Skip to main content

Who is in Control in Crowdsourcing Initiatives? An Examination of the Case of Crowdmapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Nordic Contributions in IS Research (SCIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The crowdsourcing literature is dominated by the view that the crowd can be controlled and that owners should adopt different technologies to control it and its output. This paper questions the agency and role of the crowd. Specifically, it questions how and to what extent can control over the crowd be exercised. To this end, the paper adopts an interpretive approach to the enquiry. It examines a case of crowdsourcing in the understudied area of humanitarian response. Concepts from structuration theory are adopted to interpret the data. The analysis reveals the paradox of crowd interaction and owner control in crowdsourcing. It shows the crowd to be made up of knowledgeable and reflexive groups that effectively tackle methods aimed at controlling them. The implications of the study are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Estellés-Arolas, E., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F.: Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J. Inf. Sci. 38(2), 189–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q.: Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: current status and future direction. Inf. Syst. Front. 16(3), 417–434 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarrell, A., et al.: Crowdsourcing: a snapshot of published research. In: AMCIS 2013 Proceedings (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brabham, D.C.: The myth of amateur crowds: a critical discourse analysis of crowdsourcing coverage. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(3), 394–410 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Savage, N.: Gaining wisdom from crowds. Commun. ACM 55(3), 13–15 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Howcroft, D.: The Apple business model: crowdsourcing mobile applications. Account. Forum 37(4), 280–289 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Djelassi, S., Decoopman, I.: Customers’ participation in product development through crowdsourcing: issues and implications. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42(5), 683–692 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Majchrzak, A., More, P.H.B.: Emergency! Web 2.0 to the rescue! Commun. ACM 54(4), 125–132 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodchild, M.F., Glennon, J.A.: Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. Int. J. Digit. Earth 3(3), 231–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Afuah, A., Tucci, C.L.: Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37(3), 355–375 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A.: Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 22(4), 257–268 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zogaj, S., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J.M.: Managing crowdsourced software testing: a case study based insight on the challenges of a crowdsourcing intermediary. J. Bus. Econ. 84(3), 375–405 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allahbakhsh, M., et al.: Quality control in crowdsourcing systems. IEEE Internet Comput. 17(2), 76–81 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, D.L., et al.: Quality control mechanisms for crowdsourcing: peer review, arbitration, & expertise at familysearch indexing. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kittur, A., et al.: Crowdforge: crowdsourcing complex work. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yung, D., Li, M.-L., Chang, S.: Evolutionary approach for crowdsourcing quality control. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25(6), 879–890 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Majchrzak, A., Cherbakov, L., Ives, B.: Harnessing the power of the crowds with corporate social networking tools: how IBM does it. MIS Q. Exec. 8(2), 103–108 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palen, L., Hiltz, S.R., Liu, S.B.: Online forums supporting grassroots participation in emergency preparedness and response. Commun. ACM 50(3), 54–58 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palen, L., Liu, S.B.: Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walsham, G., Han, C.-K.: Structuration theory and information systems research. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hiltunen, E.: Crowdsourcing the future: the foresight process at Finpro. J. Futur. Stud. 16(1), 189–196 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Le, J., et al.: Ensuring quality in crowdsourced search relevance evaluation: the effects of training question distribution. In: SIGIR 2010 Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Search Evaluation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poesio, M., et al.: Phrase detectives: utilizing collective intelligence for internet-scale language resource creation. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. (TiiS) 3(1), 3:1–3:44 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Giddens, A.: New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen, I.J.: Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. Macmillan, London (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Tucker, K.: Anthony Giddens and Modern Social Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Giddens, A.: Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press, Berkeley (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Giddens, A.: Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. University of California Press, Berkeley (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative Research in Information Systems (2012). http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/. Accessed 9 Nov 2012

  31. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walsham, G., Han, C.K.: Information systems strategy formation and implementation: the case of a central government agency. Acc. Manag. Inf. Technol. 3(3), 191–209 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schultze, U., Avital, M.: Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Inf. Organ. 21(1), 1–16 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17(1), 2–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pozzebon, M., Pinsonneault, A.: Challenges in conducting empirical work using structuration theory: learning from IT research. Organ. Stud. 26(9), 1353–1376 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Langley, A.: Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24(4), 691–710 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. NDRRMC: SitRep No. 108 Effects of Typhoon “Yolanda” (Haiyan) (2014). http://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1329/Effects_of_Typhoon_YOLANDA_(HAIYAN)_SitRep_No_108_03APR2014.pdf. Accessed 21 Sep 2015

  38. OpenStreetMap: Typhoon Haiyan - Tacloban Post-Disaster Imagery Mapping (2013). http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/350. Accessed 27 Nov 2014

  39. Hern, A.: Online Volunteers Map Philippines After Typhoon Haiyan (2013). http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/15/online-volunteers-map-philippines-after-typhoon-haiyan. Accessed 7 April 2014

  40. Saxton, G.D., Oh, O., Kishore, R.: Rules of crowdsourcing: models, issues, and systems of control. Inf. Syst. Manag. 30(1), 2–20 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Oleson, D., et al.: Programmatic gold: targeted and scalable quality assurance in crowdsourcing. Hum. Comput. 11, 11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Walsham, G.: Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. J. Inf. Technol. 27(2), 87–93 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul Rehman Shahid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shahid, A.R., Elbanna, A. (2016). Who is in Control in Crowdsourcing Initiatives? An Examination of the Case of Crowdmapping. In: Lundh Snis, U. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43597-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics