Skip to main content

Sharing Economy as an Urban Phenomenon: Examining Policies for Sharing Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Implications of Virtual Work

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

The sharing economy is a growing model in the overall economy. Based on peer-to-peer relations mediated through online platforms, it seems to break new ground in the study of the relationship between online and offline. Although the Internet is where sharing happens the most, car-sharing, house-sharing, swapping, etc. are giving shape to new territories, which are inherently digital and urban.

This chapter explores the sharing economy as an urban phenomenon. First, it discusses the concept of the sharing city and it proposes an analytical model of the roles institutions could play in the implementation of sharing initiatives. Second, it presents case studies from across the globe. Finally, it defines the effects of the sharing economy as an instituted process of interaction between individuals and their environment.

The authors discussed the setting, the structure and content of the chapter. Silvia Mazzucotelli Salice authored sections ‘From Sharing Economy to the Sharing Economies’, ‘The Revival of Sharing in Cities’ and ‘On Urban Sharing Activities: Tales from Around the Globe’; Ivana Pais authored sections ‘Beyond Polanyi’s Taxonomy: A Framework for the Analysis of Sharing Cities’, ‘Milano Sharing City’ and ‘Sharing Policies for Sharing Economies: A Comparative Analysis’. Closing remarks are the result of a joint work of the two authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This certificate is part of a broad communication plan based first and foremost on the collaborative creation (thanks to a contest) of a logo for the project, intended to distinguish all services sponsored/supported/selected by the city among others and thus to encourage larger confidence among citizens and to support all new start-ups in expanding easily the level of users.

  2. 2.

    The authors of this chapter were involved in the Sharexpo Committee as part of their observant participation.

Bibliography

  • Agyeman, J. (2014). Moving beyond the sharing economy: The case for sharing cities. Just Sustainabilities. http://julianagyeman.com/2014/07/beyond-sharing-economy-case-sharingcities/. Date Accessed 27 Sept 2015.

  • Agyeman, J., McLaren, D., & Schaefer-Borrego A. (2013). Briefing: Sharing cities. https://www.foe.co.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/agyeman_sharing_cities.pdf. Date Accessed 27 Sept 2015.

  • Aigrain, P. (2012). Sharing. Culture and the economy in the internet age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (1991). Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Culture, 36, 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law Journal, 114(2), 273–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit. City, 13(2–3), 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city. Information technology, economic restructuring and the urbanregional process. Hoboken: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P., & Morgan, K. (1990). Learning through networking: Regional innovation and lessons of Baden-Württemberg. Cardiff: University of Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. (1997). Political economy of modern capitalism: Mapping convergence and diversity. London-Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., Le Galès, P., Trigilia, C., & Voelzkow, H. (2001). Local production systems in Europe: Rise or demise? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. (2014). Civic crowdfunding: Participatory communities, entrepreneurs and the political economy of place. Entrepreneurs and the Political Economy of Place. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2434615. Date Accessed 9 May 2014.

  • Długosz, P. M. (2014). The rise of the sharing city examining origins and futures of urban sharing. Thesis for the fulfilment of the Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy Lund, Sweden. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/4696439. Date Accessed 9 Sept 2015.

  • Dore, R. (1986). Flexible rigidities: Industrial policy and structural adjustment in the Japanese economy, 1970–80. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh: Why the future of business is sharing. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenflo, N. (2013). What’s next for the sharing movement? Shareable. http://www.shareable.net/blog/whats-next-for-the-sharing-movement. Date Accessed 24 Aug 2015.

  • Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital. Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infranca, J., & Davidson, N. M. (2016). The sharing economy as an urban phenomenon. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34, 215–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interian, J. (2016). Up in the air: Harmonizing the sharing economy through Airbnb regulations. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 39, 129–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2013). Is Seoul the next great sharing city? Our World. http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/is-seoul-the-next-great-sharing-city. Date Accessed 29 Dec 2015.

  • Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities: Social conflicts and governance: Social conflicts and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, P., & Lequesne, C. (1997). Les paradoxes des régions en Europe. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: Ubiquification and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1990 orig. pub. 1923). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, D., & Agyeman, J. (2015). Sharing cities. A case for truly smart and sustainable cities. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping, individuals, consumerism and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, J., Eskandari-Qajar, Y., Weissman, E., Hall, M., Mann, A., & Luna, M. (2013). Policies for shareable cities: A sharing economy policy primer for urban leaders. Shareable and the Sustainable Economies Law Center. http://www.shareable.net/blog/policies-for-a-shareable-city. Date Accessed 23 Sept 2016.

  • Pais, I., & Provasi, G. (2015). Sharing economy: A step towards the re-embeddedness of the economy? Stato e Mercato, 105, 347–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. A. (1975). Sharing: The integration of intimate economics. Anthropologica, 17(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, G., & Palmer, R. (2010). Eventful cities. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2013). Prosumption: Evolution, revolution, or eternal return of the same? Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, M. (2014). Mega-events and the sharing economy. Sharexpo. Documento di indirizzo. http://www.sharexpo.it/il-documento/. Date Accessed 9 Mar 2015.

  • Sabel, C. F. (1989). Flexible specialization and the re-emergence of regional economies. In P. Hirst & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), Reversing industrial decline? Industrial structure and policy in britain and her competitors. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1991). The global city. New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2007). A sociology of globalization. New York: Northon & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (2014). Debating the sharing economy. http://www.greattransition.org. Date Accessed 4 Apr 2015.

  • Scott, A. J. (1988a). Flexible production systems and regional development: The rise of new industrial spaces in North America and Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1988b). New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (1992). Regional development reconsidered. In H. Ernste & V. Meier (Eds.), Regional development and contemporary industrial response. London: Bellhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharexpo. (2014). Documento di Indirizzo Sharexpo. http://www.collaboriamo.org/risorse/documento-di-indirizzo-di-sharexpo/. Date Accessed 24 Sept 2016.

  • Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., van Marrewijk, C., & van Oort, F. G. (2012). Processes of change in urban systems. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, E. (2014). New media, new civics? Policy & Internet, 6(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salice, S.M., Pais, I. (2017). Sharing Economy as an Urban Phenomenon: Examining Policies for Sharing Cities. In: Meil, P., Kirov, V. (eds) Policy Implications of Virtual Work. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52057-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52057-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52056-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52057-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics