Skip to main content

Acceleration of 3D Mass Digitization Processes: Recent Advances and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the heritage field, the demand for fast and efficient 3D digitization technologies for historic remains is increasing. Besides, 3D has proven to be a promising approach to enable precise reconstructions of cultural heritage objects. Even though 3D technologies and postprocessing tools are widespread and approaches to semantic enrichment and storage of 3D models are just emerging, only few approaches enable mass capture and computation of 3D virtual models from zoological and archeological findings. To illustrate how future 3D mass digitization systems may look like, we introduce CultLab3D, a recent approach to 3D mass digitization, annotation, and archival storage by the Competence Center for Cultural Heritage Digitization at the Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD. CultLab3D can be regarded as one of the first feasible approaches worldwide to enable fast, efficient, and cost-effective 3D digitization. It is specifically designed to automate the entire process and thus allows to scan and archive large amounts of heritage objects for documentation and preservation in the best possible quality, taking advantage of integrated 3D visualization and annotation within regular Web browsers using technologies such as WebGl and X3D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. European Commission: Commission recommendation of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation (2011/711/EU) [online], available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:283:0039:0045:EN:PDF. Accessed 5 June 2016

  2. European Commission: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Digital Agenda for Europe (COM(2010)245 final) [online], available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0245&from=en. Accessed 5 July 2016

  3. Article 3.3 of the Treaty of Lisbon, Treaty of Lisbon, Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, 17.12.2007 (2007/C 306/01). Official Journal of the European Union, C 306/1 [online], available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:TOC. Accessed 10 Sept 2015

  4. S. Keene (ed.), Collections for People. Museums’ stored Collections as a Public Resource (London 2008) [online], available from: discovery.ucl.ac.uk/13886/1/13886.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. To mention are the Google Books Library Project, the Google Art Project, the German Digital Library (German: Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek) or Europeana. This cultural platform and, at the same time, digital library, archive and museum was launched in 2008 with the aim to consolidate all national digital libraries under one roof and to make historic inventories and collections in digital form widely available to the public

    Google Scholar 

  6. See company website Picturae [online], available from: https://picturae.com/uk/digitising/herbarium-sheets. Accessed 28 June 2016

  7. Smithsonian Strategic Plan [online], available from: http://www.si.edu/Content/Pdf/About/SI_Strategic_Plan_2010-2015.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2016

  8. In this context, the term ‘3D digitization’ refers to the digital capture of a three-dimensional object with its shape and its visual appearance from all possible angles. For this reason, a digital replication in 3D is different to a photograph, “seeking to map the complete geometry of an object, its surface texture and where possible its visual material characteristics, and combining these to produce an integrated digital 3D model that depicts the object as accurately as possible”. Contrary to a 3D replica, which can be viewed from any angle, a photograph is a static image of an object taken from only one specific perspective. See DFG Practical Guidelines on Digitisation (2013), DFG form 12.151 – 02/13, p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Santos, S. Peña Serna, A. Stork, D. Fellner, The potential of 3D internet in the cultural heritage domain, in 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage – A Roadmap in Digital Heritage Preservation, eds. by M. Ioannides, E. Quak. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8355, (2014), pp. 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Pintus, K. Pal, Y. Yang, T. Weyrich, E. Gobbetti, H. Rushmeier, A survey of geometric analysis in cultural heritage. Comput. Graph. Forum 35(1), 4–31 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Scopigno, Sampled 3D models for cultural heritage: which uses beyond visualization? VAR 3(5), 109–125 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Digital acquisition in 3D on a broader scale is offered by the company Witikon. A large amount of collection artifacts were already digitized in high resolution with Phase One cameras as object panoramas. 3D reconstruction from object panoramas is now being offered as well. See company website Witikon [online], available from: http://www.witikon.eu/. Accessed 29 June 2016

  13. ISO/IEC 18004:2000: Information Technology. Automatic identification and data capture techniques. Bar code symbology. QR Code. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Weyrich, J. Lawrence, H. Lensch, S. Rusinkiewicz, T. Zickler, Principles of appearance acquisition and representation, in ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Classes (ACM, New York, 2008), pp. 80:1–80:119

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Holroyd, J. Lawrence, T. Zickler, A coaxial optical scanner for synchronous acquisition of 3D geometry and surface reflectance, in ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Papers (ACM, New York, 2010), pp. 99:1–99:12

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Schwartz, R. Klein, Acquisition and presentation of virtual surrogates for cultural heritage artefacts, in Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter Informatik e.V., Proceedings of EVA 2012 Berlin, pp. 50–57

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Schwartz, M. Weinmann, R. Ruiters, R. Klein, Integrated high-quality acquisition of geometry and appearance for cultural heritage, in The 12th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archeology and Cultural Heritage VAST 2011 (Eurographics Association, 2011), pp. 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Noell, J. Koehler, R. Reis, D. Stricker, Fully automatic, omnidirectional acquisition of geometry and appearance in the context of cultural heritage preservation. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (Special Issue on Best Papers from Digital Heritage 2013 JOCCH Homepage archive), 8(1), Article No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Kohler, T. Noell, G. Reis, D. Stricker, A full-spherical device for simultaneous geometry and reflectance acquisition, in Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2013 I.E. Workshop (2013), pp. 355–362

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Goesele, J. Ackermann, S. Fuhrmann, R. Klowsky, F. Langguth, P. Muecke, M. Ritz, Scene reconstruction from community photo collections. Computer 43(6), 48–53 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Hertzmann, S. Seitz, Example-based photometric stereo: shape reconstruction with general, varying BRDFs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27(8), 1254–1264 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Lens, J. Kunz, C. Trommer, A. Karguth, O. von Stryk, BioRob-Arm. A Quickly Deployable and Intrinsically Safe, Light- Weight Robot Arm for Service Robotics Applications. 41st International Symposium on Robotics (ISR 2010), 6th German Conference on Robotics (ROBOTIK 2010) pp. 905–910

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Santos, M. Ritz, R. Tausch, H. Schmedt, R. Monroy, A. De Stefano, D. Fellner, CultLab3D – On the Verge of 3D Mass Digitization, in GCH 2014, Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, eds. by R. Klein et al. (Eurographics Association, Goslar, 2014), pp. 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Lens, J. Kunz, O. von Stryk, Dynamic modeling of the 4 DoF BioRob series elastic robot arm for simulation and control, in Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots (SIMPAR 2010), vol. 6472 (Springer, 2010), pp. 411–422

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. De Stefano, R. Tausch, P. Santos, A. Kuijper, G. Di Gironimo, D.W. Fellner, B. Siciliano, Modeling a virtual robotic system for automated 3D digitization of cultural heritage artifacts. J. Cult. Herit. 19, 531–537 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Siciliano, L. Sciavicco, L. Villani, G. Oriolo, Robotics. Modelling, Planning and Control (Springer, London, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Karaszewski, R. Sitnik, E. Bunsch, On-line, collision-free positioning of a scanner during fully automated three-dimensional measurement of cultural heritage objects. Robot. Auton. Syst. 60, 1205–1219 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F. Remondino, C. Fraser, Digital Camera Calibration Methods: Considerations and Comparisons. ISPRS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. E.W. Arold, Hand-guided 3D surface acquisition by combining simple light sectioning with real-time algorithms. arXiv: 1401.1946 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Z. Zhang, A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Fisher, A comparison of algorithms for subpixel peak detection, in Image Technology, ed. by J.L.C. Sanz (Springer, Berlin, 1996), pp. 385–404

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. S.R. Berns, The Science of digitizing paintings for color-accurate image archives: a review. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 45(4), 305–325 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. ISO 15076-1:2010: Image technology colour management. Architecture, profile format, and data structure based on ICC.1:2010

    Google Scholar 

  34. IEC61966-2-1:1999: Multimedia systems and equipment. Colour measurement and management. Part 2-1: Color management-Default RGB color space. sRGB. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Schnoes, M.D. Goesele, Massively parallel SVBRDF fitting BTF data, bachelor thesis, TU Darmstadt, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  36. See company website Adlibsof [online], available from: http://www.adlibsoft.com. Accessed 28 June 2016

  37. See company website System Simulation [online], available from: http://www.ssl.co.uk. Accessed 28 June 2016

  38. Collections Trust, [online], available from: http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/collections-link/collections-management/spectrum/choose-a-cms. Accessed 29 June 2016

  39. J.H.C.H. Yu, Assessing the value of semantic annotation services for 3d museum artefacts. Sustainable Data from the Digital Research Conference (SDDR 2011) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. S.P. Serna, H. Schmedt, M. Ritz, A. Stork, Interactive semantic enrichment of 3D cultural heritage collections, in VAST: International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, eds. by D. Arnold, J. Kaminski, F. Niccolucci, A. Stork, Eurographics Symposium Proceedings, The 10th Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage (Brighton, 2012). The Eurographics Association 2012, pp. 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  41. N. Crofts, M. Doerr, T. Gill, S. Stead, M. Stiff, Definition of the cidoc conceptual reference model. ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Doerr, M. Theodoridou, Crmdig. A generic digital provenance model for scientific observation, in: 3rd Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance, TaPP’11, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 20–21, available from: https://www.usenix.org/conference/tapp11/crmdig-generic-digital-provenance-model-scientific-observation. Accessed 29 June 2016

  43. X. Pan, M. Schröttner, S. Havemann, T. Schiffer, R. Berndt, M. Hecher, D.W. Fellner, A repository infrastructure for working with 3D assets in cultural heritage. Int. J. Herit. Dig. Era 2(1), 144–166 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. P. Boulanger, M. Rioux, J. Taylor, F. Livingstone, Automatic replication and recording of museum artifacts, in Analysis and Examination of an Art Object by Imaging Technique (Tokyo National Research Institute of Cultural Properties, 1988), pp. 131–147

    Google Scholar 

  45. T. Noell, J. Koehler, R. Reis, D. Stricker, Fully automatic, omnidirectional acquisition of geometry and appearance in the context of cultural heritage preservation. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (Special Issue on Best Papers from Digital Heritage) 8(1), 2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. C. Schwartz, M. Weinmann, R. Ruiters, R. Klein, Integrated high-quality acquisition of geometry and appearance for cultural heritage. The 12th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archeology and Cultural Heritage VAST 2011 (Eurographics Association, 2011), pp. 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  47. See project website Fraunhofer innovations for cultural heritage [online], available from: https://www.igd.fraunhofer.de/en/Institut/Abteilungen/CHD/Projekte/Pilot-project-Saving-our-cultural-heritage-Fraunhofer-innovations. Accessed 8 June 2016. The project is funded by the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft and being carried out in cooperation with the Dresden State Art Collections (Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden), and the Saxon State and University Library Dresden (Sächsische Landesbibliothek, Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden)

Download references

Acknowledgments

CultLab3D is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under grant agreement 01MT12022E with support of strategic funds of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santos, P. et al. (2017). Acceleration of 3D Mass Digitization Processes: Recent Advances and Challenges. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Papagiannakis, G. (eds) Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49606-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49607-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics