricity etc. also produce waste that is “consumed” by recycling and disposal sinks.
- 2.
New York City’s position as the country’s mass media capital, its status as a world financial hub, its densely populated streets, and its architectural heritage of iconic high-rise buildings all helped to attract media attention. The degree to which New York monopolized public attention is the wake of Sandy is similar to the dominance of New Orleans in accounts of the devastation wreaked by Hurricane Katrina and the low salience of storm-impacted areas in Mississippi and Alabama as well as other places (Lowe and Shaw 2010).
- 3.
Ten local leaders mentioned infrastructure 211 times in open discussions of the experience of Sandy, whereas 45 focus group members mentioned infrastructure 152 times.
- 4.
Uncertainties about infrastructures are clearly implicit in items # 5, 33, 36 but may also be associated with others.
References
American Society of Civil Engineers (2016) Report Card for New Jersey’s Infrastructure. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ASCE-Report-Card-for-NJ-Infrastructure-6.16.16.compressed.pdf
Anon (2014) Investing in infrastructure: the trillion-dollar gap. The Economist. March 22
Acharibasam JB, Noble BF (2014) Assessing the impact of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 32(3):177–187
Brown JT (2014) The hurricane sandy rebuilding strategy: in brief. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43396.pdf
Cagney KA, Sterrett D, Benz J, Tompson T (2016) Social resources and community resilience in the wake of superstorm sandy. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160824
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) The different types of Health Assessments. Atlanta. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/types_health_assessments.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Health and safety concerns for all disasters. Atlanta. http://emergency.cdc.gov/disasters/alldisasters.asp
Chang SE (2009) Infrastructure resilience to disasters. Bridge 39(4):36–41
Chang SE, McDaniels T, Fox J, Dhariwal R, Longstaff H (2014) Toward disaster-resilient cities: characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments. Risk Anal 34(3):416–434
Chen J, Hsuan T, Chen Y, Vertinsky I, Yumagulova L, Park C (2013) Public-private partnerships for the development of disaster resilient communities. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 21(3):130–143
Cinderby S, Forrester JM (2016) Co-designing possible flood solutions: participatory mapping methods to identify flood management options from a UK borders study. J Graphic Inf Sci 1:149–156. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/103099/1/B03_EA_10819_Cinderby.pdf
Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Heaton SK, Feldman JD, Rutt CD (2008) Use of health impact assessment in the US: 27 case studies, 1999–2007. Am J Prev Med 34(3):241–256
de Oliveira JAP, Paleo UF (2016) Lost in participation: how local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan. Land Use Policy 52:543–551
Felder FA, Chandramowli S (2016) Impact of extreme events on the electric power sector: challenges, vulnerabilities, institutional responses, and planning implications for hurricane sandy. In: O’Neill K Van Abs D (eds) Taking chances: the coast after hurricane sandy, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 242–257
Finucane ML, Clancy N, Willis HH, Knopman D (2014) The hurricane sandy rebuilding task force’s infrastructure resilience guidelines: an initial assessment of implementation by Federal agencies. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR800/RR841/RAND_RR841.pdf
Gao H, Wang X, Barbier G Liu H (2011) Promoting coordination for disaster relief – from crowdsourcing to coordination. In: Salerno J, Yang SJ, Nau D, Chai SK (eds) Social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction SBP 2011. Lecture notes in computer science, 6589. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 197–204
Grannis J, Arroyo V, Hoverter S, Goetz M, Bennett A, DeWeese J, Zyla K Deas M (2016) Rebuilding with resilience: lessons from the rebuild by design competition after hurricane sandy. Georgetown Climate Center, Washington, DC http://www.rebuildbydesign.org/data/files/504.pdf?mc_cid=9b277f014b&mc_eid=[UNIQID]
Gurian S (2015) Why New Jersey got billions less than New York in FEMA disaster aid after Sandy. NJ Spotlight, July 9. http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/15/07/08/why-new-jersey-got-billions-less-in-fema-sandy-aid-than-new-york/
Haber R (2010) Health Equity Impact Assessment: a Primer. The Wellesley Institute, Toronto. http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Health_Equity_Impact_Assessment_Haber.pdf
Handmer J, Dovers S (2013) Owning the problem: politics, participation and communication. In: Handbook of disaster policies and institutions: improving emergency management and climate change adaptation, 2nd edn. London, pp 69–94
Haworth B, Whittaker J, Bruce E (2016) Assessing the application and value of participatory mapping for community bushfire preparation. Appl Geogr 76:115–127
Hempen E, Ellory M, Shalina V (2016) Building back better and faster: how post-disaster infrastructure rebuilds can become more timely and efficient. The Avenue, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, September 13. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/09/13/building-back-better-and-faster-how-post-disaster-infrastructure-rebuilds-can-become-more-timely-and-efficient/
Homsy GC, Warner ME (2013) Climate change and the co-production of knowledge and policy in rural USA communities. Sociologia Ruralis 53(3):291–310
Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force (2013) Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Strategy: Stronger Communities, a Resilient Region. Washington, DC, August. http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=HSRebuildingStrategy.pdf
Jasanoff S (2004) States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge, London
Kelly S (2015) Estimating economic loss from cascading infrastructure failure: a perspective on modelling interdependency. Infrastructure Complexity 2(7). Published online. September 16. https://infrastructure-complexity.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40551-015-0010-y
Larson L (2009) Infrastructure investment ensuring an effective economic recovery program. Testimony from the Association of State Flood Plain Managers, before the U.S. House of Representatives, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. January 22. http://www.floods.org/PDF/Testimony/ASFPM_Testimony_House_T_and_I_Economic_Stimulus_1-22-09.pdf
Leckner M, McDermott M, Mitchell JK O’Neill K (2016) Local responses to hurricane sandy: heterogeneous experiences and mismatches with Federal Policy. In O’Neill K, Van Abs D (eds) Taking chances: the coast after hurricane sandy, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 208–221
Lowe JS, Shaw TC (2010) After Katrina: racial regimes and the human development barriers in the Gulf Coast Region. Am Q 61(3):803–827
McCormick S (2016) New tools for emergency managers: an assessment of obstacles to use and implementation. Disasters 40(2):207–225
Mendell A (2010) Four types of impact assessment used in Canada: comparative table. National Collaborating Centre for Health Public Policy, Ottawa. http://www.ncchpp.ca/docs/EvaluationImpactComparisonEN.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2015
Mindell J, Ison E, Joffe M (2003) A glossary of health impact assessment. J Epidemiolo Commun Health 57(9):647–651
Mitchell JK (2016) Making healthier decisions about disaster recovery: opportunities for the use of health impact assessments. Report to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Pew Research Trusts. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy. http://phci.rutgers.edu/making-healthier-decisions/
Mitchell JK, O’Neill K, McDermott M, Leckner M (2016) Towards a transformative role of local knowledge in post-disaster recovery: prospects for co-production in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. J Extreme Events 3(1):25
National Academy of Sciences (2012) Disaster resilience: a national Imperative. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2016) Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: table of events. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Environmental Information, Washington, DC https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/events
National Research Council (2011) Improving Health in the United States: The Role of Health Impact assessment. Committee on Health Impact Assessment. National Academies Press, Washington, DC http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Environment/EnvironmentalHealthRT/2011-Nov-RT/132291.pdf
Ostrom E (1996) Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy and development. World Dev 24(6):1073–1087
Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable mitigation. Nat Hazards 28(2):211–228
Pescaroli G, Alexander D (2016) Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards 12 February (published online). http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474646/1/NH2016final.pdf
Pesch-Cronin KA, Marion NE (2016) Critical infrastructure protection, risk management, and resilience. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Pew Charitable Trusts (2015) Health Impact Assessments in the United States. November 4. http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/multimedia/data-visualizations/2015/hia-map
Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F (2013) Advancing theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environ Impact Rev 41:1–9
Preston J, Chadderton C, Kitigawa K Edmonds C (2016) Community response in disasters: an ecological learning framework. Int J Lifelong Edu 34(6):727–753. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02601370.2015.1116116
Public Health England (2007) Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA). HIA Gateway, Association of Public Health Observatories. http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=48174
Renda A (2006) Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels. http://ceps.be/files/book/1291.pdf
Temple J (2017) President Trump takes immediate aim at Obama’s Climate Action Plan. MIT Technology Review, January 20. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603418/president-trump-takes-immediate-aim-at-obamas-climate-action-plan/
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2016) What is critical infrastructure? Washington, DC https://www.dhs.gov/what-critical-infrastructure and https://www.dhs.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors
Van Abs DJ (2016) Water utilities: storm preparedness an restoration. In: O’Neill K, Van Abs D (eds) Taking chances: the coast after hurricane sandy, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 222–241
Wamsler C (2016) From risk governance to city-citizen collaboration: capitalizing on individual adaptation to climate change. Environ Policy Governance 26(3):184–204
Wells KB, Springgate BF, Lizaola E, Jones F, Plough A (2013) Community engagement in disaster preparedness and recovery: a tale of two cities—Los Angeles and New Orleans. Psychiatr Clin North Am 36(3):451–466
Wood M, Kovacs D, Bostrom A, Bridges T, Linkov I (2012) Flood Risk Management: US Army Corps of Engineers and Layperson Perceptions. Risk Anal 32(8):1349–1368
World Bank (2011) Analyzing the social impact of disasters (vol 2). Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, Washington, DC http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEAPREGTOPSOCDEV/Resources/PostDisasterocialAnalysisToolsVolumeI.pdf and http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEAPREGTOPSOCDEV/Resources/PostDisasterSocialAnalysisToolsVolumeII.pdf
Acknowledgments
The research on which this paper is based was supported by National Science Foundation Grant Award #035241-001-001 and by The Health Impact Project, a joint initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Pew Charitable Trusts. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the Health Impact Project, the Pew Charitable Trusts, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, J.K. (2018). Resilient Disaster Recovery: The Role of Health Impact Assessment. In: Fekete, A., Fiedrich, F. (eds) Urban Disaster Resilience and Security. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68605-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68606-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)