Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 59))

  • 1454 Accesses

Abstract

The medical care services market is currently confronted with increasing competition in the context of the development of private medical services providers. At the same time patients tend to become much more informed of the various treatment options as a consequence of medical information now being available through a variety of sources. Furthermore, they expect time, information and answers to their questions as well as politeness, empathy and attention from their doctor which brings them very close to the traditional consumer profile. Patients satisfaction is thus increasingly regarded as an important element in healthcare systems, even more so as it is also linked to positive medical and marketing results. It is even more important in the context of chronic illnesses where disease management is extended for a long period of time and treatment success is closely connected to patient compliance. The article aims to identify those attributes medical providers for diabetes care in the ambulatory setting in Romania should focus on in order to maximize patient satisfaction. By using the importance-performance analysis, factors were distributed into four quadrants according to the perceived levels of importance attributed by the consumers and the perceived performance offered by the medical unit. Results show that medical units should maintain efforts for ensuring a high performance level for the availability of the doctors and nurses attribute, engage in more active promotion of auxiliary support services and keep up the good work done with regards to accessibility and clinic facilities. The added value of the article lies in the fact that it presents a starting point for medical units in analyzing their strengths and weaknesses for two criteria used by consumers during the buying decision-making process: the importance of the attributes under analysis and the perceived performance offered by the supplier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taylor C, Benger J R (2004) Patient satisfaction in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 21:528-532

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boudreaux E D, O’Hea E L (2003) Patient satisfaction in the Emergency Department: A review of the literature and implications for practice. J Emerg Med 26:13-26

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prakash B (2010) Patient satisfaction. J Cutan Med Surg 3:151-155

    Google Scholar 

  4. Otani K et al (2009) Patient satisfaction: focusing on “Excellent”. Int J Healthc Manag 54:93-103

    Google Scholar 

  5. York A S, McCarthy K A (2009) Patient, staff and physician satisfaction: a new model instrument and their implications. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 24(2):178-191

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haug M R, Lavin B (1981) Practitioner or patient – Who’s in charge. J Health Soc Behav 22(3):212-229

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shendurnikar N, Thakkar P A (2013) Communication skills to ensure patient satisfaction. Indian J Pediatr 80:938-943

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bell R et al (1997) Charting patient satisfaction. Mark Health Serv 17(2): 22-29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chahal H, Mehta S (2013) Developing patient satisfaction construct for public and private health care sectors. J Serv Res 13:7-30

    Google Scholar 

  10. Romanian Association of Medicines Producers (2011) Over one million of a half Romanians suffer from diabetes, available at: http://arpim.ro/peste-un-milion-sijumatate-de-romani-sufera-de-diabet/ accessed 14 April 2014

  11. Baron-Epel O et al (2001) Evaluation of the consumer model: relationship between patients’expectations, perceptions and satisfaction with care. Int J Qual Health Care 13:317-323

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mooney G (1998) Beyond health outcomes: The benefits of health care. Health Care Anal 6:99-105

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad A M K et al (2013) The impact of marketing mix strategy on hospitals performance measured by patient satisfaction: am empirical investigation on Jeddah private sector hospital senior managers perspective. IJMS 5(6):201-227

    Google Scholar 

  14. Catană Gh A (2009) Marketingul serviciilor de ocrotire a sănătății. Alma Mater, Cluj-Napoca

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rădulescu V (2008) Marketingul serviciilor de sănătate. Uranus, București

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Health Insurance Institute reports received by the author upon written request – September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  17. Federația Asociațiilor Diabeticilor din România (FADR) at http://fadr.ro/

  18. Martilla J A, James J C (1977) Importance-performance analysis. J Mark 41(1):77-79

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blěsić I et al (2015) An importance-performance analysis of service quality in spa hotels. Econ Res. 27(1): 483-495

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20. Pak R J (2013) Combining Importance-Performance Analysis with Analytic Hierarchy Process for Enhancing Satisfaction. JOAMS. 1 (4):368-371

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silva F J H, Fernandes P O (2011) Importance-Performance Analysis as a Tool in Evaluating Higher Education Service Quality: The Empirical Results of Estig (IPB), The 17th IBIMA conference on Creating Global Competitive Economies: A 360-degree Approach, Milano, Italia, 14-15 November, pp. 306-313

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tyrrell T J, Okrant M J (2004) Importance-Performance Analysis: Some Recommendations from an Economic Planning Perspective. Tourism Analysis 9: 1-14

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wong M S et al (2011) The Use of Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) in Evaluating Japan’s E-government Services. JTAER 6(2): 17-30

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ministerul Sănătății (2014) Programul Național de Diabet Zaharat și alte boli de nutritive at: http://www.ms.gov.ro/documente/8_51_329_c.htm accessed 27 March 2014

  25. Oliver R L (2015) Satisfaction. A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer 2nd ed. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diț L et al (2012) Impactul severității bolii asupra satisfacției cu calitatea îngrijirii medicale la pacienții cu diabet de tip 2. Clujul Medical 85: 573-577

    Google Scholar 

  27. Redekop W K et al (2002) Health-Related Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Dutch Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes care 25:458-463

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.A. Coțiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Coțiu, M., Sabou, A. (2017). Patient Satisfaction with Diabetes Care in Romania – An Importance-performance Analysis. In: Vlad, S., Roman, N. (eds) International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology; 12th - 15th October 2016, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52874-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52875-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics