Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Story Behind the Approval of the First Bt Maize Product

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women in Sustainable Agriculture and Food Biotechnology

Part of the book series: Women in Engineering and Science ((WES))

Abstract

One of the first products of agricultural biotechnology to be brought to market was a maize (corn) product that had built in protection against an insect pest. This was achieved by inserting a bacterial gene encoding a protein toxin into the corn genome. This product represented all the promise biotechnology brings to sustainable agriculture (lower inputs for farmers, less pesticide use, higher yields, etc.) as well as the uncertainty associated with the safety (when used as food or feed and to the environment) of genetically engineered crops. Many scientific and technical hurdles had to be overcome to create and identify the event that would bring value to the grower and be commercially viable. Demonstration of the safety of this product together with political, ethical, and economic issues all stood in the path between scientific success and global market acceptance. This was an exciting and challenging time. This is the inside story.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartholomaeus A, Batista JC, Burachik M, Parrott W (2015) Recommendations from the workshop on comparative approaches to safety assessment of GM plant materials: a road toward harmonized criteria?, GM Crops Food Biotechnol Agric Food Chain 6:2, 69–79. doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1011886

  • Bushey DF, Bannon GA, Delaney BF, Graser G, Hefford M, Jiang X, Lees TC, Madduri KM, Pariza M, Privalle LS, Ranjan R, Saab-Rincon G, Schafer BW, Thelen JJ, Zhang JXQ, Harper MS (2014) Characteristics and safety assessment of intractable proteins in genetically modified crops. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 69:154–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius. Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA plants (CAC/GL 45-2003). Codex Alimentarius Commission. Rome, Italy: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme; 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney B, Astwood JD, Cunny H, EichenConn R, Herouet-Guicheney C, MacIntosh S, Meyer LS, Privalle L, Goa Y, Mattsson J, Levine M (2008) Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Food Chem Toxicol 46:S71–S97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devos Y, Aquilera J, Diveki Z, Gomes A, Liu Y, Paoletti C, du Jardin P, Herman L, Perry JN, Waigmann E (2014) EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead. Transgenic Res 23:1–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (1972) 7 U.S.C. §§ 136–136y

    Google Scholar 

  • Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) (1938) Pub. L. No. 75–717, 52 Stat. 1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE, Vieths S, Sampson HA, Hill D, Ebisawa M, Taylor SL, Van Ree R (2008) Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops—what makes sense? Nat Biotechnol 26:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond BG (2008) Food safety of proteins in agricultural biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hérouet C, Esdaile DJ, Mallyon BA, Debruyne E, Schulz A, Currier T, Hendrickx K, van der Klis RJ, Rouan D (2005) Safety evaluation of the phosphinothricin acetyltransferase proteins encoded by the pat and bar sequences that confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium herbicide in transgenic plants. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 41:134–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James C (2014) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014 ISAAA Brief No. 49. ISAAA, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch MS, Ward JM, Levine SL, Baum JA, Vicini JL, Hammond BG (2015) The food and environmental safety of Bt crops. Frontiers Plant Sci 6:283. doi:10.3389//fpls.2015.00283

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladics GS, Cressman RF, Herouet-Guicheney C, Herman RA, Privalle L, Song P, Ward JM, McClain S (2011) Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60:46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Madduri KM, Schafer BW, Hasler JM, Lin G, Foster ML, Embrey SK, Sastry-Dent L, Song P, Larrinua IM, Gachotte DJ, Herman RA (2012) Preliminary safety assessment of a membrane-bound delta 9 desaturase coandidate protein for transgenic oilseed crops. Food Chem Toxicol 50:3776–3784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Pub. L. 91–190, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4347, January 1, 1970, as amended by Pub. L. 94–52, July 3, 1975, Pub. L. 94–83, August 9, 1975, and Pub. L. 97-258, § 4(b), Sept. 13, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant Variety Protection Act (PVP): Public Law 91–577, 84 Stat. 1542–1559; Dec. 24, (1970) as amended by Pub. L. Law 96–574, 94 Stat. 3350–3352. Sec. 1–19; Dec. 22, 1980; Pub. L. 97–164, 96 Stat. 37–38, 41, and 45. Sec. 127, 134, 145; April 2, 1982; Pub. L. 100–203, 101 Stat. 1330–28. Sec. 1505; Dec. 22, 1987; Pub. L.102–560, 106 Stat. 4231, 4232. Sec. 3; Oct. 28, 1992; Pub. L. 103–349, 108 Stat. 3136-3145. Sec. 1–15; Oct. 6, 1994; Pub. L. 104–127, 110 Stat. 1186, Sec. 913; April 4, 1996 and Regulations and Rules of Practice, 7 CFR, Part 97, as of September 1, 1996; Federal Register: August 2, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 149, 47243–47245); Federal Register: January 10, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 71, 1359–1360); Federal Register: May 19, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 96, 28783–28786); Federal Register: September 16, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 179, 54609–54612)  

    Google Scholar 

  • Privalle LS, Wright M, Reed J, Hansen G, Dawson J, Dunder EM, Chang Y-F, Powell ML, Meghji M (2000) Phosphomannose isomerase—a novel system for plant selection. Mode of action and safety assessment. In: Fairbairn C, Scoles G, McHughen A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the biosafety of genetically modified organisms, University of Saskatchewan Press, Saskatoon, Canada, pp 171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Privalle LS, Chen J, Claper G, Hunst P, Spiegelhalter F, Zhong CX (2012) Development of an agricultural biotechnology crop product: Testing from Discovery to commercialization. J Agric Food Chem 60:10179–10187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raybould A, Kilby P, Graser G (2013) Characterising microbial protein test substances and establishing their equivalence with plant-produced proteins for use in risk assessments of transgenic crops. Transgenic Res 22:445–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford JC, Klein TM, Wolf ED, Allen N (1987) Delivery of substances ionto cells and tissues using a particle bombardment process. Part Sci Tehchnol 5:27–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F (2006) Mycotoxin reduction in Bt corn: potential economic, health, and regulatory impacts. Transgenic Res 15:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Triangle Park, 27705, North Carolina, USA

    Laura S. Privalle

Authors
  1. Laura S. Privalle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura S. Privalle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bayer CropScience , Morrisville, North Carolina, USA

    Laura S. Privalle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Privalle, L.S. (2017). The Story Behind the Approval of the First Bt Maize Product. In: Privalle, L. (eds) Women in Sustainable Agriculture and Food Biotechnology . Women in Engineering and Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52201-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52201-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52200-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52201-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation