Skip to main content

Michael L. Tushman: A Practice-Informed Explorer and Organizational Scholar with a Focus on Viable Organizations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers
  • 5328 Accesses

Abstract

This paper explores the contributions of organization theorist Michael L. Tushman to the field of organization change and development. The first section gives an overview of his early professional development and important professional stages followed by his key contributions to the field. These include his early focus on innovation and boundary spanning roles in innovation systems as well as an information processing approach for understanding and designing organizations also using network analysis. His quest for phenomena-driven and practically relevant work with a focus on the entire system and processes leads to the development of the congruence model – a general model to research, understand, assess, and further develop organizations. His work with doctoral students resulted in the punctuated equilibrium model that he applied to both organizations and technological changes as external forces of change. Another important contribution is his effort in solving Abernathy’s productivity dilemma by developing the concept of ambidextrous organizations. These can deal with the apparent paradox of simultaneous exploitation and exploration. Ambidextrous organizations require, however, ambidextrous leadership – a concept that he explored in detail with his long-term colleague and friend Charles O’Reilley. The final section gives an overview of the many awards that he received up to this point as well as the way in which he worked. Most of his theories and frameworks were codeveloped with colleagues and doctoral students in a dialogical fashion. The paper closes with Michael Tushman’s future concerns whether the developed theories, models, and recommendations regarding innovation will still hold in an increasingly web-based society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W. J. (1978). The productivity dilemma: Roadblock to innovation in the automobile industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1991). Managing through cycles of technological change. Research Technology Management, 34(3), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015). Reflections on the 2013 Decade Award – “Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited” ten years later. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Group decisions and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, R., Watson, J., & Westley, B. (1958). The dynamics of planned change. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Learning, 2(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R., MacMillan, I., & Tushman, M. L. (1992). The role of executive team actions in shaping dominant designs: Towards shaping technological progress. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 137–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1989). Organizational frame-bending: Principles for managing reorientation. Academy of Management Executive, 3(3), 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). Beyond the charismatic leader: Leadership and organizational change. In The training and development sourcebook, California Management Review, 32(2), 77–97. DOI: 10.2307/41166606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1999). The organizations of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competences for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilley III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilley III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). Lead and disrupt how to solve the innovator’s dilemma. Stanford University Books. Standford: Stanford University press

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 40(4), 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrum, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (1979). Managing communication networks in research and development laboratories. MIT Sloan School Management Review, 20(2), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (2004). Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (2014). The ambidextrous leader: Leadership tips for today to stay in the game tomorrow. IESE Insights, 3(4), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1980). External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26, 1071–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1982). Does gatekeeping make a difference? ChemTech, 12, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1983). A longitudinal study of the effects of boundary spanning supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development. Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrated concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilley III, C. A. (2007). Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 769–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals. Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., Virany, B., & Romanelli, E. (1992). Executive succession, strategic reorientation and organization evolution. Technology in Society, 42(7), 297–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., & Binns, A. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seong, S. (2014). A conversation with Michael Tushman on leadership, innovation, and strategic change. www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnwGw8OV_7M

  • Seong, S., Kim, Y., & Szulanski, G. (2015). Leadership, innovation and strategic change: A conversation with Michael Tushman. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Adler, P. S., Benner, M., Brunner, D. J., MacDuffie, J. P.; Osono, E., Staats, B. R., Takeuchi, H., Tushman, M. L., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Perspectives on the productivity dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant design: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 604–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binns, A., Harreld, B. J., O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2014). The art of strategic renewal. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D., Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. L.(1998). Navigating change: How CEO’s, top teams and boards steer transformation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., Gulati, R., & Tushman, M. L. (Eds.). (2015). Leading sustainable change: An organizational perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. L. (1988). Strategic organization design. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. L. (1998). Competing by design: The power of organizational architectures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, III, C. A., Harreld, J. B., & Tushman, M. L. (2009).Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Review, 51(4), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polzer, J., Gulati, R. Khurana, R., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Crossing boundaries to increase relevance in organizational research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(4), 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J. Probst, J., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. L. (1992). On the organizational determinants of technological change: Towards a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Special Issue on Business Models. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 448–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (1974). Organizational change: An exploratory study and case history. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (2007). On the co-evolution of knowing and doing: A personal perspective on the synergies between research and practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(2), 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (2014). The ambidextrous leader: Leadership tips for today to stay in the game tomorrow. IESE Insight, 23, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Allen, T. J. (1979). Modes of technology transfer as a function of position in the research-development-technical service spectrum. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 694–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (2002). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., O’Reilly III, C. A., & Nadler, D. (Eds.). (1989). The management of organizations. New York: Ballinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., Fenollosa, A., McGrath, D., O’Reilly III, C. A., & Kleinbaum, A. M. (2007). Relevance and rigor: Executive education as a lever in shaping practice and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(3), 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., & Binns, A. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., Lakhani, K., & Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2012). Open innovation and organization design. Special Issue on the Future of Organization Design. Journal of Organization Design, 1(1), 24–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Sackmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sackmann, S. (2017). Michael L. Tushman: A Practice-Informed Explorer and Organizational Scholar with a Focus on Viable Organizations. In: Szabla, D.B., Pasmore, W.A., Barnes, M.A., Gipson, A.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52878-6_97

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics