Skip to main content

Global Institutions and Their Engagement with Disability Mainstreaming in the South: Development and (Dis)Connections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disability in the Global South

Abstract

With the increase of disability activism internationally, various global institutions and international development organisations have started to mainstream disability in their work, mostly at the level of rhetoric. Many have also developed disability statements and policies to guide their work. This chapter explores these developments, examining what strategies such organisations have adopted to introduce the disability strand in their work. At the same time, we provide a critique of how efforts at mainstreaming or including disability in their work are translated into practice. In the process, we expose some barriers that continue to maintain disability on the peripheries of inclusive development; and practices that sometimes may work to the detriment of disabled people’s emancipation. We also briefly critique the World Report on Disability, exploring the possibilities of it being used as a catalyst to the institutions’ disability mainstreaming efforts. We draw on additional examples emerging from Africa where we reside, in search for promising practices, where there is genuine disability mainstreaming by international agencies in trying to understand disability as an ubuntu and development agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 2, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Habib, L. (1997). Gender and disability. London: Oxfam.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Africa Disability Alliance. (2014). Draft SADC inclusive education strategy. Pretoria: Africa Disability Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, B., & Harrison, M. (2006). Lessons from the disability knowledge and research programme. In B. Albert (Ed.), In or out of the mainstream? Lessons from Research on Disability and Development Cooperation (pp. 1–12). Retrieved November 9, 2013, from https://www.uea.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.3897!offprint_ch1.pdf.

  • Bickenbach, J. (2011). The world report on disability. Disability & Society, 26(5), 655–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBM. (2008). CBM and the twin-track approach to disability and development. Retrieved March 23, 2014, from http://www.cbm.org/article/downloads/54741/TwinTrack_Paper_final_version_October2008.pdf.

  • Chataika, T. (2012). Postcolonialism, disability and development. In D. Goodley & B. Hughes (Eds.), Social theories of disability: New developments and directions (pp. 252–269). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chataika, T. (2013). Gender and disability mainstreaming training manual. Disabled Women in Africa: GIZ Sector Initiative Persons with Disabilities on behalf of BMZ, Germany, pp 1–75. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from http://www.diwa.ws/index.php?option=com_phocadownload.

  • Chataika, T., Kallon, F., Mji, G., & MacLachlan, M. (2011). The African Policy on Disability & Development (A-PODD) project in Sierra Leone. Dublin: A Centre for Global Health. Did What? The Global Health Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, P. (2007). Economic empowerment. In T. Barron & P. Amerena (Eds.), Disability and inclusive development. London: Lenard Cheshire International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. H., & Loeb, M. (in press). Counting disabled people: Historical perspectives and the challenges of disability statistics. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, D., Miller, U., Gude, A., Pruisken, A., & Rischewski, D. (2009). Making poverty reduction inclusive: Experiences from Cambodia, Tanzania and Vietnam. Journal of International Development, 21(5), 673–684. doi:10.1002/jid.1595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Partnership for Disability and Development [GPDD]. (n.d.). GPDD Report for OHCHR on Article 32. GPDD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2009). Disability, poverty and development: Critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability & Society, 24(6), 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2011). Comment from the field: Disability and the majority world: Challenging dominant epistemologies. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, 5(2), 217–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groce, N. (2011). Disability and the millennium development goals: A review of the MDG process and strategies for inclusion of disability issues in millennium development goal effort. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. & Enfield, S. (2003). Disability, Equality and Human Rights: A Training Manual for Development and Humanitarian Organisations. An Oxfam Publication in association with Action Aid on Disability and Development (ADD). Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, J., Posarac, A., Nicoli, M., Peffley, K., McClain-Nhlapo, C., & Keogh, M. (2010). Disability and International Cooperation and Development: A review of policies and practices. Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 1003. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbeki, T. (1998). Africa—The time has come. Cape Town: Tafelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J. A. (2011). Disability activism and participation. In T. Lorenzo (Ed.), Disability Catalyst Africa Series 1 (pp. 13–21). Cape Town: Disability Innovations Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., McConkey, R., & Adnams, C. (2013). Intellectual disability in Africa: Implications for research and service development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(20), 1750–1755. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.751461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H. (2008). Contextualizing disability: Developing southern/global theory. Keynote paper presented to 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster University, UK 2nd - 4th September 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwendwa, T. N., Murangira, A., & Lang, R. (2009). Mainstreaming the rights of persons with disabilities in national development frameworks. Journal of International Development, 21, 662–672. doi:10.1002/jid.1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ncube, J. M. (2005). Capacity building of disabled people’s organisations in Mozambique. Disability Knowledge and Research. Retrieved July 7, 2014, from http://hpod.org/pdf/CapacityBuilding.pdf.

  • Owusu-Ansah, F. E., & Mji, G. (2013). African indigenous knowledge and research. African Journal of Disability, 2(1), 5. doi:10.4102/ajod.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ptyushkin, P., Vidmar, G., Burger, H., MarinÄŤek, ÄŚ., & Escorpizo, R. (2011). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in vocational rehabilitation and disability assessment in Slovenia: State of law and users’ perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(2), 130–136. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.488713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldatic, K. (2013). Transnational Justice: Disability praxis and the politics of impairment, Disability & Society, 28(6), 744–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutu, D. (1999). No Future Without Forgiveness. Pretoria: Image.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1994). The standard rules on equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities: UN, Unit Disabled Persons. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2013a). Outcome document of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the realization of the Millennium Development Goals and other internationally agreed development goals for persons with disabilities: The way forward, a disability-inclusive development agenda towards 2015 and beyond. In S. General (Ed.), Social development: Social development, including questions relating to the world social situation and to youth, ageing, disabled persons and the family. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2013b). The way forward: A disability-inclusive development agenda towards 2015 and beyond. In S. General (Ed.), New York Social development: Social development, including questions relating to the world social situation and to youth, ageing, disabled persons and the family (Vol. Sixty eighth session). New York: UN

    Google Scholar 

  • Union, A. (2010). Continental plan of action for the African decade of persons with disabilities 2010–2019. African Union: Addis Ababa.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (1982). World programme of action concerning disabled persons. New York: UN. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=23#10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wazakili, M., Chataika, T., Mji, G., Dube, A. K., & MacLachlan, M. (2011). The social inclusion of persons with disabilities in poverty reduction policies and instruments: Initial impressions from Malawi and Uganda. In A. H. Eide & B. Ingstad (Eds.), Disability and poverty: A global challenge (pp. 15–29). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Vision, UK. (2007). Education’s Missing Millions: Including disabled children in education through EFA FTI processes and national sector plans. Milton Keynes: World Vision, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, M. (2001). International Organizations. In the Oxford companion to politics of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from http://oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195117394.001.0001/acref-9780195117394-e-0366.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsitsi Chataika .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chataika, T., McKenzie, J.A. (2016). Global Institutions and Their Engagement with Disability Mainstreaming in the South: Development and (Dis)Connections. In: Grech, S., Soldatic, K. (eds) Disability in the Global South. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42486-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42488-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics