Skip to main content

Mediated Behavioural Change in Human-Machine Networks: Exploring Network Characteristics, Trust and Motivation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10540))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Human-machine networks pervade much of contemporary life. Network change is the product of structural modifications and not just participant relations. Taking citizen participation as an example, engagement with relevant stakeholders reveals trust and motivation to be the major objectives for the whole network. Using a typology to describe network state based on multiple characteristic or dimensions, we can predict possible behavioural outcomes in the network. However, this has to be mediated via attitude change rather than material or reputational reward predicted by social exchange models. Motivation for the citizen participation network can only increase in line with enhanced trust. The focus for changing network dynamics, therefore, shifts to the dimensional changes needed to encourage increased trust. It turns out that the coordinated manipulation of multiple dimensions is needed to bring about the desired shift in attitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the terms human-machine network (HMN) and network interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    See https://humane2020.eu/.

  3. 3.

    See https://humane2020.eu/2017/01/16/humane-roadmap-process/.

  4. 4.

    See also [7].

References

  1. Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Meyer, E.T., Pickering, J.B., Engen, V., Walland, P., Lüders, M., Følstad, A., Bravos, G.: Understanding human-machine networks: a cross-disciplinary survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 50 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P.: On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks - WOSN 2009, p. 37. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hellmann, T., Staudigl, M.: Evolution of social networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234, 583–596 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Johnson, J.C.: Analysing Social Networks. SAGE Publications (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vassileva, J.: Motivating participation in social computing applications: a user modeling perspective. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 22, 177–201 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Rashid, A.M., Ling, K., Tassone, R.D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R., Riedl, J.: Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 955–958 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dutt, P.K., Kerikmäe, T.: Concepts and problems associated with eDemocracy. In: Kerikmäe, T. (ed.) Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union, pp. 285–324. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08117-5_13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman, S., Norris, D.F.: A new agenda for e-democracy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Co-operation and Development (OECD): Promise and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. OECD Publishing (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boulianne, S.: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information. Commun. Soc. 18, 524–538 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Panagiotopoulos, P., Sams, S., Elliman, T., Fitzgerald, G.: Do social networking groups support online petitions? Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy 5, 20–31 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loukis, E., Wimmer, M.: A multi-method evaluation of different models of structured electronic consultation on government policies. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29, 284–294 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kreiss, D.: The problem of citizens: E-democracy for actually existing democracy. Soc. Media + Soc. 1, 11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ronson, J.: So You’ve Publically Shamed. Picador, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stott, C., Reicher, S.: Mad Mobs and Englishmen?: Myths and Realities of the 2011 Riots. Robinson, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy 2, 16–30 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M.S.: Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J. Manage. 31, 874–900 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, J., Yoon, Y., Zo, H.: Why people participate in the sharing economy: a social exchange perspective. In: PACIS 2015 Proceedings, vol. 76. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paulini, M., Maher, M.L., Murty, P.: Motivating participation in online innovation communities. Int. J. Web Based Communities 10, 94–114 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eide, A.W., Pickering, J.Brian, Yasseri, T., Bravos, G., Følstad, A., Engen, V., Tsvetkova, M., Meyer, Eric T., Walland, P., Lüders, M.: Human-machine networks: towards a typology and profiling framework. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9731, pp. 11–22. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39510-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Følstad, A., Engen, V., Haugstveit, I.M., Pickering, J.B.: Automation in Human-Machine Networks: How Increasing Machine Agency Affects Human Agency (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pickering, J.B., Engen, V., Walland, P.: The interplay between human and machine agency. In: Kurosu, M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality. HCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10271, pp. 47–59. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58071-5_4

  24. Vassileva, J.: Motivating participation in peer to peer communities. In: Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2002. LNCS, vol. 2577, pp. 141–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/3-540-39173-8_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Engen, V., Pickering, J.Brian, Walland, P.: machine agency in human-machine networks; impacts and trust implications. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9733, pp. 96–106. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39513-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. The Hansard Society: Audit of Political Engagement (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walland, P., Pickering, J.B.: A Roadmap for future human-machine networks for Citizen participation, https://humane2020.eu/2017/06/12/citizen-participation-are-human-machine-networks-the-solution/

  28. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709–734 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 344–354 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 393–404 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McKnight, D.H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J.B., Clay, P.F.: Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2, 12 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thatcher, J.B., McKnight, D.H., Baker, E.W., Arsal, R.E., Roberts, N.H.: The role of trust in postadoption it exploration: an empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 58, 56–70 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., West, R.: The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6, 42 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Batson, C.D.: In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 20, pp. 65–122. Academic Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dickerson, P.: Social Psychology: Traditional and Critical Perspectives. Pearson Education (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Brian Pickering .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Walland, P., Brian Pickering, J. (2017). Mediated Behavioural Change in Human-Machine Networks: Exploring Network Characteristics, Trust and Motivation. In: Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10540. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67256-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics