Abstract
This article explores evaluative discourse in a corpus sample of parents’ vlogs (video blogs) and blogs (henceforth v/ blogs) dealing with family tasks and responsibilities, as a reflection of underlying values concerning parenthood. It pays special attention to the important role played by the expression of attitude, understood as “ways of feeling” and including the meanings of affect, judgment and appreciation, together with positive politeness in the social practices of the discursive construction of online and off-line parenthood. Analysis and description of the data show two main patterns in parents’ practices, either aiming at perfection through juggling and multi-tasking or building resistance to the demands of families and society. Results show that parents frequently exploit the system of affect for building positive face and rapport, while indirectly expressing judgment of social esteem and social sanction, which construct their identities as mothers and fathers and those of the members of their communities of practice. The corpus for the study consists of a random sample of 400 evaluative units in posts and comments on v/ blogs dealing with family tasks and responsibilities (200 in English and 200 in Spanish, with half the sample being drawn from fathers’ and the other half from mothers’ v/ blogs). I will approach the analysis of the data from appraisal (Martin JR, White PRR, The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2005; Bednarek M, Emotion talk across corpora. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills/New York, 2008) and politeness theory (Brown P, Levinson S, Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987) in order to explore the features of evaluative discourse and the management of face. The methodology for processing the data borrows quantitative techniques from Corpus Linguistics, involving coding and statistical treatment of the sample with UAM Corpus Tools (O’Donnell M, UAM Corpus Tool 3.2. UAM, Madrid, 2011), together with Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis (DA), as done in some previous research (Santamaría-García C, Int J Corpus Linguistics, 16(3):346–371, 2011, Santamaría-García C, Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. In: Thompson G, Alba-Juez L (eds) Evaluation in context John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp 387–411, 2014).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1990). Social identity theory. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion talk across Corpora. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Bristow, J. (2006). Why I won’t be joining the ‘Bad Mothers Club’. Accessed 31 March at http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/2666#.VwBQMY9OKyJ
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calhoun, C. (1994). Social theory and the politics of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cameron, F. R. (2011). From mitigation to creativity: The agency of museums and science centres and the means to govern climate change. Museum and Society, 9(2), 90–106.
Carrington, V. (2015). Digital discourse@public space: Flows of language online and offline. In R. Jones, A. Christoph, & A. Hafner (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices (pp. 144–157). London: Routledge.
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London/New York: Routledge.
Channell, J. (2000). Corpus analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 38–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coates, J. (1997). Competing discourses of feminity. In H. Kothoff & R. Wodak (Eds.), Communicating gender in context (pp. 285–313). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dippold, D. (2009). Face and self-presentation in spoken L2 discourse: Renewing the research agenda in interlanguage pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6–1, 1–28.
Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politenesss theories. Manchester: St Jerome.
Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gibbs, R. (1999). Researching metaphor. In L. Cameron & G. D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 29–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gleason, P. (1983). Identifying identity: A semantic history. Journal of American History, 69, 910–31.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City: Doubleday.
Gumperz, J. (Ed.). (1982). Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004) [1994/1985]. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold. (Third edition revised by Matthiessen).
Hidalgo Downing, L. (2015). Linguistic creativity: Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 107–128). London: Routledge.
Jones, R. (2010). Creativity and discourse. World Englishes, 29(4), 467–480.
Jones, R. (Ed.). (2012). Discourse and creativity. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Jones, R., Christoph, A., & Hafner, A. (Eds.). (2015). Discourse and digital practices. Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. London: Routledge.
Joseph, J. (2004). Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kroskrity, P. (1993). Language, history and identity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Lakoff, R., & Ide, S. (2005). Broadening the horizons of linguistic politeness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lantigua, I. F. (2016). La rebelión de los #padrazos. El Mundo. Accessed 15 Mar 2016 at http://www.elmundo.es/sociedad/2016/03/12/56e326c9268e3eb6508b4642.html
Le Page, R., & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and language. Theory and practice. London: Hodder Education.
Locher, M., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of disourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Maybin, J., & Swann, J. (Eds.). (2006). The art of English: Everyday creativity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Merchant, G. (2015). ‘It’s changed my life’: iPhone as technological artefact. In R. Jones, A. Christoph, & A. Hafner (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices (pp. 158–174). London: Routledge.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Donnell, M. (2011). UAM Corpus Tool 3.2.. Madrid: UAM.
Riley, P. (2006). Self-expression and the negotiation of identity in a foreign language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 295–318.
Romero-Trillo, J. (2014). New empirical and theoretical paradigms in Corpus pragmatics, an introduction. In Yearbook of Corpus linguistics and pragmatics. New York: Springer.
Santamaría-García, C. (2011). Bricolage assembling: CL, CA and DA to explore the negotiation of agreement in English and Spanish conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 346–371.
Santamaría-García, C. (2013). A compelling need to evaluate: Social networking sites as tools for the expression of affect, judgment and appreciation. In I. Kecskes & J. Romero-Trillo (Eds.), Intercultural pragmatics (pp. 459–478). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Santamaría García, C. (2014). Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 387–411). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking. London/New York: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002). Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 11–45). London: Continuum.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, G., & Spencer, S. (Eds.). (2004). Social identities: Multidisciplinary approaches. London: Routledge.
Thompson, G. (2011). Russian dolls, target-VALUE mismatches, and evaluation. In Plenary at Int-eval, International workshop on the evaluative function of language: Evaluation across text-types and cultures. Madrid: UNED.
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of disourse (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, J., & Giles, H. (Eds.). (1981). Intergroup behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.
Walden, S. (2015) Six of the best dad blogs on the Internet Accessed Mar 2016 at: http://mashable.com/2015/06/15/best-dad-blogs/#T.arvDuMzmq2
Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watts, R., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K. (2005). Politeness in language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vlogs and Blogs Mentioned
Dad street http://www.dadstreet.com
Dadand https://dadand.com
Madres estresadas http://madresestresadas.com
Madresfera http://www.madresfera.com/
Malas madres http://www.malasmadres.com
Mumsnet http://www.mumsnet.com
Tots 100 http://www.tots100.co.uk/
Working Mom’s Break http://www.workingmomsbreak.com/
Acknowledgments
This paper has been written while doing research for the project “EMO-FUNDETT: EMOtion and language ‘at work’: The discursive emotive/evaluative FUNction in DiffErent Texts and contexts within corporaTe and institutional work”, I + D FFI2013-47792-C2-1-P, sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and directed by Dr. Laura Alba Juez (UNED, Spain) http://www2.uned.es/proyectofundett.
I also want to thank all the v/ bloggers who contributed to the corpus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santamaría-García, C. (2016). Connected Parents: Combining Online and Off-Line Parenthood in Vlogs and Blogs. In: Romero-Trillo, J. (eds) Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41732-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41733-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)