Skip to main content

Uncommon Worlds: Toward an Ecological Aesthetics of Childhood in the Anthropocene

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Research Handbook on Childhoodnature

Abstract

In addressing the need for a more robust engagement with aesthetics in posthumanist studies of childhood and nature, this chapter aims to make some tentative steps toward an ecological aesthetics of childhood that is grounded in Whitehead’s speculative philosophy. In doing so, the chapter takes an alternative theoretical approach from much of the “common worlds” scholarship that has emerged in recent years while making the case for a new aesthetics of childhood that is responsive to the accelerating social, technological, and environmental changes of the Anthropocene epoch. Our approach foregrounds the singularity of children’s aesthetic experiences as relational-qualitative “intensities” that alter the fabric of nature as an extensive continuum held in common. We therefore argue that every moment in the life of a child is an uncommon and unrepeatable occasion through which the common world of nature is felt, perceived, and experienced differently. In the second part of the chapter, we use this eco-aesthetic framework to analyze a series of photographs taken by children as part of the Climate Change and Me project, which has mapped children and young people’s affective responses to climate change over a period of 3 years in New South Wales, Australia. Rather than working with images as representations or analogic signifiers for children’s experience, we analyze how each photograph co-implicates children’s bodies and environments through affective vectors of feeling or “prehensions.” In doing so, we actively work to reframe aesthetic notions of image, sensibility, perception, and causality in relational terms while also acknowledging the individuation of childhood experiences as “creaturely becomings” that produce new potentials for environmental thought and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington, MN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaise, M. (2014). Interfering with gendered development: A timely intervention. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(3), 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. A., & Pueblo, S. C. (2010). Contemporary Indigenous education: A nature-centered American Indian philosophy for a 21st century world. Futures, 42(10), 1126–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Rousell, D. (in press-a). Education for What? Shaping the emerging field of climate change education with children and young people as co-researchers. Children’s Geographies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Rousell, D. (in press-b). The mesh of playing and researching in the reality of climate change: Children’s research play spaces. In International research handbook on childhood nature. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A, & Rousell, D. (2014). Climate Change + Me: Children’s and Young People’s Voices in Holocene and Anthropocene Times. Invited symposium presentation at the Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, QUT, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eernstman, N., van Boeckal, J., Sacks, S., & Myers, M. (2012). Inviting the unforeseen: A dialogue about art, learning and sustainability. In A. E. J. Wals & P. B. Corcoran (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 201–212). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S. (2016). Biocultural creatures: Toward a new theory of the human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groys, B. (2008). The topology of contemporary art. In T. Smith, O. Enwezor, & N. Condee (Eds.), Antinomies of art and culture: Modernity, postmodernity and contemporaneity (pp. 71–82). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (2008). The three ecologies. London, England: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. B. (2006). Bodies in code: Interfaces with digital media. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. B. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of 21st century media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Cthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, M. (2012). Sculpting solutions: Art-science collaborations in sustainability. Environment, 54(4), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inwood, H., & Taylor, R. W. (2012). Creative approaches to environmental learning: Two perspectives on teaching environmental art education. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 2(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1998). Intensity: Essay in Whiteheadian ontology. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. (2000). Deleuze and cinema: The aesthetics of sensation. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2013). Childhood and biopolitics: Climate change, life processes and human futures. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N., & Motzkau, J. (2013). Varieties of biosocial imagination: Reframing responses to climate change and antibiotic resistance. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(4), 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment and Society, 6(1), 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2015). Posthumanist approaches to theorising children’s human-nature relations. In K. Nairn, P. Kraftl, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Space, place and environment (pp. 1–22). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(01), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the Act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Gough, A., Gough, N., & Whitehouse, H. (2014). Childrens’ conceptions of nature. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 30(1), 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. G. (2010). Moral spaces, the struggle for an intergenerational environmental ethics and the social ecology of families: An ‘other’ form of environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protevi, J. (2013). Life, war, earth: Deleuze and the sciences. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood: Towards the interdisciplinary study of children. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child–matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2009). Deleuze, whitehead, Bergson: Rhizomatic connections. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousell, D., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Foster, J. (2017). Children of an earth to come: Speculative fiction, geophilosophy, and climate change education research. Educational Studies [special issue on critical and creative approaches to STEM], 53(6), 654–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousell, D., & Fell, F. (2017). Becoming a work of art: Collaboration, materiality and posthumanism in tertiary visual arts education. The International Journal of Education Through Art [special issue on Speculative Realisms in Arts Education], 14(1), 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2015). Discognition. London, England: Repeater Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2017). On the mode of existence of technical objects (C. Malaspina & J. Rogove, Trans). Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M. (2017). The Anthropocene’s call to educational research. In K. Malone, S. Truong, & T. Gray (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability in precarious times (pp. 17–28). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A. (2001). Who drew the sky: Conflicting assumptions in environmental education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2011). Thinking with Whitehead: A free and wild creation of concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1967a). Adventures of ideas. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1967b). Science and the modern world. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1968). Modes of thought. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1985). Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youdell, D. (2017). Bioscience and the sociology of education: The case for biosocial education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Rousell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rousell, D., Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020). Uncommon Worlds: Toward an Ecological Aesthetics of Childhood in the Anthropocene. In: Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_88

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics