Abstract
This chapter discusses the consequences of informal intellectual property (IP) protection through religious rules on innovation. As religiosity is not necessarily accompanied by high levels of morality, the lack of formal IP institutions can be detrimental for technological progress. This fallacy is best visible in the case of Islam, which incorporates the protection of IP in its doctrine. Islamic societies are characterized by weak IP protection regimes, high rates of piracy, and low levels of innovation. The legal enforcement of IP rights is hence beneficial in the absence of trust in the society and cannot be substituted by religious beliefs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Marghinani B (1791) The Hedaya: C. Hamilton translation. T. Bensley, London
Barro R (2003) Religion adherence data. Available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/barro/publications/religion-adherence-data
Beltrametti S (2009) The legality of intellectual property rights under Islamic law. In: Mach T et al (eds) The Prague yearbook of comparative law. The Prague Centre for International and Comparative Law, Prague, pp 55–94
Berg TC (2013) Intellectual property and religious thoughts. Univ St Thomas Law J 10:579–589
Bnabou R, Ticchi D, Vindigni A (2021) Forbidden fruits: the political economy of science, religion, and growth. Rev Econ Stud 89(4):1785–1832. (forthcoming)
Carvalho J (2013) Veiling. Q J Econ 128:337–370
Cervellati M, Vanin P (2013) Thou shalt not covet: prohibitions, temptation and moral values. J Public Econ 103:15–28
Chen Y, Puttitanun T (2005) Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. J Dev Econ 78:474–493
Diwan I, Rodrik D (1991) Patents, appropriate technology, and north-south trade. J Int Econ 30:27–47
El-Bialy N, Gouda M (2011) Can shari’a be a deterrent for intellectual property piracy in Islamic countries? J World Intellect Prop 14:441–466
Greif A (2001) What went wrong? Western impact and middle eastern response. Harper Collins, New York
Greif A (2006) Institutions and the path to modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Greif A, Tabellini G (2017) The clan and the corporation: sustaining cooperation in China and Europe. J Comp Econ 45:1–35
Griffith PJ (2009) Intellectual appetite: a theological grammar. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC
Griffith PJ (2013) The natural right to property and the impossibility of owning the intangible: a tension in catholic thought. Univ St Thomas Law J 10:590–602
Grossman G, Lai E (2004) International protection of intellectual property. Am Econ Rev 94:1636–1653
Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2008) Trusting the stock market. J Financ LXIII:2257–2600
Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2009) Cultural biases in economic exchange? Q J Econ 124:1095–1131
Helpman E (1993) Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61:1247–1280
Jamar SD (1992) The protection of intellectual property under Islamic law. Cap Univ Law Rev 21:1079–1106
Javorcik B (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am Econ Rev 94(3):605–627
Kuran T, Rubin J (2018) The financial power of the powerless: socioeconomic status and interest rates under partial rule of law. Econ J 128:758–796
Levy G, Razin R (2014) Rituals or good works: social signalling in religious organizations. J Eur Econ Assoc 12:1317–1360
Malkawi BH (2013) Intellectual property protection from a sharia perspective. Univ St Thomas Law J 16:87–122
Markusen JR (2001) Contracts, intellectual property rights, and multinational investment in developing countries. J Int Econ 53:189–204
Maskus K, Penubarti M (1995) How trade-related are intellectual property rights? J Int Econ 39:227–248
Park WG (2008) International patent protection: 1960–2005. Res Policy 37:761–766
Platteau JP (2008) Religion, politics, and development: lessons from the lands of Islam. J Econ Behav Organ 68:329–351
Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work, civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Schlessinger L (2007) Views of religion and morality. In: 47-nation pew global attitudes survey. Pew Research Center Project, Washington, DC
Smith P (1999) Are weak patent rights a barrier to us exports? J Int Econ 48:151–177
Stern J (2013) Spiritual property, ‘intellectual’ property, and a solution to the mystery of ip rights in Jewish law. Univ St Thomas Law J 10:603–617
Wagner SC, Sanders GL (2001) Considerations in ethical decision-making and software piracy. J Bus Ethics 1-2:161–167
Yang D, Sonmez M (2007) Economic and cultural impact on intellectual property violations: a study of software piracy. J World Trade 41:731–750
Acknowledgments
Responsible Section Editor: Dr. Olga POPOVA. The chapter has benefited from valuable comments of the editors and anonymous referees. Financial support by PRIN2017 - PI Naghavi is gratefully noted. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Naghavi, A., Pignataro, G. (2022). Religion, Intellectual Property, and Innovation. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_255-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_255-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences