Skip to main content

Enhancing Resiliency in Production Facilities Through Cyber Physical Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Industrial Internet of Things

Abstract

Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) in production offer the chance of enhancing the resiliency of factories as depicted by the three main pillars adaptability, robustness and efficiency. Simultaneously, they will have a large impact on the way production facilities are organized and structured. This chapter thus reviews the basic concept of CPS in factories and their three dedicated specificities—systems for production, transportation and assistance—as well as the future role of production planning systems in an integrated, digitalized production environment. In the second part, two examples covering Cyber Physical Production and Assistance Systems will be provided to familiarize the reader with the industrial application of these concepts in actual facilities. An energy-oriented manufacturing planning and control system as well as the application of smart glasses in an industrial assembly task are used for demonstration. In addition to a depiction of the structure and composition of CPS in these show cases, their improvements compared to the current state-of-the-art will be quantified to highlight the underlying potentials for resiliency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adelt P (2009) Selbstoptimierende Systeme des Maschinenbaus: Definitionen, Anwendungen, Konzepte, 1. Aufl. HNI-Verlagsschriftenreihe, Bd. 234. Heinz-Nixdorf-Inst, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  2. Auerbach T, Beckers M, Buchholz G, Eppelt U, Gloy Y, Fritz P, Al Khawli T, Kratz S, Lose J, Molitor T et al (2011) Meta-modeling for manufacturing processes. In: Jeschke S, Liu H, Schilberg D (eds) Intelligent robotics and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 199–209

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbosa J, Leitao P (2011) Simulation of multi-agent manufacturing systems using agent-based modelling platforms. In: 2011 9th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), pp 477–482

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bettenhausen D, Kowalewski S (2013) Cyber-Physical Systems: Chancen und Nutzen aus Sicht der Automation, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  5. Botthof A, Hartmann E (2015) Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. Springer Vieweg, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brecher C (ed) (2011) Integrative Produktionstechnik für Hochlohnländer. VDI-Buch, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brecher C, Müller S, Kuz S, Lohse W (2013) Towards anthropomorphic movements for industrial robots. In: Duffy V (ed) Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Human body modeling and ergonomics, vol 8026. Springer, Berlin, pp 10–19

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broy M (2010) Cyber-Physical Systems: Innovation Durch Software-Intensive Eingebettete Systeme. Acatech DISKUTIERT, vol 0. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Broy M, Geisberger E (2012) AgendaCPS: Integrierte Forschungsagenda; Cyber-Physical Systems. acatech-Studie [1]. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brunner FJ (2008) Japanische Erfolgskonzepte: Kaizen, KVP, Lean Production Management, Total Productive Maintenance, Shopfloor Management, Toyota Production Management. Praxisreihe Qualitätswissen. Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bullinger H, Hompel M (2007) Internet der Dinge. www.internet-der-dinge.de. VDI, Springer, Berlin [u.a.]

  12. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2012) Zukunftsprojekte der Hightech-Strategie (HTS-Aktionsplan). Bericht der Bundesregierung, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (2013) Multimodale Sensorik-Konzepte der Umwelt erkennung/-modellierung. Leitfaden im Rahmen des Technologieprogramms Autonomik, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carvalho H, Cruz Machado V (2006) Fuzzy set theory to establish resilient production systems. In: IIE Annual Conference

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen S-H, Yeh C-H (2002) On the emergent properties of artificial stock markets: the efficient market hypothesis and the rational expectations hypothesis. J Econ Behav Organ 49(2):217–239. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00068-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Cucker F, Smale S (2007) Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 52(5):852–862

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. CyProS Produktivitäts- und Flexibilitätssteigerung durch die Vernetzung intelligenter Systeme in der Fabrik (2015). www.projekt-cypros.de

  18. Das Auge als Bildschirm: Datenbrille lasert direkt auf die Netzhaut (2015) Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dlugosch G (2015) Datenbrille bringt Durchblick im Lager. VDI Nachrichten

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dumke R, Mencke S, Wille C (2010) Quality assurance of agent-based and self-managed systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eversheim W, Schuh G (2014) Produktion und management. Springer, [S.l.]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gausemeier J (2009) Selbstoptimierende Systeme des Maschinenbaus, Definitionen und Konzepte. Westfalia Druck, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jennings NR, Wooldridge MJ (1998) Agent technology: foundations, applications, and markets. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kagermann H (2013) Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0: Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0, Frankfurt (Main)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kamiske GF, Brauer J (2011) Qualitätsmanagement von A–Z: Wichtige Begriffe des Qualitätsmanagements und ihre Bedeutung, 7, aktualisierte Auflage. Hanser, Carl, München

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laird J (2012) The Soar cognitive architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee EA (2013) Cyber-Physical systems: a rehash or a new intellectual challenge. Distinguished speaker series, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martin-Breen P, Anderies JM (2011) Resilience: a literature review. Rockefeller Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. McKinsey Global Institute (2015) The Internet of Things: mapping the value beyond the hype

    Google Scholar 

  31. Monostori L, Váncza J, Kumara SRT (2006) Agent-based systems for manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55(2):697–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nyhuis P et al (2008) Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme. Heute die Industrie von morgen gestalten. PZH Produktionstechnisches Zentrum, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  33. Onori M, Lohse N, Barata J, Hanisch C (2012) The IDEAS project: plug & produce at shop-floor level. Assembly Autom 32(2):124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parunak HVD (1988) Manufacturing experience with the contract net. In: Huhns MN (ed) Distributed artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, California

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reinhard G, Krug S (2012) Automatic configuration (plug & produce) of robot systems—data-interpretation and exchange. In: Enabling manufacturing competitiveness and economic sustainability: proceedings of the 4th international conference on changeable, agile, reconfigurable and virtual production, pp 147–152

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schmitt R (2011) Selbstoptimierende Produktionssysteme. In: Brecher C (ed) Integrative Produktionstechnik für Hochlohnländer. Springer, Berlin, pp 747–1057

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schmitt, R et al (2010) Cognition-based self-optimisation of an automotive rear-axle-drive production process. J Mach Eng 10(3):68–77

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmitt R, Permin E (2013) Characterization of future key performance indicators and constraints for self-optimizing assembly systems. In: Schmitt R (ed) Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on measurement technologies and intelligent instruments. Shaker, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schmitt R, Permin E, Losse S (2014) Achieving resource- and energy-efficient system optima for production chains using cognitive self-optimization. In: Selinger G (ed) Proceedings of the 11th global conference on sustainable manufacturing, pp 570–575

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sedlacek K (2010) Emergenz: Strukturen der Selbstorganisation in Natur und Technik: Arbeits- und Handbuch, 1st edn. Books on Demand, Norderstedt

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sheffi Y (2005) The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shingō S (1996) Quick changeover for operators: the SMED system., Shopfloor seriesThe Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spath D, Ganschar O (2013) Produktionsarbeit der Zukunft: Industrie 4.0, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vogel-Heuser B, Pohl J, Hausmanns C, Michel B (2015) Alles neu macht Industrie 4.0. In: Produktion 11/2015

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wagels C, Schmitt R (2012) Benchmarking of methods and instruments for self-optimization in future production systems. Procedia CIRP 3:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wea S (2011) Virtuelle Produktionssysteme. In: Brecher C (ed) Integrative Produktionstechnik für Hochlohnländer. Springer, Berlin, pp 257–464

    Google Scholar 

  47. Westkämper E (2006) Einführung in die Organisation der Produktion, 1st edn. Springer-Lehrbuch, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Schmitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitt, R., Permin, E., Kerkhoff, J., Plutz, M., Böckmann, M.G. (2017). Enhancing Resiliency in Production Facilities Through Cyber Physical Systems. In: Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Song, H., Rawat, D. (eds) Industrial Internet of Things. Springer Series in Wireless Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42559-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42559-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42558-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42559-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics