Skip to main content

Do Easy Topics Predict Effectiveness Better Than Difficult Topics?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10193))

Abstract

After a network-based analysis of TREC results, Mizzaro and Robertson [4] found the rather unpleasant result that topic ease (i.e., the average effectiveness of the participating systems, measured with average precision) correlates with the ability of topics to predict system effectiveness (defined as topic hubness). We address this issue by: (i) performing a more detailed analysis, and (ii) using three different datasets. Our results are threefold. First, we confirm that the original result is indeed correct and general across datasets. Second, we show that, however, that result is less worrying than what might seem at first glance, since it depends on considering the least effective systems in the analysis. In other terms, easy topics discriminate most and least effective systems, but when focussing on the most effective systems only this is no longer true. Third, we also clarify what happens when using the GMAP metric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berto, A., Mizzaro, S., Robertson, S.: On using fewer topics in information retrieval evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval, ICTIR 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kleinberg, J.M.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM 46(5), 604–632 (1999). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=324140

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mizzaro, S.: The good, the bad, the difficult, and the easy: something wrong with information retrieval evaluation? In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds.) ECIR 2008. LNCS, vol. 4956, pp. 642–646. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Mizzaro, S., Robertson, S.: HITS hits TREC: exploring IR evaluation results with network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2007). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1277824&CFID=912758227&CFTOKEN=40185811

  5. Robertson, S.: On GMAP: and other transformations. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson, S.: On smoothing average precision. In: Baeza-Yates, R., Vries, A.P., Zaragoza, H., Cambazoglu, B.B., Murdock, V., Lempel, R., Silvestri, F. (eds.) ECIR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7224, pp. 158–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28997-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Mizzaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roitero, K., Maddalena, E., Mizzaro, S. (2017). Do Easy Topics Predict Effectiveness Better Than Difficult Topics?. In: Jose, J., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56607-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56608-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics