Skip to main content

Risk Factors and Epidemiology of Surgical Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Patient Care
  • 2602 Accesses

Abstract

Millions of people are admitted to hospitals every year; about one-third of admissions are for a surgical procedure; unfortunately, some patients experience adverse events, resulting in harm or even death. This chapter presents an overview on ways to define and classify harm, methods to assess the scale of harm, estimates of actual harm, solutions to prevent errors and harm in the perioperative area, and approaches to the surveillance and monitoring of surgical safety. It concludes that in order to support the improvement of quality and safety in surgery, a stronger focus on the upstream determinants of safety is needed.

“You cannot swim for new horizons until you have courage to lose sight of the shore.”

—William Faulkner

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baines R, Langelaan M, de Bruijne M, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C. How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(9):561–71. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Safe Surgery Guidelines. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/tools_resources/9789241598552/en/.

  3. Hogan H, Healey F, Neale G, Thomson R, Vincent C, Black N. Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(9):737–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Barach, P., Small DS. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: Lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. British Medical Journal 2000; 320:753–763.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown C, et al. General and specific interventions across the system and evaluation end points. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:158–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lilford R, Chilton PJ, Hemming K, Brown C, Girling A, Barach P. Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points. BMJ. 2010;341:c4413.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bickler SW, Sanno-Duanda B. Epidemiology of paediatric surgical admissions to a government referral hospital in the Gambia. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:1330–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Gawande AA. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet. 2008;372:139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassera MA, Zheng B, Martinec DV, Dunst CM, Swanström LL. Surgical time independently affected by surgical team size. Am J Surg. 2009;198(2):216–22. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.10.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care. 2011;49:1076–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cassin B, Barach P. Making Sense of Root Cause Analysis Investigations of Surgery-Related Adverse Events. Surg Clin North America 2012, 1–15, doi:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008.

  12. The National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). https://report.nrls.nhs.uk/nrlsreporting/

  13. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. WHO Safe Surgery Programme. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/.

  15. Reichman DE, Greenberg JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(4):212–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Seiden, S., Barach, P. Wrong-side, wrong procedure, and wrong patient adverse events: Are they preventable? Archives of Surgery, 2006;141:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, et al. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(1):80–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM. A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No. 43. Report prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Contract No. 290-97-0013. Prepared by: University of California at San Francisco (UCSF)-Stanford University Evidence-based Practice Center. http://archive.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/.

  19. Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost P et al. Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 211. (Prepared by the Southern California-RAND Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No.290-2007-10062-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-E001-EF. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2013. www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/ptsafetyuptp.html

  20. Sanchez J, Barach P. High Reliability Organizations and Surgical Microsystems: Re-engineering Surgical Care. Surgical Clinics of North America, 02/2012; 92(1):1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.005.

  21. Taylor N, Clay-Williams R, Hogden E, Braithwaite J, Groene O. High performing hospitals: a qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Secanell M, Groene O, Arah OA, Lopez MA, Kutryba B, Pfaff H, Klazinga N, Wagner C, Kristensen S, Bartels PD, Garel P, Bruneau C, Escoval A, França M, Mora N, Suñol R, DUQuE Project Consortium. Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe (DUQuE): overview of a study of hospital quality management in seven countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26 Suppl 1:5–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sunol R, Wagner C, Arah OA, Kristensen S, Pfaff H, Klazinga N, Thompson CA, Wang A, DerSarkissian M, Bartels P, Michel P, Groene O, DUQuE Project Consortium. Implementation of departmental quality strategies is positively associated with clinical practice: results of a multicenter study in 73 hospitals in 7 European countries. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0141157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kringos DS, Sunol R, Wagner C, Mannion R, Michel P, Klazinga NS, Groene O, DUQuE Consortium. The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Groene O, Kringos D, Sunol R for the DUQUE Consortium. Seven strategies to improve the quality and safety of hospitals. http://www.duque.eu/uploads/ENG2_28jan%20015%20Erasmus%20Seven.pdf.

  26. Yao GL, Novielli N, Manaseki–Holland S, Chen FY, Klink van der M, Barach P, Chilton P, Lilford R. Evaluation of a predevelopment service delivery intervention: an application to improve clinical handovers. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(s1): i29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shojania KG, Thomas EJ. Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving? BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(4):273–7. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001935.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sunol R, Wagner C, Arah OA, Shaw CD, Kristensen S, Thompson CA, Dersarkissian M, Bartels PD, Pfaff H, Secanell M, Mora N, Vlcek F, Kutaj-Wasikowska H, Kutryba B, Michel P, Groene O, DUQuE Project Consortium. Evidence-based organization and patient safety strategies in European hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26 Suppl 1:47–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor A, Neuburger J, Walker K, Cromwell D, Groene O. How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21(2):91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barach, P; Pahl R, Butcher A. Actions and Not Words, Randwick, NSW: JBara Innovations for HQIP, National Health Service, London, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bottle A, Aylin P. Application of AHRQ patient safety indicators to English hospital data. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:303–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aylin P, Tanna S, Bottle A, Jarman B. How often are adverse events reported in English hospital statistics? BMJ. 2004;329(7462):369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Quan H, Drösler S, Sundararajan V, Wen E, Burnand B, Couris CM, Halfon P, Januel JM, Kelley E, Klazinga N, Luthi JC, et al. Adaptation of AHRQ patient safety indicators for use in ICD-10 administrative data by an International Consortium. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches, Assessment, vol. 1. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhan C, Miller MR. Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;21 Suppl 2:ii58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nolte E, Roland M, Guthrie S, Brereton L. Preventing emergency readmissions to hospital. A scoping review. Cambridge: RAND; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fischer C, Lingsma H, Hardwick R, Cromwell DA, Steyerberg E, Groene O. Risk adjustment models for short-term outcomes after surgical resection for oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103(1):105–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barach P, Lipshultz S. The benefits and hazards of publicly reported quality outcomes. Progress in in Pediatric Cardiology (2016), pp. 45–49, DOI information: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2016.06.001.

  38. Walker K, Neuburger J, Groene O, Cromwell DA, van der Meulen J. Public reporting of surgeon outcomes: low numbers of procedures lead to false complacency. Lancet. 2013;382(9905):1674–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wagner C, Thompson CA, Arah OA, Groene O, Klazinga NS, Dersarkissian M, Suñol R, DUQuE Project Consortium. A checklist for patient safety rounds at the care pathway level. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26 Suppl 1:36–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson, J and Barach, P. Quality Improvement Methods to Study and Improve the Process and Outcomes of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery. Progress in Pediatric Cardiology. 2011;32:147–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Groene PhD, MSc, MA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groene, O. (2017). Risk Factors and Epidemiology of Surgical Safety. In: Sanchez, J., Barach, P., Johnson, J., Jacobs, J. (eds) Surgical Patient Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44010-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44010-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44008-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44010-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics