Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender and Precarious Work

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics

Abstract

Precarious work and gender is a relatively underexplored topic. Understanding why women are disproportionately affected by precarious work is an integral part of the overall discussion on the position of women in the labor market and in the society as a whole. The main aim of the chapter is to explore some of the issues that particularly affect women in low skilled jobs by focusing on the more disadvantaged groups of migrant and undocumented migrant workers. This discussion is based on secondary data consisting of policy documents, research project reports, and academic books and journal articles. There is brief focus on three thematic areas: informal work; an intersectional approach to women’s precarity; and last but not least, the question of skills. The three themes have been selected because they interact with one another and they also cover some of the main issues experienced by migrant women in precarious employment. The chapter argues that there is scope for further research on the precariousness of women against the backdrop of an increasing casualization of more “secure” jobs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson B (2007) A very private business: exploring the demand for migrant domestic workers. Eur J Women’s Stud 14(3):247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B (2010) Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, employment and society 24(2):300–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Avril C, Cartier M (2014) Subordination in home service jobs: Comparing providers of home-based child care, elder care, and cleaning in France. Gender & Society 28(4):609–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier J (2011) ‘Employment precariousness in a European cross-national perspective – a sociological view over 30 years of research’, Presented at the May 2011 seminar, De-standardisation of employment, Koln University. 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier J, Brygoo A, Viguier F (2002) Defining and assessing precarious employment in Europe: a review of main studies and surveys – a tentative approach to precarious employment in France. ESCOPE Project Precarious Employment in Europe: A Comparative Study of Labour Market related Risks in Flexible Economies

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri D, Janeckova H, Karu M, Luminari D, Madarova Z, Paats M, Reingardė, J (2017) Gender, skills and precarious work in the EU, Research note, European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard H, Collingwood A, Wenham A, Smith E, Drake B, Leese D, Kumar A (2018) UK poverty 2018. York: JRF

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1994) Human Capital A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell DNF, Blanchflower DG (2018) Underemployment and the lack of wage pressure in the UK. Natl Inst Econ Rev 243(1):R53–R61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell N (2019) EU Equality Law and Precarious Work in Uladzislau Belavusau and Kristin Henrard (eds.), EU Anti-Discrimination Law Beyond Gender, Hart: Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti E (2016) Gender and Precarious Labor in a Historical Perspective: Italian Women and Precarious Work between Fordism and Post-Fordism. International Labor and Working-Class History 89:64–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti E (2018) Historicizing precarious work: forty years of research in the social sciences and humanities. Int Rev Soc Hist 63(2):273–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch A, McKay S (2017) Living on the Margins: Undocumented Migrants in a Global City. Bristol: Policy Press, 2017. IV, 224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch A, Sigona N, Zetter R (2012) Migration routes and strategies of young undocumented migrants in England: a qualitative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34(8):1286–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobek A, Pembroke S, Wickham J (2018) Social implications of precarious work. TASC, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch G (2004) Towards a New Standard Employment Relationship in Western Europe’ British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42:4 December 2004 0007–1080 pp. 617–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1998) Acts of resistance: against the new myths of our time. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch EH, Hanley H (2017) A racial-gender lens on precarious nonstandard employment. Res Sociol Work 31:183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton A, Biletta I, Kullander (2010) Flexible forms of work: ‘very atypical’ contractual arrangements, EF/10/10/EN, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, March 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton A, Green M, Rickard R, Swift S, Eichhorst W, Tobsch V, Magda I, Lewandowski P, Keister R, Jonaviciene D, Ramos Martin N E, Valsamis D, Tros F (2016) Precarious employment in Europe: patterns, trends and policy strategies, European Parliament

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell I, Price R (2016) Precarious work and precarious workers: towards an improved conceptualisation. Econ Labour Relat Rev 27(3):314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304616652074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Countouris N (2019) Defining and regulating work relations for the future of work. International Labour Organisation

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtois A, O’Keefe T (2019) ‘Not one of the family’: Gender and precarious work in the neoliberal university. Gender Work and Organization, 26(4):463–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranford C, Vosko LF, Zukewich N (2003) The Gender of Precariousness in the Canadian Labour Force. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 58(3):454–482

    Google Scholar 

  • De Paolo M, Brunello G (2016) Education as a tool for the economic integration of migrants, EENEE Analytical Report No. 27, Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis N, MacDonald P, Bozani V, Chiotis V (2017) Inclusive recruitment? Hiring discrimination against older workers, GLO Discussion Paper Series 103, Global Labor Organization (GLO)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2017) Working conditions and precarious employment. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0290_EN.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2020

  • Fantone L (2007) Precarious changes: gender and generational politics in contemporary Italy. Feminist Review, No. 87, Italian Feminisms (2007), pp. 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Finotelli C, Arango J (2011) Regularisation of unauthorised immigrants in Italy and Spain: determinants and effects. Doc Anàl Geogr 57(3):495–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge J (2016) A New Vocabulary and Imaginary for Labour Law: Taking Legal Constitution, Gender, and Social Reproduction Seriously. In: Brodie D, Nicole B, Busby, Zahn R (eds) The Future Regulation of Work: New Concepts, New Paradigms. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge J, Owens R (eds) (2006) Precarious work, women and the new economy: the challenge to legal norms. Hart, Oxford, pp 201–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong A, Goodwin J, O’Connor H, Hadfield S, Hall S, Lowden K, Plugor R (2018) Young people in the labour market: past, present, future. Routledge, Oxon/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory M, Connolly S (2008) Feature: the price of reconciliation: part-time work, families and women’s satisfaction. The Economic Journal 118(526):1–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw D, Johnson M, Rubery J, Keizer A (2016) Reducing precarious work in Europe through social dialogue: protective gaps and the role of social dialogue in Europe. Report for the European Commission, Institute of Work, Skills and Training, University of Duisburg-Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw D, Fagan C, Hebson G, Tavora I (eds) (2017) Making work more equal: a new labour market segmentation approach. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison K, Kalleberg AL (2013) Precarious work and flexibilization in South and Southeast Asia. American Behavioral Scientist 57(4):395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2012) From precarious work to decent work. Outcome document to the workers’ symposium on policies and regulations to combat precarious employment. International Labour Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2014) Global Employment Trends 2014: Risk of a jobless recovery? / International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2016) Social protection policy paper: social protection for domestic workers: key policy trends and statistics. International Labour Organisation

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2019) World employment and social outlook: trends 2019 International Labour Office. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ITUC (2010) Action guide: Decent work, decent life for domestic workers, Brussels: ITUC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokela M (2017) The role of domestic employment policies in shaping precarious work. Social Policy & Administration 51(2):286–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg AL (2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg A, Vallas S (2018) Probing precarious work: theory, research, and politics. Res Sociol Work 31:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Klehe UC, Koen J, De Pater IE, Kira M (2018) Too old to tango? Job loss and job search among older workers. In: Klehe UC, van Hooft EAJ (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of job loss and job search (pp. 433–464). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenner C, Menke K, Pfahl S (2012) Flexible Familienernährerinnen. Moderne Geschlechterarrangements oder prekäre Konstellationen? Barbara Budrich, Opladen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koukiadaki A, Katsampouras I (2017) Temporary contracts, precarious employment, employees’ fundamental rights and EU employment law. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretsos L (2010) The persistent pandemic of precariousness: young people at work. In: Tremmel J (ed) A Young Generation Under Pressure? March, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretsos L, Livanos I (2016) The extent and determinants of precarious employment in Europe. Int J Manpow 37(1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kring SA (2017) Gender in employment policies and programmes: What works for women? Employment Working Paper No. 235. ILO

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert R, Herod A (eds) (2016) Neoliberal Capitalism and Precarious Work Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton NR, Calveley M, Forson C (2015) Untangling multiple inequalities: intersectionality, work and globalisation. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 9(2) (Winter 2015):7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis H, Dwyer P, Hodkinson S et al (2015) Hyper-precarious lives: migrants, work and forced labour in the Global North. Prog Hum Geogr 39(5):580–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markova E, Paraskevopoulou A, McKay S (2019) Treading lightly: regularised migrant workers in Europe. Migr Lett 16(3):451–461. ISSN 1741-8992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell J (2018) Men’s talk in women’s work: ‘Doing being a nurse’. In The handbook of workplace discourse, edited by Bernadette Vine. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay S, Markova E, Paraskevopoulou A (2011) Undocumented Workers’ Transitions: Legal Status, Migration, and Work in Europe, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay S, Jefferys S, Paraksevopoulou A, Keles J (2012) Study on precarious work and social rights. London Metropolitan University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosoetsa S, Stillermann J, Tilly C, (eds.) (2016) Precarious Labor in Global Perspective, Special Issue. International Labour and working-class history 89:5–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitrou A (1978) Vivre sans famille? les solidarités familiales dans le monde d’aujourd’hui. Privat, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Premji S (2018) “It’s totally destroyed our life”: exploring the pathways and mechanisms between precarious employment and health and well-being among immigrant men and women in Toronto. Forum Italicum 48(1):8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/001458580604000102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser HB, Gornick JC, Parashar S (2008) Gender and nonstandard work hours in 12 European countries. Mon Labor Rev 131:83–103. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2008/02/art5full.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser T (2016) Dualization or liberalization? Investigating precarious work in eight European countries. Work, Employment and Society 30(6):949–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015609036

  • Rodgers G, Rodgers J (1989) Precarious jobs in labour market regulation: the growth of atypical employment in Western Europe. International Labour Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery J, Piasna A (2017) Labour market segmentation and deregulation of employment protection in the EU. In: Piasna A, Myant M (eds) Myths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. ETUI, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant M (2014) Domestic workers: Vulnerable workers in precarious work. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies 3(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J, Dex S, Joshi H (2008) Women and employment: changing lives and new challenges, Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour R (2012) We are all precarious – on the concept of the ‘precariat’ and its misuses. New Left Project, February 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheen V (2010) The social risks of precarious employment for women. Paper presented to International Social Security Association International Policy and Research conference on social security

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing G (2011) The precariat – the new dangerous class. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg C (2019) The hidden hand of domestic labor: domestic employers’ work practices in Chicago, USA. Front Sociol 4:80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia M, Alberti G (2018) Unpacking the Category of Migrant Workers in Trade Union Research: A Multi-Level Approach to Migrant Intersectionalities. Work, Employment and Society 33(2):314–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllidou A, Marchetti S (2015) Employers, Agencies and Immigration: Paying for Care, Farnham: Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas PE (2019) “I made myself small like a cat and ran away”: workplace sexual harassment, precarious immigration status and legal violence. J Gend Stud 28(6):674–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1604326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosko LF (2006) Precarious employment: towards an improved understanding of labour market insecurity. In: Vosko LF (ed) Precarious employment: understanding labour market insecurity in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, pp 3–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite L, Lewis H (2017) Precarious irregular migrants and their sharing economies. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(3):964–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren T, Lyonette C (2018) Good, bad and very bad part-time jobs for women? Re-examining the importance of occupational class for job quality since the ‘great recession’ in Britain. Work, Employment and Society, 32(4):747–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster J (2016) Microworkers of the gig economy: separate and precarious. New Labor Forum 25(3):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796016661511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz G, Ledwith S (2017) Migration and Domestic Work. Springer Books, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Young M (2010) Gendered differences in precarious work settings. Relat Ind 65(1):74–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou M (2015) The legal construction of hyper-dependence and hyper-precarity in migrant work relations. Int J Comp Labour Law Ind Relat 31(2):141–162

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Law, HROB, School of Management, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK

    Anna Paraskevopoulou

Authors
  1. Anna Paraskevopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Paraskevopoulou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UNU-MERIT & Princeton University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Klaus F. Zimmermann

Section Editor information

  1. School of Economics and International Business, Centre for Pluralist Economics, Faculty of Business and Law, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK

    Nick Drydakis

  2. University of Cambridge, Pembroke College, Cambridge, UK

    Nick Drydakis

  3. Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Nick Drydakis

  4. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany

    Nick Drydakis

  5. Global Labor Organization, Essen, Germany

    Nick Drydakis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Paraskevopoulou, A. (2020). Gender and Precarious Work. In: Zimmermann, K. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_30-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_30-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation