Abstract
We review results about the structure of administration of chemotherapeutic anti-cancer treatment that we have obtained from an analysis of minimally parameterized mathematical models using methods of optimal control. This is a branch of continuous-time optimization that studies the minimization of a performance criterion imposed on an underlying dynamical system subject to constraints. The scheduling of anti-cancer treatments has all the features of such a problem: treatments are administered in time and the interactions of the drugs with the tumor and its microenvironment determine the efficacy of therapy. At the same time, constraints on the toxicity of the treatments need to be taken into account. The models we consider are low-dimensional and do not include more refined details, but they capture the essence of the underlying biology and our results give robust and rather conclusive qualitative information about the administration of optimal treatment protocols that strongly correlate with approaches taken in medical practice. We describe the changes that arise in optimal administration schedules as the mathematical models are increasingly refined to progress from models that only consider the cancerous cells to models that include the major components of the tumor microenvironment, namely the tumor vasculature and tumor-immune system interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
André N, Padovani L, Pasquier E (2011) Metronomic scheduling of anticancer treatment: the next generation of multitarget therapy? Future Oncol 7(3):385–394
Benzekry S, Hahnfeldt P (2013) Maximum tolerated dose versus metronomic scheduling in the treatment of metastatic cancers. J Theor Biol 335:233–244
Billy F, Clairambault J, Fercoq O (2012) Optimisation of cancer drug treatments using cell population dynamics. In: Ledzewicz U, Schättler H, Friedman A, Kashdan E (eds) Mathematical methods and models in biomedicine. Springer, New York, pp 265–309
Friedman A (2012) Cancer as multifaceted disease. Math Model Nat Phenom 7:1–26
Friedman A, Kim Y (2011) Tumor cell proliferation and migration under the influence of their microenvironment. Math Biosci Engr – MBE 8(2):371–383
Gatenby RA (2009) A change of strategy in the war on cancer. Nature 459:508–509. doi:10.1038/459508a
Gatenby RA, Silva AS, Gillies RJ, Frieden BR (2009) Adaptive therapy. Cancer Res 69:4894–4903
Goldie JH, Coldman A (1998) Drug resistance in cancer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hahnfeldt P, Panigrahy D, Folkman J, Hlatky L (1999) Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: a dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy. Cancer Res 59:4770–4775
Hanahan D, Bergers G, Bergsland E (2000) Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Clin Invest 105(8):145–147
Hao YB, Yi SY, Ruan J, Zhao L, Nan KJ (2014) New insights into metronomic chemotherapy- induced immunoregulation. Cancer Lett 354(2):220–226
Jain RK (2001) Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med 7:987–989
Jain RK, Munn LL (2007) Vascular normalization as a rationale for combining chemotherapy with antiangiogenic agents. Princ Pract Oncol 21:1–7
Kamen B, Rubin E, Aisner J, Glatstein E (2000) High-time chemotherapy or high time for low dose? J Clin Oncol 18:2935–2937
Kerbel RS (1997) A cancer therapy resistant to resistance. Nature 390:335–336
Kerbel RS (2000) Tumor angiogenesis: past, present and near future. Carcinogensis 21:505–515
Klement G, Baruchel S, Rak J, Man S, Clark K, Hicklin DJ, Bohlen P, Kerbel RS (2000) Continuous low-dose therapy with vinblastine and VEGF receptor-2 antibody induces sustained tumor regression without overt toxicity. J Clin Invest 105(8):R15–R24
Kuznetsov VA, Makalkin IA, Taylor MA, Perelson AS (1994) Nonlinear dynamics of immunogenic tumors: parameter estimation and global bifurcation analysis. Bull Math Biol 56:295–321
Ledzewicz U, Amini B, Schättler H (2015) Dynamics and control of a mathematical model for metronomic chemotherapy. Math Biosci, MBE 12(6):1257–1275. doi:10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1257
Ledzewicz U, Bratton K, Schättler H (2014) A 3-compartment model for chemotherapy of heterogeneous tumor populations. Acta Appl Math 135(1):191–207. doi:10.1007/s10440-014-9952-6
Ledzewicz U, FarajiMosalman MS, Schättler H (2013) Optimal controls for a mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions under targeted chemotherapy with immune boost. Discr Cont Dyn Syst Ser B 18:1031–1051. doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1031
Ledzewicz U, Naghnaeian M, Schättler H (2012) Optimal response to chemotherapy for a mathematical model of tumor-immune dynamics. J Math Biol 64:557–577. doi:10.1007/s00285-011-0424-6
Ledzewicz U, Schättler H (2002) Optimal bang-bang controls for a 2-compartment model in cancer chemotherapy. J Optim Theory Appl – JOTA 114:609–637
Ledzewicz U, Schättler H (2005) The influence of PK/PD on the structure of optimal control in cancer chemotherapy models. Math Biosci Eng (MBE) 2(3):561–578
Ledzewicz U, Schättler H (2007) Antiangiogenic therapy in cancer treatment as an optimal control problem. SIAM J Control Optim 46(3):1052–1079
Ledzewicz U, Schättler H (2014) On optimal chemotherapy for heterogeneous tumors. J Biol Syst 22(2):1–21
Ledzewicz U, Schättler H (2014) Tumor microenvironment and anticancer therapies: an optimal control approach. In: A d’Onofrio, A Gandolfi (eds) Mathematical Oncology, Springer
Ledzewicz U, Schättler H, Reisi Gahrooi M, Mahmoudian Dehkordi S (2013) On the MTD paradigm and optimal control for multi-drug cancer chemotherapy. Math Biosci Eng (MBE) 10(3):803–819. doi:10.3934/mbe.2013.10.803
Lorz A, Lorenzi T, Hochberg ME, Clairambault J, Berthame B (2013) Population adaptive evolution, chemotherapeutic resistance and multiple anti-cancer therapies. ESAIM: Math Model Numer Anal 47:377–399. doi:10.1051/m2an/2012031
Lorz A, Lorenzi T, Clairambault J, Escargueil A, Perthame B (2015) Effects of space structure and combination therapies on phenotypic heterogeneity and drug resistance in solid tumors. Bull Math Biol 77:1–22
Moore H, Li NK (2004) A mathematical model for chronic myelogeneous leukemia (CML) and T cell interaction. J Theor Biol 227:513–523
Nanda S, Moore H, Lenhart S (2007) Optimal control of treatment in a mathematical model of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Math Biosci 210:143–156
Norton L, Simon R (1986) The Norton-Simon hypothesis revisited. Cancer Treat Rep 70:41–61
d‘Onofrio A, Ledzewicz U, Maurer H, Schättler H (2009) On optimal delivery of combination therapy for tumors. Math Biosci 222:13–26. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2009.08.004
Pasquier E, Kavallaris M, André N (2010) Metronomic chemotherapy: new rationale for new directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:455–465
Pasquier E, Ledzewicz U (2013) Perspective on “more is not necessarily better”: metronomic chemotherapy. Newsl Soc Math Biol 26(2):9–10
Pietras K, Hanahan D (2005) A multi-targeted, metronomic and maximum tolerated dose ‘chemo- switch’ regimen is antiangiogenic, producing objective responses and survival benefit in a mouse model of cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:939–952
Schättler H, Ledzewicz U (2012) Geometric optimal control. Springer, New York
Schättler H, Ledzewicz U (2015) Optimal control for mathematical models of cancer therapies. Springer, New York
Schättler H, Ledzewicz U, Amini B (2016) Dynamical properties of a minimally parameterized mathematical model for metronomic chemotherapy. J Math Biol 72:1255–1280. doi:10.1007s/00285-015-0907y
Stepanova NV (1980) Course of the immune reaction during the development of a malignant tumour. Biophysics 24:917–923
Swierniak A (1988) Optimal treatment protocols in leukemia – modelling the proliferation cycle, Proc. 12th IMACS World Congress, Paris, vol 4, pp 170–172
Swierniak A (1995) Cell cycle as an object of control. J Biol Syst 3:41–54
Swierniak A, Ledzewicz U, Schättler H (2003) Optimal control for a class of compartmental models in cancer chemotherapy. Int J Appl Math Comp Sci 13:357–368
Weitman SD, Glatstein E, Kamen BA (1993) Back to the basics: the importance of ‘concentration x time’ in oncology. J Clin Oncol 11:820–821
Acknowledgment
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under collaborative research Grants Nos. DMS 1311729/1311733. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ledzewicz, U., Schaettler, H. (2016). Optimizing Chemotherapeutic Anti-cancer Treatment and the Tumor Microenvironment: An Analysis of Mathematical Models. In: Rejniak, K. (eds) Systems Biology of Tumor Microenvironment. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 936. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42023-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42023-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42021-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42023-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)