Skip to main content

The IPE Puzzle of Regional Inequality, Instability, and the Global Insertion of South America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regionalism, Development and the Post-Commodities Boom in South America

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

This introductory chapter sets the case of why the IPE of the unstable structures of South American regional development in their uneven links with the global order following the decline of the commodities boom is central to understanding Global South America as a region. Its central discussion is to comprehend analytically whether scholars must follow either the long circle of commodities and/or the historical political structures of unequal development and international insertion. In doing so, the chapter argues in favor of a new IPE research agenda that recovers the central features of the LA contributions based upon the historical regional characteristics, the study of inequality, political instability, diverse regional economic configurations, and international insertions. The chapter sets the theoretical and methodological framework of a LA IPE to the study of the Global South.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acharya, A. 2011. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (3): 619–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Regionalism Beyond EU-Centrism. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, ed. Tanja A. Borzel and T. Risse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astorga, P. 2015. Functional Inequality in Latin America: News from the Twentieth Century. Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, L., and J.A. Ocampo. 2012. El desarrollo económico de América Latina desde la independencia. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås, M., and D. McNeill, eds. 2004. Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås, M., M. Marchand, and T. Shaw, eds. 2005. The Political Economy of Regions and Regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla, A., and G. Long. 2010. Un nuevo regionalismo sudamericano. Íconos: revista de Ciencias Sociales 38: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. 1979. Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceño-Ruiz, J. 2007. La integración regional en América Latina y el Caribe. Procesos históricos y realidades comparadas. Caracas: Centro Editorial Litorama.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Autonomía: genealogía y desarrollo de un concepto. Su relación con el regionalismo en América Latina. Cuadernos Sobre Relaciones Internacionales, Regionalismo Y Desarrollo 9 (18): 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer-Thomas, V. 2003. The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. 1982. The Role of Theory in Field Research. In Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual, ed. R. Burgess, 209–212. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2000. International System in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. 1967. The Twenty Years’ Crisis. New York: Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord, L. et al. 2014. Inequality Stagnation in Latin America in the Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. Word Bank. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/908771468088775560/Inequality-stagnation-in-Latin-America-in-the-aftermath-of-the-global-financial-crisis

  • Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R., and M. Schechter, eds. 2002. The Political Economy of a Plural World: Critical Reflections on Power, Morals and Civilizations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ferranti, D., G. Perry, F. Ferreira, and M. Walton. 2004. Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean: Breaking with History? Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Lombaerde, P., and F. Söderbaum, eds. 2014. Regionalism. Belgium: SAGE – UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deciancio, M. 2016. International Relations from the South: A Regional Research Agenda for Global IR. International Studies Review 18 (1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K., S. Burrell, and R. Kann. 1958. Political Community in the North Atlantic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars. The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitru, A. et al. 2015. Latin America After the Commodity Boom. Rabobank. Available at: https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2015/september/latin-america-after-the-commodity-boom/

  • Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight. 2013. The End of International Relations Theory? European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estay, J., and G. Sánchez (coord). 2005. El ALCA y sus peligros para América Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estevadeordal, A., and K. Suominen. 2007. Sequencing Regional Trade and Cooperation Agreements. Internal Paper. Washington: Integration and Regional Programs Department, Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconi, F. 2014. Al Sur de las decisiones: Enfrentando la crisis del siglo XXI. Quito: El Conejo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankema, E. 2009. Has Latin America Always Been Unequal? A Comparative Analysis of Asset and Income Inequality in the Long Twenty Century. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A., and A. Payne. 1996. Regionalism and World Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini, Leonardo, and Nora Lustig. 2011. The Rise and Fall of Income Inequality in Latin America, 27. Buenos Aires: Universidad de La Plata, ECINEQ WP/CEDLAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith-Jones, S. 1984. International Finance and Latin America. New York: St. Martin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and International Organization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin Donghi, T. 1995. The Contemporary History of Latin America. London: Duke University Press, Fourth Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., and A. Payne. 2013. The Great Uncertainty. In SPERI Paper No 5, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., and F. Söderbaum. 2000. Theorising the Rise of Regionness. New Political Economy 5 (3): 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., A. Inotai, and O. Sunkel, eds. 1999. Globalism and the New Regionalism. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgott, R. 2006. The Theory and Practice of Region. In Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence or Divergence, ed. B. Fort and D. Webber, 17–38. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawn, E. 1998. Fractured Times: Culture and Society in the Twentieth Century. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, J. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaletsky, A. 2017. Trumping Capitalism? Available at: https://www.projectsyndicate.org/onpoint/trumping-capitalism-by-anatole-kaletsky-201701?barrier= accessreg

  • Katzenstein, P. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., R. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing in Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombaerde, P. 2016. Theorizing Latin American Regionalism in the 21st Century. IN Federalisme Regionalisme 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhnow, D. 2014. The Two Latin Americas. A Continental Divide Between One Bloc That Favors State Controls and Another That Embraces Free Markets. The Wall Street Journal. New York, January 3. that.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, N., L. Lopez-Calva, and E. Ortiz-Juarez 2012. Declining Inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: The Cases of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Working Papers 307, CGDEV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makram, H. 2006. How “International” Are Theories in International Relations? The View from Latin America. San Diego: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A. 2011. Conceptos, teorías y debates sobre la integración regional. Norteamérica 6,2 (6–12): 219–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A., and G. Gardini. 2012. Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and Its Lessons. The International Spectator 47–1 (3): 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. 1966. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M., and J. Gustafsson, eds. 2012. Latin America Responses to Globalization in the 21st Century. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nossel, S. 2016. The World’s Rising Powers Have Fallen. Available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/06/brics-brazil-india-russia-china-south-africa-economics-recession/

  • Ocampo, A. 2012. The Economic Development of Latin America Since the Independence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. 2003. National Inequality in the Era of Globalization: What Do Recent Data Tell Us? In The Handbook of Globalization, ed. J. Michie. Cheltenham: Edward Alan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. 2005. The Global Politics of Unequal Development. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2012. The Rise and Demise of Extractive Capitalism. Available at: http://petras.lahaine.org/?p=1895.

  • Polanyi, K. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiliconi, C. 2014. Competitive Diffusion of Trade Agreements in Latin America. International Studies Review 16 (2): 240–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiliconi, C., S. Kingah, and M. Soko. 2015. BRICS Leadership at the Regional and Global Level: Disposition, Capacity and Legitimacy in a Multipolar Era. London/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. 2009. Forgotten Continent: The Battle for Latin American Soul. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, P., and D. Tussie. 2012. The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. London/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saguier, M., and Z. Brent. 2015. Regionalismo y Economı´a Social y Solidaria en Suramérica. Estudios Internacionales 48: 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado Espinoza, Raúl. 2017. Region-Engaging Small States in the Construction of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR): The Cases of Ecuador and Uruguay. Quito: Flacso-Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J.A. 2010. La construcción de una región: Suramérica y el regionalismo posliberal. Una región en construcción. UNASUR y la integración en América del Sur, 87–136. Madrid: Fundación CIDOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Post-liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNASUR. EUI Working Papers (Global Governance Program).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 2005. The Global City: Introducing a Concept. The Brown Journal of World Affairs 11 (2): 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Global City: Enabling Economic Intermediation and Bearing the Cost. City and Community 15 (2): 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. 1988. Africa Renaissance/African Alliance: Towards New Regionalism and New Realism in the Great Lakes a the Start of the Twenty-First Century. Politeia 17 (3): 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. New Regionalism in Africa in the New Millennium: Comparative Perspectives on Renaissance, Realism and/or Regressions. New Political Economy 5 (3): 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. 2006. Can It Be Home-Grown? Challenges to Developing IR Theory in the Global South. San Diego: Paper Presented to the 47ht Annual Conference of the International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. 2000. Theorising the Rise of Regionness. New Political.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Introduction: Theories of New Regionalism. In Theories of New Regionalism, ed. F. Söderbaum and T. Shaw, 1–21. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Conceptualizing Region, Regionalism and Regionalization. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. What’s Wrong with Regional Integration? The Problem of Eurocentrism. Working Papers No. 64, RSCAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., and T. Shaw. 2003. Theories of New Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. 2008. Neoliberal Institutionalism. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. C.H. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, 201–221. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svampa, M. 2013. Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en Latín América. Revista Nueva Sociedad 244: 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. 2005. The Logic of Disorder: ‘Malignant Regionalization’ in Central Africa. In The Political Economy of Regions and Regionalisms, ed. M. Bøås, M.H. Marchand, and T. Shaw. Hampshire: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. China’s New Role in Africa. New York: Lynne Rienner Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, R. 2012. A Historical Perspective on the Political Economy of Inequality in Latin America. In Latin American Political Economy, ed. J. Santiso and J. Dayton-Johnson, 149–167. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A. 2003. Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives 4 (4): 325–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A., and D. Blaney. 2013. Claiming the International. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A., and O. Waever. 2009. International Relations Scholarship Around the World. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrent, R. 2003. Regional Integration Instruments and Dimensions: An Analytical Framework. In Bridges for Development: Policies and Institutions for Trade and Integration, ed. R. Devlin and A. Estevadeordal, 119–135. Washington, DC: Inter American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussie, D. 2003. Theories of New Regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Relaciones Internacionales y Economía Política Internacional: Notas para el Debate. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales 24 (48): 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. 2014. Human Development Report. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf

  • Wallerstein, E. 2004. World System Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, F. 2000. Latin America in the World Economy: Mercantile Colonialism to Global Capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2015. Despite the End of the Commodity Boom, African Countries Can Sustain Their Economic Rise. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/04/21/despite-the-end-of-the-commodity-boom-african-countries-can-sustain-their-economic-rise

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vivares, E. (2018). The IPE Puzzle of Regional Inequality, Instability, and the Global Insertion of South America. In: Vivares, E. (eds) Regionalism, Development and the Post-Commodities Boom in South America. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62551-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics