Skip to main content

C_AssesSeg Concurrent Computing Version of AssesSeg: A Benchmark Between the New and Previous Version

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10407))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2607 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents the capabilities of a command line tool (.exe) created to assess the quality of segmented digital images. The executable source code, called AssesSeg (Assess Segmentation), was written in Python 2.7 using only open source libraries. AssesSeg implements a modified version of the supervised discrepancy measure named Euclidean Distance 2 (ED2) and was tested on different satellite images (Sentinel-2, Landsat 8, WorldView-2 and WorldView-3). The segmentation was applied to plastic covered greenhouse detection in the south of Spain (Almería). AssesSeg 2.0 was compared with the previous version computing time. The comparisons showed how the new version can benefit from modern multi-core CPU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blaschke, T.: Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 65(1), 2–16 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blaschke, T., Hay, G.J., Kelly, M., Lang, S., Hofmann, P., Addink, E., Feitosa, R.Q., van der Meer, F., van der Werff, H., van Coillie, F., et al.: Geographic object-based image analysis-towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 87, 180–191 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caprioli, M., Tarantino, E.: Identification of land cover alterations in the Alta Murgia National Park (Italy) with VHR satellite imagery. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plann. 1(3), 261–270 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pu, R., Landry, S., Yu, Q.: Object-based urban detailed land cover classification with high spatial resolution Ikonos imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 32(12), 3285–3308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stumpf, A., Kerle, N.: Object-oriented mapping of landslides using random forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 115(10), 2564–2577 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Figorito, B., Tarantino, E., Balacco, G., Fratino, U.: An object-based method for mapping ephemeral river areas from WorldView-2 satellite data. In: SPIE Remote Sensing, International Society for Optics and Photonics, p. 85310B (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández, I., Aguilar, F.J., Aguilar, M.A., Álvarez, M.F.: Influence of data source and training size on impervious surface areas classification using VHR satellite and aerial imagery through an object-based approach. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 7(12), 4681–4691 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaofan, W., Jinsong, D., Ke, W., Ligang, M., Tahmassebi, A.R.S.: Object-based classification approach for greenhouse mapping using Landsat-8 imagery. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 9(1), 79 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fan, J., Yau, D.K., Elmagarmid, A.K., Aref, W.G.: Automatic image segmentation by integrating color-edge extraction and seeded region growing. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(10), 1454–1466 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Marpu, P., Neubert, M., Herold, H., Niemeyer, I.: Enhanced evaluation of image segmentation results. J. Spat. Sci. 55(1), 55–68 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Witharana, C., Civco, D.L.: Optimizing multi-resolution segmentation scale using empirical methods: exploring the sensitivity of the supervised discrepancy measure Euclidean Distance 2 (ED2). ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 87, 108–121 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Novelli, A., Aguilar, M.A., Nemmaoui, A., Aguilar, F.J., Tarantino, E.: Performance evaluation of object based greenhouse detection from Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat 8 OLI data: a case study from Almería (Spain). Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 52, 403–411 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drăguţ, L., Csillik, O., Eisank, C., Tiede, D.: Automated parameterisation for multi-scale image segmentation on multiple layers. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 88, 119–127 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belgiu, M., Drguţ, L.: Comparing supervised and unsupervised multiresolution segmentation approaches for extracting buildings from very high resolution imagery. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 96, 67–75 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neubert, M., Herold, H., Meinel, G.: Assessing image segmentation quality-concepts, methods and application. In: Blaschk, T., Lang, S., Hay, G.J. (eds.) Object-Based Image Analysis, pp. 769–784. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Tong, H., Maxwell, T., Zhang, Y., Dey, V.: A supervised and fuzzy-based approach to determine optimal multi-resolution image segmentation parameters. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 78(10), 1029–1044 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baatz, M., Schäpe, A., et al.: Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung XII 58, 12–23 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tian, J., Chen, D.M.: Optimization in multi-scale segmentation of high-resolution satellite images for artificial feature recognition. Int. J. Remote Sens. 28(20), 4625–4644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarantino, E., Figorito, B.: Mapping rural areas with widespread plastic covered vineyards using true color aerial data. Remote Sens. 4(7), 1913–1928 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drguţ, L., Tiede, D., Levick, S.R.: ESP: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 24(6), 859–871 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Novelli, A., Aguilar, M.A., Aguilar, F.J., Nemmaoui, A., Tarantino, E.: Assessega command line tool to quantify image segmentation quality: a test carried out in Southern Spain from satellite imagery. Remote Sens. 9(1), 40 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Y., Bian, L., Meng, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, S., Yang, Y., Shao, X., Wang, B.: Discrepancy measures for selecting optimal combination of parameter values in object-based image analysis. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 68, 144–156 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aguilar, M.A., Aguilar, F., García Lorca, A., Guirado, E., Betlej, M., Cichon, P., Nemmaoui, A., Vallario, A., Parente, C.: Assessment of multiresolution segmentation for extracting greenhouses from WorldView-2 imagery. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 145–152 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aguilar, M.A., Nemmaoui, A., Novelli, A., Aguilar, F.J., García Lorca, A.: Object-based greenhouse mapping using very high resolution satellite data and Landsat 8 time series. Remote Sens. 8(6), 513 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aguilar, M.A., Novelli, A., Nemamoui, A., Aguilar, F.J., García Lorca, A., González-Yebra, Ó.: Optimizing multiresolution segmentation for extracting plastic greenhouses from WorldView-3 imagery. In: De Pietro, G., Gallo, L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-IIMSS 2017. SIST, vol. 76, pp. 31–40. Springer, Cham (2018). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59480-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Cauwenbergh, N., Pinte, D., Tilmant, A., Frances, I., Pulido-Bosch, A., Vanclooster, M.: Multi-objective, multiple participant decision support for water management in the Andarax catchment, Almeria. Environ. Geol. 54(3), 479–489 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giordano, R., Milella, P., Portoghese, I., Vurro, M., Apollonio, C., D’Agostino, D., Lamaddalena, N., Scardigno, A., Piccinni, A.: An innovative monitoring system for sustainable management of groundwater resources: objectives, stakeholder acceptability and implementation strategy. In: 2010 IEEE Workshop on Environmental Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS), pp. 32–37. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Giordano, R., DAgostino, D., Apollonio, C., Scardigno, A., Pagano, A., Portoghese, I., Lamaddalena, N., Piccinni, A.F., Vurro, M.: Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies. Agric. Water Manag. 147, 54–66 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aguilar, M., Agüera, F., Aguilar, F., Carvajal, F.: Geometric accuracy assessment of the orthorectification process from very high resolution satellite imagery for common agricultural policy purposes. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29(24), 7181–7197 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aguilar, M.A., Nemmaoui, A., Aguilar, F.J., Novelli, A., García Lorca, A.: Improving georeferencing accuracy of very high resolution satellite imagery using freely available ancillary data at global coverage. Int. J. Digit. Earth 1–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muller-Wilm, U., Louis, J., Richter, R., Gascon, F., Niezette, M.: Sentinel-2 level 2a prototype processor: architecture, algorithms and first results. In: Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 9–13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Townshend, J.R., Justice, C.O., Gurney, C., McManus, J.: The impact of misregistration on change detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 30(5), 1054–1060 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Barzaghi, R., Carrion, D., Pepe, M., Prezioso, G.: Computing the deflection of the vertical for improving aerial surveys: a comparison between EGM2008 and ITALGEO05 estimates. Sensors 16(8), 1168 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) and the European Union FEDER funds (Grant Reference AGL2014-56017-R). It takes part of the general research lines promoted by the Agrifood Campus of International Excellence ceiA3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eufemia Tarantino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Novelli, A., Aguilar, M.A., Aguilar, F.J., Nemmaoui, A., Tarantino, E. (2017). C_AssesSeg Concurrent Computing Version of AssesSeg: A Benchmark Between the New and Previous Version. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10407. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62400-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62401-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics