Abstract
Language is critical to building knowledge in science as students are increasingly asked to read complex informational texts and to develop sophisticated means of oral and written expression, as expected by the Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS] (NGSS Lead States 2013). Developing literacy in content areas is particularly important for English language learners (ELLs), whose still-emergent academic English language skills often undermine their academic performance across subject areas (see discussion in Ardasheva et al. 2016).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Although vocabulary was assessed in this study, the intervention itself did not include an explicit vocabulary instruction component to qualify for the second line of research.
- 2.
August et al. (2016) did report, however, that the participating teachers dropped some of the vocabulary games due to insufficient time.
- 3.
The term “incidental”—rather than the more often used term “embedded”—was chosen to better describe the teacher’s practices. That is, although both terms suggest brevity in application, the term “embedded” refers to vocabulary instruction that consists of providing a brief verbal definition to a new word (August et al. 2016), not reflecting the wide-ranging repertoire of verbal and non-verbal strategies used by the teacher.
- 4.
Although the reported lower-end effect sizes were comparable to in-service professional development interventions, the upper-end effects were substantially larger (.95 for science concepts and vocabulary in writing).
References
Advocates for Children of New York (2010). Students with interrupted formal education: A challenge for the New York City public schools. Retrieved from: http://www.advocatesforchildren.org/SIFE%20Paper%20final.pdf?pt=1
Ardasheva, Y., Bowden, J. O., Morrison, J. A., & Tretter, T. R. (2015a). Comic relief: Using comic and illustrated trade books to support science learning in first year English language learners. Science Scope, 38(6), 39–47.
Ardasheva, Y., Norton-Meier, L., & Hand, B. (2015b). Negotiation, embeddedness, and non-threatening learning environments as themes of science and language convergence for English language learners. Studies in Science Education, 51(2), 201–249.
Ardasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. (2016). Mediation in the relationship among EL status, vocabulary, and science reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research. Published online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220671.2016.1175407?journalCode=vjer20
Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2017). Developing science-specific, technical vocabulary of high-school newcomer English learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 252–271.
August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57.
August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 345–376.
August, D., Artzi, L., & Barr, C. (2016). Helping ELLs meet standards in English language arts and science: An intervention focused on academic vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(4), 373–396.
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.) (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., Lively, T. J., & White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.
Cervetti, G. N., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & McClung, N. (2015). Factors that influence the difficulty of science words. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(2), 153–185.
Common Core State Standards Initiative [CCSSI]. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
Fang, Z. (2008). Going beyond the fab five: Helping students cope with the unique linguistic challenges of expository reading in intermediate grades. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(6), 476–487.
Fazio, X., & Gallagher, T. L. (2014). Morphological development levels of science content vocabulary: Implications for science-based texts in elementary classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1407–1423.
Fisher, P. J., & Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (2013). A few words about math and science. Educational Leadership, 71(3), 46–51.
Hakuta, K., Butler, Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? ((Policy Report 2000–1)). San Francisco, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261–280.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”?. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 235–253.
Lee, O., Luykx, A., Buxton, C., & Shaver, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269–1291.
Lee, O., Deaktor, R., Enders, C., & Lambert, J. (2008). Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 726–747.
Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D. J. (2005). Building academic vocabulary: Teacher’s manual. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Miller, J., Mitchell, J., & Brown, J. (2005). African refugees with interrupted schooling in the high school mainstream: Dilemmas for teachers and students. Prospect Journal: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20(2), 19–33.
Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 571–592.
Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/NGSS%20DCI%20Combined%2011.6.13.pdf.
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256.
Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2013). Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Understanding Language Initiative.
Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Scott, J., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Asselin, M. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty three Canadian upper-elementary classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 269–286.
Shaw, J. M., Lyon, E. G., Stoddart, T., Mosqueda, E., & Menon, P. (2014). Improving science and literacy learning for English language learners: Evidence from a pre-service teacher preparation intervention. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(5), 621–643.
Short, D. J., & Boyson, B. A. (2012). Helping newcomer students succeed in secondary schools and beyond. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Stoddart, T., & Mosqueda, E. (2015). Teaching science to English language learners: A study of preservice teacher preparation. Teacher Education & Practice, 28(2/3), 269–286.
Zong, J., & Batalova, J. (2015). The limited English proficient population in the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/limited-english-proficient-population-united-states.
Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 93–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ardasheva, Y. (2017). Scaffolding Science Vocabulary for Middle School Newcomer ELLs. In: de Oliveira, L., Campbell Wilcox, K. (eds) Teaching Science to English Language Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53593-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53594-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)