Abstract
We use the lens of ‘institutional work’ to explore the implementation of innovative projects within the NHS in England, designed to improve access to primary care services. We report a qualitative process evaluation of their implementation. We highlight the conflicting institutional logics at work across the field, and provide some examples of ‘creating’ and ‘disrupting’ institutional work required to bridge them. We explore the enabling conditions which may have allowed our participants to temporarily transgress the institutional constraints within which they worked. We provide evidence which may be of practical use for those seeking to innovate in this way, and ask whether or not these micro-level acts of creation and disruption may, in the longer term, accumulate towards wider institutional change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Battilana, J. (2011). The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK national health service. Organization Science, 22(4), 817–834.
Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Lewis, S., Saul, J. E., Carroll, S., & Bitz, J. (2012). Large-system transformation in health care: A realist review. Millbank Quarterly, 90(3), 421–456.
Bostock, N. (2015). NHS England reveals £200m ‘vanguard’ areas trialling NHS integration. GP Online. Retrieved from http://www.gponline.com/nhs-england-reveals-200m-vanguard-areas-trialling-nhs-integration/article/1337555. Accessed 30 May 2017.
Caronna, C. A. (2004). The misalignment of institutional ‘pillars’: Consequences for the U.S. health care field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 45–58.
Checkland, K., Harrison, S., et al. (2012). Commissioning in the English national health service: What’s the problem? Journal of Social Policy, 41(03), 533–550.
Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (1989). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.
Currie, W. L., & Guah, M. W. (2007). Conflicting institutional logics: A national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 235–247.
Department of Health. (2006). Health reform in England: Update and next steps. London: The Stationery Office.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416.
Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Health and Social Care Act. (2012). Department of Health.
Hodgson, D., Anselmi, L., et al. (2015). NHS Greater Manchester Primary Care demonstrator evaluation. Greater Manchester: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health and Care Research.
Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398–422.
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., et al. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.
Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., et al. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033.
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., et al. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies. London: Sage.
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., et al. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, R., & Gillam, S. (2003). Back to the market: Yet more reform of the National Health Service. International Journal of Health Services, 33(1), 77–84.
Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313–333.
Macfarlane, F., Exworthy, M., et al. (2011). Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose: senior NHS managers’ narratives of restructuring. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(6), 914–929.
NHS England. (2014). Five year forward view. London: NHS England.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Insititutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Secretary of State for Health. (2000). The NHS plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: The Stationery Office.
Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., et al. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements
This study is based on research carried out for a project funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Greater Manchester and by NHS England (Greater Manchester). The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. We are grateful to the participants who gave freely of their time, and to the wider project team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Checkland, K., Parkin, S., Bailey, S., Hodgson, D. (2018). Institutional Work and Innovation in the NHS: The Role of Creating and Disrupting. In: McDermott, A., Kitchener, M., Exworthy, M. (eds) Managing Improvement in Healthcare. Organizational Behaviour in Health Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62235-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62235-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62234-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62235-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)