Skip to main content

New Political Institutionalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Inside Activism for Sustainable Development

Abstract

This chapter makes a critical assessment of how different versions of new institutionalism understand and conceptualize agency. We argue that they lack a more nuanced understanding of human agency and how it relates to institutions. We further argue for the need to take political agency seriously, to perceive institutional change and stability as being stimulated by both endogenous and exogenous forces, and to recognize that transformative effects can follow from gradual change. We make a theoretical positioning on how to perceive agency in new institutionalism in a more political sense by acknowledging the relevance of both combative action and social adaptation. Thus, it is an argument of consolidating political and sociological ideas and of up-grading political discourse in institutional theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C., & Rönnblom, M. (2014). Feminist discursive institutionalism—A poststructural alternative. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(3), 170–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’ to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Røvik, K. A. (1999). The ambiguity of appropriateness. In M. Egeberg & P. Laegraid (Eds.), Organizing political institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos: International Review for Social Sciences, 47, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durnová, A. (2015). Lost in translation: Expressing emotions in policy deliberation. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 222–238). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, L. (2011). Rational choice theory: Potential and limits. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnová, A., & Orsini, M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of critical policy studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 952–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. C. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political studies, XLVI, 951–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, N., Bremner, A., Sutherland, E., Vliek, M., Passer, M. W., & Smith, R. E. (2015). Psychology. The science of mind and behaviour (3rd ed.). London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrelmann, K. (2009). Social structure and personality development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalization. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, I., & Weingast, B. (2005). Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2009). Streetlights and shadows: Searching for the keys to adaptive decision making. Denver: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2013). Seeing what others don’t: The remarkable ways we gain insights. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1950). Politics. Who gets what, when, how. New York: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, D., & Forester, J. (2015). Conflict, improvisation, governance. Street level practices for urban democracy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecours, A. (2005). New institutionalism: Issues and questions. In A. Lecours (Ed.), New institutionalism. Theory and analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2010). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. In J. Pierre & P. W. Ingraham (Eds.), Comparative administrative change and reform: Lessons learned. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, J. (2016). Subversion in institutional change and stability. A neglected mechanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007). Challenges and growth: The development of the interdisciplinary fields of institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2011). Institutional theory in political science: The “new institutionalism”. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path-dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). Old institutionalisms. In R. Rhodes, S. Binder, & B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (1996). Political institutions: An overview. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting political back into the political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World Politics, 61(3), 516–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, D. D. (1991). Roles, rules, and rationality in the new institutionalism. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1239–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D., & Brown, C. (2013). Childhood and adult political development. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 59–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism ‘old’ and ‘new’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 70–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (2005). The flight from reality in the human sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. (2006). Rational choice institutionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behaviour. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streek, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streek & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, L. P. (2006). Making intuition matter. In S. F. Schram & B. Caterino (Eds.), Making political science matter: Debating knowledge, research, and method. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. (2008). Toward a new theory of institutional change. World Politics, 60(2), 281–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1991). Institutionalization and cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Hysing .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hysing, E., Olsson, J. (2018). New Political Institutionalism. In: Green Inside Activism for Sustainable Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56723-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics