Skip to main content

Higher Commitment Entry Modes in International New Ventures: The Influence of Strategical Orientations

  • Conference paper
The Customer is NOT Always Right? Marketing Orientationsin a Dynamic Business World

Abstract

The choice of entry mode in foreign markets is an important strategic decision with major consequences for the success in international new ventures (INVs). It is generally accepted that these firms choose relatively low-commitment entry modes to operate in foreign markets. Nevertheless, this study extends previous international entrepreneurship research, including insights on antecedents of international new ventures’ choice of higher commitment entry modes in foreign markets. The paper also goes further than previous international entrepreneurship research, by addressing the strategic consequences of rapid entry into foreign markets. Additionally, the results of this work encourage international entrepreneurs to look beyond the explicit value of experiential market knowledge to realize the potential value of international market orientation as an antecedent to higher commitment entry modes. The model proposes a positive effect of entrepreneurial orientation and early international entry on international market orientation which, in turn, is positively related to higher commitment entry modes. The hypotheses were tested on country-level data from Spain, using a structural equation model to analyze relationships between the latent variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, J. S. and T. S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Non-Response Bias in Mail Surveys.” Journal of Marketing Research 16 (August): 396-402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armario, J. M., Ruiz, D. M. and E. M. Armario. 2008. “Market Orientation and Internationalization in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.” Journal of Small Business Management 46 (4): 485-511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelund, A., Madsen, T. K. and O. Moen. 2007. “A Review of the Foundation, International Marketing Strategies, and Performance of International New Ventures.” European Journal of Marketing 41 (11/12): 1423-1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. and A. Ko. 2001. “An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation.” Organization Science 12 (2): 54-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. 2005. “Creative Tension: The Significance of Ben Oviatt’ and Patricia Mcdougall’ Article: Toward a Theory of International New Ventures.” Journal of International Business Studies 36: 9-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B. R. and A. C. Bluedorn. 1999. “The Relationship Between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 20: 421-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becherer, R. C. and J. G. Maurer. 1997. “The Moderating Effect of Environmental Variables on the Entrepreneurial and Marketing Orientation of Entrepreneur-Led Firms.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 22 (1): 47-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J., Crick, D. and S. Young. 2004. “Small Firm Internationalization and Business Strategy - An Exploratory Study of ‘Knowledge-Intensive’ and ‘Traditional’ Manufacturing Firms in the UK.” International Small Business Journal 22 (1): 23-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey, W. J. and G. Tesar. 1977. “The Export Behaviour of Smaller-Sized Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of International Business Studies 8 (1): 93-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blesa, A. and E. Bigné. 2005. “The Effect of Market Orientation on Dependence and Satisfaction in Dyadic Relationships.” Marketing Intelligence & Planning 23 (3): 249-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomstermo, A., Eriksson, K. and D. D. Sharma. 2004. “Domestic Activity and Knowledge Development in the Internationalization Process of Firms.” Journal of International Entrepreneurship 2: 239-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D. 2002. “Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance.” Journal of International Business Studies 33 (2): 203-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, L. N. and G. Nakos. 2004. “SME International Entry Mode Choice and Performance: A Transaction Cost Perspective.” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 28 (3): 229-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgel, O. and G. C. Murray. 2000. “The International Market Entry Choices of Start-Up Companies in High Technology Industries.” Journal of International Marketing 8 (2): 33-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, T. 1980. “On the Internationalization Process of Firms.” European Research 8 (November): 273-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, S. and C. Campbell-Hunt. 2004. “A Strategic Approach to Internationalisation: A Traditional Versus ‘Born Global’ Approach.” Journal of International Marketing 12 (1): 57-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. 2006. “The Network Dynamics of International New Ventures.” Journal of International Business Studies 37 (5): 713-731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. and M. V. Jones. 2004. “Methodological Issues in International Entrepreneurship Research.” Journal of Business Venturing 19 (4): 485-508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. and H. J. Munro. 1995. “Growing the Entrepreneurial Firm Networking for International Market Development.” European Journal of Marketing 29 (7): 49-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. and H. J. Munro. 1997. “Network Relationships and the Internationalization Process of Small Software Firms.” International Business Review 6 (4): 361-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Green, K. M. and D. P. Slevin. 2006. “Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation-Sales Growth Rate Relationship.” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 30 (1): 57-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G. and M. P. Miles. 1999. “Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit Competitive.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 (3): 47-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G. and D. P. Slevin. 1989. “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments.” Strategic Management Journal 10: 75-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. 2004. “Scott Shane, A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual Opportunity Nexus (Book).” International Small Business Journal 22 (2): 206-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Sapienza, H. J. and H. Crijins. 2005. “The Internationalization of Small and Medium-Sized Firms.” Small Business Economics 24: 409-419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. and F. Webster. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.” Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 23-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G., Lumpkin, G. and J. Covin. 1997. “Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (1): 2-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. and K. Weaver. 1997. “Environmental Determinants and Individual-Level Moderators of Alliance Use.” Academy of Management Journal 40: 404-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeledo, I. and K. Sivakumar. 2004. “International Market Entry Mode Strategies of Manufacturing Firms and Service Firms.” International Marketing Review 21 (1): 68-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elg, U. 2002. “Inter-Firm Market Orientation: Its Significance and Antecedents in Distribution Networks.” Journal of Marketing Management 18 (7/8): 633-656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elg, U. 2007. “Market Orientation as Inter-Firm Cooperation: An International Study of the Grocery Sector.” European Management Journal 25 (4) : 283-297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erramili, M. K. and C. P. Rao. 1993. “Service Firms’ Internacional Entry-Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction Cost Analysis Approach.” Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 19-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad, H. and R. Wright. 2003. “Internationalization of SMEs: Toward a New Paradigm.” Small Business Economics 20: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P. N., Tarnovskaya, V. and U. Elg. 2008. “Market Driving Multinationals and their Global Sourcing Network.” International Marketing Review 25 (5): 504-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, D. C. and J. Wiggenhorn. 2007. “Born Globals, the Choice of Globalization Strategy, and the Market’ Perception of Performance.” Journal of World Business 42 (3): 322-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. M., Covin, J. G. and D. P. Slevin. 2008. “Exploring the Relationship between Strategic Reactiveness and Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Role of Structure-Style Fit.” Journal of Business Venturing 23 (3): 356-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. 1981. “Specialization of Environmental Scanning Activities among Upper Level Executives.” Journal of Management Studies 18 (3): 299-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashai, N. and T. Almor. 2004. “Gradually Internationalising “Born Global” Firms: An Oxymoron?” International Business Review 13: 465-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, J. and A. Van Stel. 2007. Export Orientation Among New Ventures and Economic Growth. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) Report Series 2007-008, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, J. and S. Terjesen. 2010. “Resource Dependency and Institutional Theory Perspectives on Direct and Indirect Export Choices.” Small Business Economics 34 (2): 203-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrant, L. 1987. “Consumer Retail Satisfaction in Rural Areas: A Reanalysis of Survey Data.” Journal of Economic Psychology 8: 19-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. and W. C. Kim. 1990. “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode.” Strategic Management Journal 11 (2): 117-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S. and K. Kyläheiko. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities and International Performance.” Journal of International Entrepreneurship 3 (3): 223-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and J. E. Vahlne. 1977. “The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment.” Journal of International Business Studies 8 (1): 23-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and J. E. Vahlne. 1990. “The Mechanism of Internationalization.” International Marketing Review 7 (4): 11-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V. and S. Young. 2009. “Does Entry Mode Matter? Reviewing Current Themes and Perspectives.” In M.V. Jones, P. Dimitratos, M. Fletcher & S. Young (Eds.), Internationalization Entrepreneurship and the Smaller Firm. Evidence from Around the World (pp. 6-19). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • JÖreskog, K. G. and D. SÖrbom. 1993. LISREL 8. Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Hillsdale: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantaridis, C. 2004. “Internationalization, Strategic Behaviour, and the Small Firm: A Comparative Investigation.” Journal of Small Business Management 43 (3): 245-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. M. and H. P. Ng. 2007. “The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Marketing Information on the Performance of SMEs.” Journal of Business Venturing 22 (4): 592-611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C. and P. Hwang. 1992. “Global Strategy and Multinationals’ Entry Mode Choice.” Journal of International Business Studies 23 (1): 29-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. 2000. “Entrepreneurship and Marketing Strategy: The SME Under Globalization.” Journal of International Marketing 8 (2): 12-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A. and S. T. Cavusgil. 2004. “Innovation, Organizational Capabilities, and the Born-Global Firm.” Journal of International Business Studies 35: 124-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J. and A. Kumar. 1993. “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (4): 467-477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D. and K. M. Weaver. 2002. “Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: A Multi-Country Analysis.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 26: 71-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen, D., Sundqvist, S. and P. Servais. 2007. “Firms’ Degree of Born-Globalness, International Entrepreneurial Orientation and Export Performance.” Journal of World Business 42 (3): 253-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanti, R., Gabrielsson, M. and P. Gabrielsson. 2007. “The Globalization Strategies of Business-to-Business Born Global Firms in the Wireless Technology Industry.” Industrial Marketing Management 36 (8): 1104-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. S., Luo, X. and Y. Shi. 2003. “Market-oriented Organizations in an Emerging Economy: A Study of Missing Links.” Journal of Business Research 56 (June): 481-491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loane, S. and J. Bell. 2006. “Rapid Internationalisation among Entrepreneurial Firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand.” International Marketing Review 23 (5): 467-485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T. and G. G. Dess. 1996. “Enriching the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct - A Reply to Entrepreneurial Orientation or Pioneer Advantage.” Academy of Management 21 (3): 605-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2001. “Equity Sharing in International Joint Ventures: An Empirical Analysis of Strategic and Environmental Determinants.” Journal of International Management 7: 31-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T. and G. G. Dess. 2000. “Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process.” Journal of Management 26: 1055-1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. 1998. “The Nature of Multinational Firm Boundaries: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities and Foreign Market Entry Mode.” International Business Review 7 (3): 259-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T. K. and P. Servais. 1997. “The Internationalization of Born Globals: An Evolutionary Process?” International Business Review 7: 561-583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J. T. and A. Özsomer. 