Skip to main content

Institutional Work and Innovation in the NHS: The Role of Creating and Disrupting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Improvement in Healthcare

Part of the book series: Organizational Behaviour in Health Care ((OBHC))

Abstract

We use the lens of ‘institutional work’ to explore the implementation of innovative projects within the NHS in England, designed to improve access to primary care services. We report a qualitative process evaluation of their implementation. We highlight the conflicting institutional logics at work across the field, and provide some examples of ‘creating’ and ‘disrupting’ institutional work required to bridge them. We explore the enabling conditions which may have allowed our participants to temporarily transgress the institutional constraints within which they worked. We provide evidence which may be of practical use for those seeking to innovate in this way, and ask whether or not these micro-level acts of creation and disruption may, in the longer term, accumulate towards wider institutional change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Battilana, J. (2011). The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK national health service. Organization Science, 22(4), 817–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Lewis, S., Saul, J. E., Carroll, S., & Bitz, J. (2012). Large-system transformation in health care: A realist review. Millbank Quarterly, 90(3), 421–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, N. (2015). NHS England reveals £200m ‘vanguard’ areas trialling NHS integration. GP Online. Retrieved from http://www.gponline.com/nhs-england-reveals-200m-vanguard-areas-trialling-nhs-integration/article/1337555. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Caronna, C. A. (2004). The misalignment of institutional ‘pillars’: Consequences for the U.S. health care field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, K., Harrison, S., et al. (2012). Commissioning in the English national health service: What’s the problem? Journal of Social Policy, 41(03), 533–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (1989). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. L., & Guah, M. W. (2007). Conflicting institutional logics: A national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2006). Health reform in England: Update and next steps. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Social Care Act. (2012). Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D., Anselmi, L., et al. (2015). NHS Greater Manchester Primary Care demonstrator evaluation. Greater Manchester: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health and Care Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., et al. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., et al. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., et al. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., et al. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R., & Gillam, S. (2003). Back to the market: Yet more reform of the National Health Service. International Journal of Health Services, 33(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, F., Exworthy, M., et al. (2011). Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose: senior NHS managers’ narratives of restructuring. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(6), 914–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. (2014). Five year forward view. London: NHS England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Insititutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for Health. (2000). The NHS plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., et al. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is based on research carried out for a project funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Greater Manchester and by NHS England (Greater Manchester). The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. We are grateful to the participants who gave freely of their time, and to the wider project team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kath Checkland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Checkland, K., Parkin, S., Bailey, S., Hodgson, D. (2018). Institutional Work and Innovation in the NHS: The Role of Creating and Disrupting. In: McDermott, A., Kitchener, M., Exworthy, M. (eds) Managing Improvement in Healthcare. Organizational Behaviour in Health Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62235-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics