Skip to main content

Ecological and Social Factors Determining the Diversity of Birds in Residential Yards and Gardens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments

Abstract

Residential landscapes with private yards and gardens are a major land cover in many cities, represent a considerable opportunity for bird conservation and enhance human experiences with wildlife. The number of studies of birds in residential landscapes is increasing worldwide, but a global-scale perspective on this research is lacking. Here we review the research conducted on birds in residential settings to explore how birds respond to this novel habitat and how private gardens can be designed and managed to enhance their value for bird populations and for human well-being. We examine the key ecological and social drivers that influence birds and draw particular attention to the importance of scale, the role of bird feeding, the predation risk from cats and the relationship between native vegetation and bird diversity. The success of bird conservation initiatives in residential landscapes hinges on collaboration between a range of stakeholders, and we conclude the chapter by making recommendations for urban planners and evaluating policy tools for incentivising householders and communities to conserve birds in their neighbourhoods.

I value my garden more for being full of blackbirds than of cherries, and very frankly give them fruit for their songs.

(Joseph Addison, English essayist, poet, and politician, 1672–1719)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinnifesi F, Sileshi G, Ajayi O, Akinnifesi A, de Moura E, Linhares J, Rodrigues I (2010) Biodiversity of the urban homegardens of São Luís city, Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosyst 13(1):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281(1780). doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3330

  • Aurora A, Simpson T, Small M, Bender K (2009) Toward increasing avian diversity: urban wildscapes programs. Urban Ecosyst 12(2):347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogh AL, Ryder TB, Marra PP (2011) Population demography of Gray Catbirds in the suburban matrix: sources, sinks and domestic cats. J Ornithol 152(3):717–726. doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0648-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman AP, Boots M, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban bird declines and the fear of cats. Anim Conserv 10:320–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belaire JA, Whelan CJ, Minor ES (2014) Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape. Ecol Appl 24(8):2132–2143. doi:10.1890/13-2259.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6(2):506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair R (2004) The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecol Soc 9(5). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2/

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH (2008) The oasis effect: response of birds to exurban development in a southwestern savanna. Ecol Appl 18(5):1093–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolitzer B, Netusil NR (2000) The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. J Environ Manage 59(3):185–193. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59(11):977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnington C, Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2013) Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait-mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species. J Appl Ecol 50(1):15–24. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnington C, Gaston K, Evans K (2014) Squirrels in suburbia: influence of urbanisation on the occurrence and distribution of a common exotic mammal. Urban Ecosyst 17(2):533–546. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0331-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone C, Cadenasso M, Grove J, Schwarz K, Buckley G (2010) Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosyst 13(3):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Trust for Ornithology (2006) We spend £200 million a year on wild bird food. British Trust for Ornithology Press Release No. 2006/12/76. British Trust for Ornithology Press, Thetford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt KT, Tallamy DW, Gregory Shriver W (2009) Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conserv Biol 23(1):219–224. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01076.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon AR (1998) Garden birdwatch handbook. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon A (1999) The significance of private gardens for bird conservation. Bird Conserv Int 9(4):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon AR, Chamberlain DE, Toms MP, Hatchwell BJ, Gaston KJ (2005) Trends in the use of private gardens by wild birds in Great Britain 1995–2002. J Appl Ecol 42(4):659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catterall CP (2004) Birds, garden plants and suburban bushlots: where good intentions meet unexpected outcomes. In: Lunney D, Burgin S (eds) Urban wildlife: more than meets the eye. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 21–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DE, Cannon AR, Toms MP (2004) Associations of garden birds with gradients in garden habitat and local habitat. Ecography 27(5):589–600. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03984.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S (2007) Domesticated nature: motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. J Environ Psychol 27(3):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimaki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimaki ML, Dinetti M (2006) Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127(3):336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colding J (2007) ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 81(1–2):46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook E, Hall S, Larson K (2011) Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: a synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment. Urban Ecosyst 1–34. doi:10.1007/s11252-011-0197-0

  • Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc 12(2) http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss12/art11/

  • Cooper C, Loyd K, Murante T, Savoca M, Dickinson J (2012) Natural history traits associated with detecting mortality within residential bird communities: can citizen science provide insights? Environ Manag 50(1):11–20. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9866-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006) Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biol Conserv 133(3):326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels G, Kirkpatrick J (2016) Ecology and conservation of Australian urban and exurban avifauna. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 343–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Loram A, Irvine KN, Sims V, Gaston KJ (2009) A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol Conserv 142(4):761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A, Major RE, Taylor CE (2013) Housing shortages in urban regions: aggressive interactions at tree hollows in forest remnants. PLoS One 8(3), e59332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A, Major R, Taylor C (2014) The association between nectar availability and nectarivore density in urban and natural environments. Urban Ecosyst 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0417-5

  • Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2004) Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst 9(2):99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn EH, Tessaglia DL (1994) Predation of birds at feeders in winter (Depredación de Aves en Comederos Durante el Invierno). J Field Ornithol 65(1):8–16. doi:10.2307/4513887

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JT (1974) Urban bird community in Tuscon, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76(2):184–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans C, Abrams E, Reitsma R, Roux K, Salmonsen L, Marra PP (2005) The Neighborhood Nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv Biol 19(3):589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151(1):19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00898.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyles K, Mulvaney M (2014) Responsible pet ownership and the protection of wildlife: options for improving the management of cats in the ACT. A background paper prepared for the ACT Responsible Cat Ownership Steering Committee. http://www.feral.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/RespCatOwnershipACT2014.pdf

  • Faeth SH, Bang C, Saari S (2011) Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1223(1):69–81. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05925.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Juricic E (2000) Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol 14(2):513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Seto K, Goodness J (2013) A synthesis of global urbanization projections. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, Netherlands, pp 409–435. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Dickinson KJM, Porter S, van Heezik Y (2012) “My garden is an expression of me”: exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. J Environ Psychol 32(2):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French K, Major RE, Hely K (2005) Use of native and exotic garden plants by suburban nectarivorous birds. Biol Conserv 121:545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ (2008) Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers Distrib 14(1):131–137. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00439.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Tratalos J, Gaston KJ (2009) How many birds are there in a city of half a million people? Divers Distrib 15(2):328–337. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00537.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Davies ZG, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. Stud Avian Biol 45:249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, McNaughton EJ, Krull CR, Stanley MC (2014) Risks and drivers of wild bird feeding in urban areas of New Zealand. Biol Conserv 180:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, Stanley MC (2015) Supplementary feeding restructures urban bird communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(20):E2648–E2657. doi:10.1073/pnas.1501489112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K, Warren P, Thompson K, Smith R (2005) Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodivers Conserv 14(14):3327–3349. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-9513-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Fuller RA, Loram A, MacDonald C, Power S, Dempsey N (2007) Urban domestic gardens (XI): variation in urban wildlife gardening in the United Kingdom. Biodivers Conserv 16(11):3227–3238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germaine SS, Rosenstock SS, Schweinsburg RE, Richardson WS (1998) Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol Appl 8(3):680–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons S, Mourato S, Resende GM (2014) The amenity value of English nature: a hedonic price approach. Environ Resour Econ 57(2):175–196. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9664-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch J (2016) The role of invasive plant species in urban avian conservation. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25(2):90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2013) Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecol Econ 86:258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Garcia A, Sal AG (2008) Private urban green spaces or “Patios” as a key element in the urban ecology of tropical central America. Hum Ecol 36(2):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grarock K, Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Tidemann CR (2013) Using invasion process theory to enhance the understanding and management of introduced species: a case study reconstructing the invasion sequence of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis). J Environ Manage 129:398–409. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu JG, Bai XM, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319(5864):756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM, Troy AR, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Burch WR Jr, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2006) Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 9(4):578–597. doi:10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guralnick R, Van Cleve J (2005) Strengths and weaknesses of museum and national survey data sets for predicting regional species richness: comparative and combined approaches. Divers Distrib 11(4):349–359. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00164.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie DA (1974) Suburban bird populations in southern-California. Am Midl Nat 92(2):461–466. doi:10.2307/2424310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope D, Gries C, Zhu WX, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(15):8788–8792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M (1999) Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 45(1):15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M (2012) How biologists can involve developers, planners, and policymakers in urban avian conservation, vol 45, Urban bird ecology and conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M, Holling CS (2000) Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 4(1):25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M, Knowles-Yanez K (2003) Land use, scale, and bird distributions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landsc Urban Plan 62(2):55–68. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00096-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M, Allen W, Meurk C (2011) Conserving urban biodiversity? Creating green infrastructure is only the first step. Landsc Urban Plan 100(4):369–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter MCR, Brown DG (2012) Spatial contagion: gardening along the street in residential neighborhoods. Landsc Urban Plan 105(4):407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huste A, Boulinier T (2011) Determinants of bird community composition on patches in the suburbs of Paris, France. Biol Conserv 144:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huste A, Selmi S, Boulinier T (2006) Bird communities in suburban patches near Paris: determinants of local richness in a highly fragmented landscape. Ecoscience 13(2):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikin K, Beaty RM, Lindenmayer D, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning A (2013a) Pocket parks in a compact city: how do birds respond to increasing residential density? Landsc Ecol 28(1):45–56. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9811-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikin K, Knight E, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD (2013b) The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Divers Distrib 19(3):294–306. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00937.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inger R, Gregory R, Duffy JP, Stott I, Voříšek P, Gaston KJ (2015) Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species’ numbers are rising. Ecol Lett 18(1):28–36. doi:10.1111/ele.12387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DN, Reynolds SJ (2008) Feeding birds in our towns and cities: a global research opportunity. J Avian Biol 39(3):265–271. doi:10.1111/j.2008.0908-8857.04271.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaoma H, Shackleton C (2014) Homestead greening is widespread amongst the urban poor in three medium-sized South African towns. Urban Ecosyst 17(4):1191–1207. doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0362-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP, Warren P, Martin C, Hope D, Katti M (2005) The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol Soc 10(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss11/art23/

  • Kirkpatrick JB, Davison A, Daniels GD (2012) Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of trees in eastern Australian cities. Landsc Urban Plan 107(2):147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluza DA, Griffin CR, DeGraaf RM (2000) Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds. Anim Conserv 3:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight M (1954) Bird gardening: how to attract birds. Routledge/Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz T, Baudains C (2012) Biodiversity in the front yard: an investigation of landscape preference in a domestic urban context. Environ Behav 44(2):166–196. doi:10.1177/0013916510385542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen L, Harlan SL (2006) Desert dreamscapes: residential landscape preference and behavior. Landsc Urban Plan 78(1-2):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Mertig AG, Liu J (2004a) Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biol Conserv 115(2):191–201. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00107-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Mertig AG, Liu JG (2004b) Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes. Environ Manag 33(1):110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Machabee L, Kinzig AP, Mertig AG (2012) Who feeds the birds? A comparison across regions, vol 45, Urban Bird Ecology and Conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman SB, Warren PS (2011) The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people. Ecol Appl 21(4):1327–1339. doi:10.1890/10-0423.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman SB, Turner VK, Bang C (2012a) Homeowner associations as a vehicle for promoting native urban biodiversity. Ecol Soc 17(4):13. doi:10.5751/es-05175-170445

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman SB, Warren PS, Gan H, Shochat E (2012b) Linking foraging decisions to residential yard bird composition. PLoS One 7(8), e43497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman SB, Nislow KH, Nowak DJ, DeStefano S, King DI, Jones-Farrand DT (2014) Using urban forest assessment tools to model bird habitat potential. Landsc Urban Plan 122:29–40. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Fuller RA (2013) FORUM: sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world’s cities? J Appl Ecol 50(5):1161–1168. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12118

    Google Scholar 

  • Litteral J, Shochat E (2016) The role of landscape-scale factors in shaping urban bird communities. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 135–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc Ecol 22(4):601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loram A, Warren P, Gaston K (2008) Urban domestic gardens (XIV): the characteristics of gardens in five cities. Environ Manag 42(3):361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Ruiz MO, Brawn JD (2009) Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape. Biol Conserv 142(11):2578–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP (2013) The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nat Commun 4:1396. doi:10.1038/ncomms2380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd KAT, Hernandez SM, Carroll JP, Abernathy KJ, Marshall GJ (2013) Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras. Biol Conserv 160:183–189. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbe CS, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS (2010) Political legacy of South Africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban domestic gardens along a socio-economic gradient. Sci Res Essays 5(19):2900–2910

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12(4):604–620. doi:10.1007/s10021-009-9244-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 25(4):816–826. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT, Sheffield KJ (2012) Environmental and socio-economic factors related to urban bird communities. Austral Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02383.x

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor-Fors I, Ortega-Álvarez R (2011) Fading from the forest: bird community shifts related to urban park site-specific and landscape traits. Urban For Urban Green 10(3):239–246. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magle SB, Hunt VM, Vernon M, Crooks KR (2012) Urban wildlife research: past, present, and future. Biol Conserv 155:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CA, Warren PS, Kinzig AP (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landsc Urban Plan 69(4):355–368. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CF (2000) Thrushes now largely restricted to the built environment in eastern England. Divers Distrib 6(4):189–194. doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00084.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CF (2006) Avian species richness and numbers in the built environment: can new housing developments be good for birds? Biodivers Conserv 15(8):2365–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MassWildlife (2014) Living with wildlife: black bears in Massachusetts. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dfg/dfw/wildlife/wildlife-living/living-with-bears.pdf

  • Mathieu R, Freeman C, Aryal J (2007) Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery. Landsc Urban Plan 81(3):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey RE, Mannan RW (2012) How scale influences birds’ responses to habitat features in urban residential areas. Landsc Urban Plan 105(3):274–280. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell M, Hahs A (2013) The future of urban biodiversity research: moving beyond the ‘low-hanging fruit’. Urban Ecosyst 16(3):397–409. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0315-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez-Ackerman EJ, Santiago-Bartolomei R, Vila-Ruiz CP, Santiago LE, García-Montiel D, Verdejo-Ortiz JC, Manrique-Hernández H, Hernández-Calo E (2014) Socioeconomic drivers of yard sustainable practices in a tropical city. Ecol Soc 19(3). doi:10.5751/es-06563-190320

  • Melles S (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Habitats 1:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morancho AB (2003) A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 66(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison CA, Robinson RA, Leech DI, Dadam D, Toms MP (2014) Using citizen science to investigate the role of productivity in House Sparrow Passer domesticus population trends. Bird Study 61(1):91–100. doi:10.1080/00063657.2013.874975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munyenyembe F, Harris J, Hone J, Nix H (1989) Determinants of bird populations in an urban area. Aust J Ecol 14(4):549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wang Z, Dayrell E (2009) What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 92(3–4):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Gardening Survey (2014) http://www.todaysgardencenter.com/business-management/2013-had-the-biggest-increase-in-garden-spending-this-century/

  • Orros ME, Fellowes MDE (2012) Supplementary feeding of wild birds indirectly affects the local abundance of arthropod prey. Basic Appl Ecol 13(3):286–293. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orros ME, Fellowes MDE (2015) Widespread supplementary feeding in domestic gardens explains the return of reintroduced Red Kites Milvus milvus to an urban area. Ibis 157(2):230–238. doi:10.1111/ibi.12237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palomino D, Carrascal LM (2006) Urban influence on birds at a regional scale: a case study with the avifauna of northern Madrid province. Landsc Urban Plan 77(3):276–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons H, Major RE, French K (2006) Species interactions and habitat associations of birds inhabiting urban areas of Sydney, Australia. Austral Ecol 31:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellissier V, Cohen M, Boulay A, Clergeau P (2012) Birds are also sensitive to landscape composition and configuration within the city centre. Landsc Urban Plan 104(2):181–188. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power ER (2005) Human-nature relations in suburban gardens. Aust Geogr 36(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princé K, Zuckerberg B (2015) Climate change in our backyards: the reshuffling of North America’s winter bird communities. Glob Chang Biol 21(2):572–585. doi:10.1111/gcb.12740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed SE, Hilty JA, Theobald DM (2014) Guidelines and incentives for conservation development in local land-use regulations. Conserv Biol 28(1):258–268. doi:10.1111/cobi.12136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Paecke S, Meza L (2012) Residential gardens of Santiago, Chile: extent, distribution and vegetation cover. Rev Chil Hist Nat 84(4):581–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb GN, McDonald RA, Chamberlain DE, Bearhop S (2008) Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Front Ecol Environ 6(9):476–484. doi:10.1890/060152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson D, O’Leary R, Jones DN (2003) The practice of wildlife feeding in suburban Brisbane. Corella 27:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd H, Vala J, Schaefer V (2002) Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10(2):368–375. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.02041.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Thomas S, Wright JW (2002) Bells reduce predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus). J Zool 256(1):81–83. doi:10.1017/S0952836902000109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall C, Hatherell P (2003) A survey of strategies adopted by UK wildlife trusts in the promotion of gardening for wildlife. Environmentalist 23(1):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder TB, Reitsma R, Evans B, Marra PP (2010) Quantifying avian nest survival along an urbanization gradient using citizen- and scientist-generated data. Ecol Appl 20(2):419–426. doi:10.1890/09-0040.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoech S, Bowman R (2001) Variation in the timing of breeding between suburban and wildland Florida Scrub-Jays: do physiologic measures reflect different environments? In: Marzluff J, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Springer, New York, pp 289–306. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Guneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(40):16083–16088. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell SR, Catterall CP (1998) Bushland modification and styles of urban development: their effects on birds in south-east Queensland. Wildl Res 25(1):41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan DF, Miller C, Possingham HP, Fuller RA (2011) The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol Conserv 144(2):722–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw LM, Chamberlain D, Evans M (2008) The House Sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status. J Ornithol 149(3):293–299. doi:10.1007/s10336-008-0285-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21(4):186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2005) Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between land cover composition, housing and landscape. Landsc Ecol 20(2):235–253. doi:10.1007/s10980-004-3160-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soga M, Yamaura Y, Koike S, Gaston KJ (2014) Land sharing vs. land sparing: does the compact city reconcile urban development and biodiversity conservation? J Appl Ecol 51(5):1378–1386. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurr EB (2012) New Zealand garden bird survey: analysis of the first four years. N Z J Ecol 36(3):287–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagoll K, Manning AD, Knight E, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2010) Using bird-habitat relationships to inform urban planning. Landsc Urban Plan 98(1):13–25. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stracey CM (2011) Resolving the urban nest predator paradox: the role of alternative foods for nest predators. Biol Conserv 144(5):1545–1552. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach MW, Haase D, Kabisch N (2009) Birds and the city: urban biodiversity, land use and socioeconomics. Ecol Soc 14(2):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Rubio M, Thomlinson JR (2009) Landscape and patch-level factors influence bird communities in an urbanized tropical island. Biol Conserv 142(7):1311–1321. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushinsky JR, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Gill TK, Fuller RA (2013) How should we grow cities to minimise their biodiversity impacts? Glob Chang Biol 19(2):401–410. doi:10.1111/gcb.12055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CJ, Adler FR, Grimm NB, Groffman PM, Levin SA, Munshi-South J, Pataki DE, Pavao-Zuckerman M, Wilson WG (2014) Urban ecology: advancing science and society. Front Ecol Environ 12(10):574–581. doi:10.1890/140019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JW, Brush RO, DeGraaf RM (1973) Invite wildlife to your backyard. Natl Wildl 11:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RL, Fellowes MDE, Baker PJ (2012) Spatio-temporal variation in predation by urban domestic cats (Felis catus) and the acceptability of possible management actions in the UK. PLoS One 7(11), e49369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Evans KL, Davies RG, Newson SE, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2007) Bird densities are associated with household densities. Glob Chang Biol 13(8):1685–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay MA, St. Clair CC (2011) Permeability of a heterogeneous urban landscape to the movements of forest songbirds. J Appl Ecol 48(3):679–688. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01978.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Government (2011) National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik Y, Adams A (2014) Vulnerability of native and exotic urban birds to housing densification and changing gardening and landscaping trends. Urban Ecosyst 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0379-7

  • van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Mathieu R (2008) Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landsc Urban Plan 87:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Adams A, Gordon J (2010) Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations? Biol Conserv 143(1):121–130. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik YM, Dickinson KJM, Freeman C (2012) Closing the gap: communicating to change gardening practices in support of native biodiversity in urban private gardens. Ecol Soc 17(1):34. doi:10.5751/ES-04712-170134

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Porter S, Dickinson KM (2013) Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10021-013-9694-8

  • Warren PS, Lerman SB, Charney ND (2008) Plants of a feather: spatial autocorrelation of gardening practices in suburban neighborhoods. Biol Conserv 141(1):3–4. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren P, Harlan SL, Boone C, Lerman SB, Shochat E, Kinzig AP (2010) Urban ecology and human social organisation. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 172–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • White JG, Antos MJ, Fitzsimons JA, Palmer GC (2005) Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widows SA, Drake D (2014) Evaluating the National Wildlife Federation’s Certified Wildlife Habitat™ program. Landsc Urban Plan 129:32–43. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young KM, Daniels CB, Johnston G (2007) Species of street tree is important for southern hemisphere bird trophic guilds. Austral Ecol 32:541–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Goddard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goddard, M.A., Ikin, K., Lerman, S.B. (2017). Ecological and Social Factors Determining the Diversity of Birds in Residential Yards and Gardens. In: Murgui, E., Hedblom, M. (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics