Skip to main content

The DELPHI Microvertex Detector at LEP

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution of Silicon Sensor Technology in Particle Physics

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Modern Physics ((STMP,volume 275))

  • 1658 Accesses

Abstract

In the Large Electron and Positron (LEP) collider era, quark tagging and spectroscopy of short-lived particles demanded high-precision tracking with flavour tagging possibilities via the second vertex identification method. Taking the success of silicon sensors in NA11 (see Sect. 3.2) and MARKII [193] into account, silicon was the obvious candidate for the innermost tracking detector complemented by drift chambers and/or time projection chambers at larger radii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    DELPHI followed the example of ALEPH, which started right away with double-sided silicon sensors.

  2. 2.

    Heavy quarks from e.g. \(J/\varPsi \) containing a c quark or the \(\varUpsilon \) meson containing \({b\bar{b}}\).

  3. 3.

    The track does not pass through the primary vertex.

  4. 4.

    Rz IP resolution is given for perpendicular tracks, since the point resolution (inclined tracks) as well as the amount of material strongly depends on \(\varTheta \) for the z-coordinate

  5. 5.

    The \(W^{+}W^-\) production cross-section close to threshold energies is a few picobarns only, thus the expected event rate is relatively small and a high detection efficiency is necessary.

  6. 6.

    The “horizontal” planes face each other, therefore strips are oriented \(\pm 2^\circ \).

  7. 7.

    Noise distributions around pinholes looked like a high mountain range and the occurrence was called “Mt. Fuji”.

  8. 8.

    Fortunately, there were not too many such cases.

  9. 9.

    Thermal noise from parallel resistances is proportional to the shaping time, thus crucial for LEP operations. In addition the modules daisy-chain up to four sensors. The parallel arrangement of \(R_{poly}\) decreases effective resistance (see Sect. 1.5).

  10. 10.

    \(p^+\)-stops was the common configuration; the \(p^+\)-spray technique was developed later.

  11. 11.

    n-side is more noisy, e.g. due to the higher load capacitance.

  12. 12.

    Triggering on \(\gamma s\) is not possible, but with a strong source and an integration time of \(2\,\upmu \mathrm{s}\) a readout frequency of about 3 Hz without trigger was achieved – enough for calibration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Hartmann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartmann, F. (2017). The DELPHI Microvertex Detector at LEP. In: Evolution of Silicon Sensor Technology in Particle Physics. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, vol 275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64436-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics