Skip to main content

Conjoint Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral for Heterogeneous Product Sets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2016)

Abstract

We propose an axiomatization of the Choquet integral model for the general case of a heterogeneous product set \(X = X_1 \times \ldots \times X_n\). In MCDA elements of X are interpreted as alternatives, characterized by criteria taking values from the sets \(X_i\). Previous axiomatizations of the Choquet integral have been given for particular cases \(X = Y^n\) and \(X = \mathbb {R}^n\). However, within multicriteria context such indenticalness, hence commensurateness, of criteria cannot be assumed a priori. This constitutes the major difference of this paper from the earlier axiomatizations. In particular, the notion of “comonotonicity” cannot be used in a heterogeneous structure, as there does not exist a “built-in” order between elements of sets \(X_i\) and \(X_j\). However, such an order is implied by the representation model. Our approach does not assume commensurateness of criteria. We construct the representation and study its uniqueness properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If it is empty for all z, other axioms entail the existence of an additive representation on X.

  2. 2.

    Due to our assumption that for no \(a_i, b_i\) we have \(a_iz_{-i} \sim b_iz_{-i}\) for all \(z_{-i}\), we can’t have \(p^{x_iz_{-i}}=0\) for all \(z_{-i}\).

References

  1. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M.: A conjoint measurement approach to the discrete Sugeno integral. In: Brams, S.J., Gehrlein, W.V., Roberts, F.S. (eds.) The Mathematics Preference, Choice and Order, pp. 85–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Debreu, G.: Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75(4), 643–669 (1961)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilboa, I.: Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econ. 16(1), 65–88 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. 4OR Q. J. Oper. Res. 6(1), 1–44 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158(2), 271–292 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Köbberling, V., Wakker, P.P.: Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: a generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28(3), 395–423 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundation of Measurement. Additive and Polynomial Representations, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Labreuche, C.: An axiomatization of the Choquet integral and its utility functions without any commensurability assumption. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2012, Part IV. CCIS, vol. 300, pp. 258–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Quiggin, J.: A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3(4), 323–343 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley Publications in Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 57(3), 571–587 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Timonin, M.: Axiomatization of the Choquet integral for 2-dimensional heterogeneous product sets (2015). arXiv:1507.04167

  15. Timonin, M.: Axiomatization of the Choquet integral for heterogeneous product sets (2016). arXiv:1603.08142

  16. Wakker, P.: Additive representations of preferences, a new foundation of decision analysis; the algebraic approach. In: Doignon, J.-P., Falmagne, J.-C. (eds.) Mathematical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology, pp. 71–87. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Wakker, P.: Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. i. the algebraic approach. J. Math. Psychol. 35(4), 501–531 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail Timonin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Timonin, M. (2016). Conjoint Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral for Heterogeneous Product Sets. In: Carvalho, J., Lesot, MJ., Kaymak, U., Vieira, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 610. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40595-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40596-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics