Abstract
A conceptualization of the research or evaluation as described in Chapters. 2 and 3 provides the basis for operationalizing the PIO MM for intervention effectiveness research, quality improvement activities, and program evaluation. This operationalization requires measures, data, and software. In this chapter, checklists for obtaining new or existing data for operationalizing PIO MM are provided for two situations, new data that will be collected prospectively, and reusing existing data. Nursing’s robust standardized terminologies are described, with emphasis on the Omaha System as an exemplar for all terminologies. Use of large datasets is described, and their unique contribution to the examination of interventions and outcomes is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K (2013) Big data – a revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. John Murray Publishers, London
Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K (2009) The fourth paradigm: data intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Schneeweiss S (2014) Learning from big health care data. N Engl J Med 370(23):2161–2163
Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V (2014) Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst 2(1):3
Kruse CS, Goswamy R, Raval Y, Marawi S (2016) Challenges and opportunities of big data in health care: a systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 4(4)
Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Olsen L, McGinnis JM (2010) Redesigning the clinical effectiveness research paradigm: innovation and practice-based approaches: workshop summary. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Jensen PB, Jensen LJ, Brunak S (2012) Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 13(6):395–405
Martin KS (2005) The Omaha System: a key to practice, documentation, and information management, reprinted 2nd edn. Health Connections Press, Omaha, NE
Werley HH (1991) Nursing minimum data: abstract tool for standardized comparable, essential data. Am J Public Health 81(4):421–426. doi:10.2105/AJPH.81.4.421
Sewell JP, Thede LQ. Nursing and informatics: opportunities and challenges. Nursing documentation in the age of the EHR [Internet], 2012. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://dlthede.net/informatics/Chap16Documentation/chap16.html
American Nurses Association [ANA]. ANA recognized terminologies that support nursing practice [Internet], 2012. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Tools/Recognized-Nursing-Practice-Terminologies.pdf
Huber D, Delaney C (1997) The American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE) research column. The nursing management minimum data set. Appl Nurs Res 10:164–165
Marucci AR, De Caro W, Petrucci C, Lancia L, Sansoni J (2015) ICNP-International Classification of Nursing Practice: origin, structure and development. Prof Inferm 68(2):131
Butcher HK, Bulechek GM, Dochterman JM, Wagner C (2013) Nursing interventions classification (NIC). Elsevier Health Sciences
Clinical care classification [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: https://www.sabacare.com/about/
Nielsen K, Randall R (2013) Opening the black box: presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. Eur J Work Organ Psy 22(5):601–617
Herdman TH (ed) (2011) Nursing diagnoses 2012-14: definitions and classification. John Wiley & Sons
Moorhead S (2013) Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). Elsevier Health Sciences
Johnson M (ed) (2001) Nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions: NANDA, NOC, and NIC linkages. Mosby Incorporated
Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [US] (1999) Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 48(RR11):1–40
Röhrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Kwiecien R, Blettner M (2010) Sample size calculation in clinical trials: part 13 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int 107(31-32):552
Mendenhall W, Beaver RJ, Beaver BM (2012) Introduction to probability and statistics. Cengage Learning
Green SB, Salkind NJ (2010) Using SPSS for windows and Macintosh: analyzing and understanding data. Prentice Hall Press
SAS University edition [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12] Available from: http://www.sas.com/en_us/software/university-edition.html
IBM® SPSS® Student GradPack [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/spss-stats-gradpack
What is R? [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/about.html
Tiwari V, Tiwari B, Thakur RS, Gupta S (2013) Pattern and data analysis in healthcare settings. Google Books
Weka Project http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/index.html
Frank E, Hall MA, Witten IH (2016) The WEKA workbench. In: Online Appendix for “Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques”, 4th edn. Morgan Kaufmann
MATLAB [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/features.html#matlab-speaks-math
D3 data driven documents [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: https://d3js.org/
What is Tableau? [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: http://www.tableau.com/products/desktop#TGETWeLmfvacBMZt.99
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monsen, K.A. (2018). Tools for Intervention Effectiveness Research, Quality Improvement Activities, and Program Evaluation. In: Intervention Effectiveness Research: Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61246-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61246-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61245-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61246-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)