2002. “The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance.” Journal of Marketing 66: 18-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P. and B. M. Oviatt. 1996. “New Venture Internationalization, Strategic Change, and Performance: A Follow-Up Study.” Journal of Business Venturing 11 (1): 23-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., Shane, S. and B. M. Oviatt. 1994. “Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research.” Journal of Business Venturing 9: 469-487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. and R. Varadarajan. 1992. “A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use Within Firms.” Journal of Marketing 56 (4): 53-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanow, H. and S. A. Fernhaber. 2009. “The Impact of Early Imprinting on the Evolution of New Venture Networks.” Journal of Business Venturing 24: 46-61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1983. “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms.” Management Science 29: 770-791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakos, G. and K. D. Brouthers. 2002. “Entry Mode Choice of SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27 (1): 47-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C. and S. F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability.” Journal of Marketing 54 (4): 20-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. 1994. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.” Organization Science 5 (1): 14-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. 1979. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. 1997. “Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal 18: 187-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’cass, A and D. Liem Viet Ngo. 2007. “Market Orientation Versus Innovative Culture: Two Routes to Superior Brand Performance.” European Journal of Marketing 41 (7/8): 868-887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M. and P. P. McDougall. 1994. “Toward a Theory of International New Ventures.” Journal of International Business Studies 25: 45-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M. and P. P. McDougall. 2005. “Defining International Entrepreneurship and Modelling the Speed of Internationalization.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 29 (5): 537-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y. and D. Tse. 2000. “The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes.” Journal of International Business Studies 31: 535-554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson, A. 2007. “The Strategic States Model: Strategies for Business Growth.” Business Strategy Series 8 (1): 58-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A. and Bergen, M. E. 2003. “Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A Market-Based and Resource-Based Framework.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (10): 1027-1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. and N. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879-903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S. 2005. “Toward a Knowledge-Based Conceptualisation of Internationalisation.” Journal of International Entrepreneurship 3 (1): 37-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rialp, A., Rialp, J. and G. Knight. 2005. “The Phenomenon of Early Internationalizing Firms: What Do We Know After a Decade (1993-2003) of Scientific Inquiry?” International Business Review 14 (2): 147-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., Clercq, D. and W. R. Sandberg. 2005. “Antecedents of International and Domestic Learning Effort.” Journal of Business Venturing 20: 437-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D. D. and A. Blomstermo. 2003. “The Internationalization Process of Born Globals: A Network View.” International Business Review 12: 739-753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F. and J. C. Narver. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.” Journal of Marketing 59: 63-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G. and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509-533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trulsson, P. 2002. “Constraints of Growth-Oriented Enterprises in the Southern and Eastern African Region.” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 7( 3): 331-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. 2004. “Internationalization Speed and Cost Efficiency: Evidence from Germany.” International Business Review 13: 447-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J. and A. O’cass. 2004. “Exploring the Characteristics of the Market-Driven Firms and Antecedents to Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Industrial Marketing Management 33(5): 419-428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W. and G. Knight. 2007. “Conceptualizing Accelerated Internationalization in the Born Global Firm: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective.” Journal of World Business 42 (3): 294-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Liu, B. and X. Liu. 2005. “Entry Modes of Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Multinomial Logit Approach.” Journal of Business Research 58 (11): 1495-1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D. and F. Martin. 2001. “International Market Selection Strategies of Manufacturing and Services Firms.” Entrepreneurship Regional Development 13: 17-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J. and D. A. Shepherd. 2003. “Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses.” Strategic Management Journal 24: 1307-1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J. and D. A. Shepherd. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Firm Performance: A Configurational Approach.” Journal of Business Venturing 20 (1): 71-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. “Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (2): 341-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. 2005. “A Theory of International New Ventures: A Decade of Research.” Journal of Int.Business Studies 36 (1): 20-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. and G. George. 2002. “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconcepualisation, and Extension.” Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 185-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A, Ireland, R. D. and M. A. Hitt. 2000. “International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (5): 925-950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Jennings, D. F. and D. F. Kuratko. 1999. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 24 (2): 45-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. and S. Kavul. 2005. “Capability Development, Learning and Growth in International Entrepreneurial Firms: Evidence from China.” In Shepherd D.A., Katz J.A. (Eds.), International Entrepreneurship (pp. 273-296). London: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tirado, D.M., Pérez, A.B., Meliá, M.R. (2017). Higher Commitment Entry Modes in International New Ventures: The Influence of Strategical Orientations. In: Campbell, C.L. (eds) The Customer is NOT Always Right? Marketing Orientationsin a Dynamic Business World. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50008-9_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics