Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 58))

Abstract

The phylloxera crisis, which started in the 1870s, coincided with a wine shortage period as well as winemaking innovations and wine diversification. This increased variability of wine products was perceived as harmful because it impeded the acknowledgement of wine quality. The French authorities struggled to contain the variability of wine products and their many subcategories. Numerous legislative initiatives took place: the idea of origin was first interpreted as a traceability link to the vineyard and later, with the 1935 law on Controlled Denominations of Origin (fr. AOC) was perceived as heritage, mirroring superior taste-quality, which required constraining the vintners’ wine-growing and wine-making practices. Different interpretations of the notion of heritage led to a new heterogeneity in the quality of wines originating from the AOCs, and disputes about terroir quality persist in modern times. This chapter explores the notion of terroir beyond its interpretation as a simple resource and notes that these perceived incompatible interpretations should coexist and be reconciled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bowen (2010), Feagan (2007), Jenkins and Parrott (2002), Kan and Gulcubuk (2008), Lamine (2005), Paxson (2010), Selfa and Qazi (2005).

  2. 2.

    Berard and Marchenay (2006), Ilbery et al. (2005).

  3. 3.

    Brunori and Rossi (2007).

  4. 4.

    Bérard and Marchenay (1995),Dessaux (2006), Fonte (2008), Letablier (1997), Selfa and Qazi (2005), Tellstrom et al. (2005), Wilk (1999).

  5. 5.

    Ilbery et al. (2005).

  6. 6.

    See Callon and Latour (1981) for fundamental pioneering work on Science and Technology Studies (STS).

  7. 7.

    Latour (1983).

  8. 8.

    See the economic theory of information asymmetry and the seminal article by Akerlof (1970), for whom this real quality stems from a “real” knowledge of goods. But this “real” quality can also be seen as “conventional”, in other words as the result of a social agreement on objects Eymard-Duvernay (1989), Eymard-Duvernay (2006a, b), Young (1996).

  9. 9.

    Garella and Petrakis (2008), Grossman and Stiglitz (1980), Marette (2007), Shapiro (1982).

  10. 10.

    As commercial brands have been studied extensively Di Palma (2014).

  11. 11.

    This commercial quality involved an absence of flaws and especially a good stability of wines, which should not evolve too fast in the bottle or the tanks. For a detailed study see Stanziani (2003a, b, c).

  12. 12.

    Many consumers were likely also concerned about this situation, but they left virtually no direct traces in the archives.

  13. 13.

    I prefer to talk of variability and not of “uncertainty regarding quality”, like Lamine (2005) for example, as the idea of uncertainty implies that a more or less hidden or concealed “real” quality exists, when the object of disputes surrounding regulation is to determine the modalities of existence of commodities with their acceptable variability, regardless of any “truth” about what they are.

  14. 14.

    See Stanziani (2003b).

  15. 15.

    1824 Law completed by the 1857 Law.

  16. 16.

    Legal experts say “manufactured”, but this term could cause confusion if used in a different way to winemakers and merchants. That is why we prefer the term “elaborate”.

  17. 17.

    The term “origin” is understood not in geographical terms, but as the production unit from which the wine comes.

  18. 18.

    The Champagne appellation played a driving and decisive role in the reinforcement of the legal interpretation. E. Clémentel described the stages of this journey towards turning appellations of origin into wine “law”:

    “On 12 July 1845, the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation had to rule on a trial against wine merchants from Touraine who had affixed the name of the widow Clicquot and those of Ay and Verzy on bottle corks. The court considered that this constituted personation under Article 1 of the 28 July 1824 law.

    In 1847, the civil appeal court of the Court of Cassation ruled that owners and winegrowers were entitled to the protection of this law for wines coming from their harvests.

    On 4 March 1870, the Court of Angers recognized the merit of legal proceedings instituted by owners of the Ay, Bouzy and Sillery winegrowers and by merchants who purchased their products, against merchants from another region who sold champanized wines in the Anjou under these names. On 19 July 1887, the same Court ruled that the appellation “Champagne” had to be reserved for wines from and produced in the Champagne region.

    On 11 April 1889, it declared that the fraudulent indication of the word Champagne for wine that had not been produced and harvested in the Champagne region constituted an offence provided for and punished by Article 1 of the 28 July 1824 law. It considered that Champagne or Champagne wine should be considered as wine both harvested and produced in Champagne, an old province of France […] on 26 July 1889, the Court of Cassation rejected the appeal lodged against this decision.

    Finally, on 18 November 1892, through the adoption of motives, the Court of Paris confirmed a judgement by the Reims commercial court on 17 July 1891 […]: ‘it follows that since the designation of Champagne or Champagne wine does not fall under the public domain, it cannot apply to sparkling wine that is not from Champagne’…” Clémentel (1914).

  19. 19.

    For a detailed account of the elaboration and then implementation of this law, which P.-A. Dessaux said was “probably largely adopted because it offered a general framework for the protection of wine appellations”, see Dessaux (2006). Note however that the analysis is more focused on the “substantial qualities” of commodities than on the question of appellations of origin.

  20. 20.

    Wolikow (2009).

  21. 21.

    Torre (2002) developed a utilitarian economic analysis of AOC’s reputation as a “club” common good. For J. Capus, the common good was not reputation but the name of origin, which included all interpretations and meanings of the term, whether material or not. He did not seek to regulate the use of words, just one of the procedures supporting reputation building: the quality check based on the product and the gustative experience of wine.

  22. 22.

    I would like to thank P. Baudouin for sharing these documents with me.

  23. 23.

    Yet others reject any constraint, such as those who argue that the determination of terroir quality is a natural determination, who received little attention in this article. But they do not do so in the name of a threat weighing on the long-term survival of appellations of origin.

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G.A. (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 84(3) pp. 488–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenson, V. (1871) Le parfait vigneron: Ouvrage inédit à l’usage des vrais gourmets, contenant une notice sur les soins à apporter aux vins depuis la maturité du fruit jusqu’à la mise en bouteille, (Lyon: impr. de A. Vingtrinier)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berard, L. and P. Marchenay (2006) Local products and geographical indications: Taking account of local knowledge and biodiversity. International Social Science Journal, 58(187) pp. 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérard, L. and P. Marchenay (1995) Lieux, temps et preuves – la construction sociale des produits de terroir. Terrain, numero-24 - La fabrication des saints(mars 1995, [En ligne], mis en ligne le 08 juin 2007. URL: http://terrain.revues.org/3128. (Consulted 22 March 2013.)

  • Bowen, S. (2010) Embedding local places in global spaces: Geographical indications as a territorial development strategy. Rural Sociology, 9999(9999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunori, G. and A. Rossi (2007) Differentiating countryside: Social representations and governance patterns in rural areas with high social density: The case of chianti, italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2) pp. 183–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and B. Latour (1981) Unscrewing the big leviathan; or how actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so? Pp. 277–303 in K. K. a. A. C. (eds) ed., Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro-sociologies (London: Routledge an Kegan Paul)

    Google Scholar 

  • Capus, J. (1906) La défense des appellations régionales du département de la gironde. Pp. 31 in, Présenté à la session générale de la Société des Viticulteurs de Ftance et d’Ampélographie)

    Google Scholar 

  • Capus, J. (1947) L’evolution de la législation sur les appellations d’origine; genèse des appellations contrôlées, (Paris: INAO– Editions Louis LARMAT)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clémentel, E. (1914) Un drame économique: Les délimitations. Le passé, l’avenir, (Paris: P. Lafite et Cie)

    Google Scholar 

  • COFRADEP (1974a) Appellations d’origine contrôlées. Le progrès Agricole et Viticole, 15 juin 1974) pp. 440–443

    Google Scholar 

  • COFRADEP (1974b) Appellations d’origine contrôlées – trois mots pour un programme (suite). Le progrès Agricole et Viticole, 15 mai 1974) pp. 364–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessaux, P.-A. (2006) Comment définir les produits alimentaires? L’élaboration des références pour l’application de la loi du 1er août 1905 entre expertise et consensus professionnel. Histoire, économie et société, 25(1) pp. 83–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Palma, S. (2014) L’histoire des marques depuis l’antiquité jusqu’au moyen âge,Société des Ecrivains)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eymard-Duvernay, F. (1989) Conventions de qualité et formes de coordination. Revue Economique, 40(2) pp. 329–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Eymard-Duvernay, F. (ed.) (2006a) L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats tome 1 débats, (Paris, La Découverte)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eymard-Duvernay, F. (ed.) (2006b) L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats. Tome 2 développements, (Paris, La Découverte)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallières, A. and J. Ruau (1908) Loi du 5° août 1908 modifiant l’article 11 de la loi du 1° août 1905 sur la répression des fraudes dans la vente de marchandisis et des flasifications des denrées alimentaires et des produits agricoles et complétant cette loi par un article additionnel. Pp. JO du 11 août 1908 p. 5637–5638 in, Journal officiel de la république française, N° 217, du 7? août 1905)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagan, R. (2007) The place of food: Mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems. Progress in Human Geography, 31(1) pp. 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonte, M. (2008) Knowledge, food and place. A way of producing, a way of knowing. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3) pp. 200–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Garella, P.G. and E. Petrakis (2008) Minimum quality standards and consumers’ information. Economic Theory, 36(2) pp. 283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffe, J. (1889) Loi du 14 août 1889. in,

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J. and J.E. Stiglitz (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am. Econ. Rev, 70(3) pp. 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B., C. Morris, H. Buller, D. Maye and M. Kneafsey (2005) Product, process and place: An examination of food marketing and labelling schemes in europe and north america. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(2) pp. 116–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, T. and N. Parrott (2002) The commodification of heritage and rural development in peripheral regions: Artisanal cheesemaking in rural wales. Ecolabels and the greening of the food market. Proceedings of a Conference Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 7–9 November 2002, pp. 51-61

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, A. (1999 [1822]) Manuel du sommelier ou instruction pratique sur la manière de soigner les vins – avec trois planches. Première édition 1813. Edition revue et augmentée., (Paris: Bibliothèque des Introuvables)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. and B. Gulcubuk (2008) Geographical indications for recovery and local owned of rural economy. Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi, Uludag Universitesi, 22(2) pp. 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C. (2005) Settling shared uncertainties: Local partnerships between producers and consumers. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4) pp. 324–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Laneyrie, F. (1926) Résultat en bourgogne des premières années d’application de la loi dite de protection des appellations d’origine. Étude documentaire (première étape sur la voie de sa suppression), (Macon: author’s printing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1983) Comment redistribuer le grand partage? Revue de Synthèse, III(N°110) pp. 203–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, B.A. (1828) Traité de la culture de la vigne et de la vinification,Rousselon)

    Google Scholar 

  • Letablier, M.-T. (1997) L’art et la matière - savoirs et ressources locales dans les productions spécifiques,Centre d’Etudes de l’emploi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loubet, E. and J. Ruau (1905) Loi du 1° août 1905 sur la répression des fraudes dans la vente des marcahndises et des falsifications des denrées alimentaires et des produits agricoles. in, Journal officiel de la république française, N° 210, du 5 août 1905)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marette, S. (2007) Minimum safety standard, consumers’ information and competition. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 32(3) pp. 259–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurial, L. (1865) L’art de boire, connaître et acheter le vin et toutes les boissons: Guide pratique du producteur, du marchand et du consommateur, (Paris: Librairie du “Petit journal”)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxson, H. (2010) Locating value in artisan cheese: Reverse engineering terroir for new-world landscapes. American Anthropologist, 112(3) pp. 444–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouillet, E.-. (1883) Traité des marques de fabrique et de la concurrence déloyale en tous genres, (Paris: Marchal et Billard)

    Google Scholar 

  • République Française (1921) Décret du 19 août 1921 pris pour l’application de la loi du 1er août 1905 sur la répression des fraudes. in République Française ed., (JORF du 19 août 1921 page 9753

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfa, T. and J. Qazi (2005) Place, taste, or face-to-face? Understanding producer–consumer networks in “local” food systems in washington state. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(4) pp. 451–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Sempé, H. (1898) Régime économique du vin. Faculté de droit de l’Université de Bordeaux

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1982) Consumer information, product quality, and seller reputation. Bell journal of economics & management science, 13(1) pp. 20–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanziani, A. (2003a) Action économique et contentieux judiciaires. Le cas du plâtrage du vin en france, 1851–1905. Genèses, 50(pp. 71-90

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanziani, A. (2003b) La construction de la qualité du vin, 1880-1914. Pp. 123-150 in A. Stanziani ed., La qualité des produits en france, xviiie-xxe siècles (Paris: Belin)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanziani, A. (2003c) La falsification du vin en france, 1880-1905: Un cas de fraude agro-alimentaire. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 50-2(2) pp. 154-186

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellstrom, R., I.-B. Gustafsson and L. Mossberg (2005) Local food cultures in the swedish rural economy. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4) pp. 346–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A. (2002) Les aoc sont-elles des clubs? Réflexions sur les conditions de l’action collective localisée, entre coopération et règles formelles. Revue d’économie industrielle, 100(pp. 39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, R. (1999) ‘Real belizean food’: Building local identity in the transnational caribbean. Am. Anthropol., 101(2)(p. 244

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolikow, C. (2009) La champagne viticole, banc d’essai de la délimitation (1903-1927). in, Territoires du vin [en ligne], Pour une redéfinition des terroirs

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1996) The economics of convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2, spring 1996) pp. 105–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genevieve Teil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teil, G. (2017). Protecting Appellations of Origin: One Hundred Years of Efforts and Debates. In: van Caenegem, W., Cleary, J. (eds) The Importance of Place: Geographical Indications as a Tool for Local and Regional Development. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53072-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53073-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics