Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability Science as the Next Step in Urban Planning and Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Science: Field Methods and Exercises

  • 832 Accesses

Abstract

The urban planning and design disciplines have repeatedly failed to build sustainable communities that are economically, environmentally, and socially viable and resilient. Sustainability science has the potential to be combined with the fields of urban planning and design, which primarily focus on the physical shape of the city, to develop new methodologies for building sustainable communities. To verify this, the present chapter aims to explore potential overlaps by identifying the field methodologies and focus of urban planners and designers, and that of sustainability scientists, through a multifaceted literature review. The narrative review carried out identified that methodologies applied within contemporary urban planning and design are not suitable to incorporate and solve underlying urban issues such as inequality or gentrification. The causes for this are likely related to the fundamental limitations present in urban planning, which has evolved from architecture, design, and engineering backgrounds that tend to have a specific vision of development predominantly dealing with design aspects and a focus on hard infrastructure. To overcome this issue, the authors discuss the potential role that sustainability science could play in opening up the field of urban planning and making it deal with underlying issues through the implementation of mixed methodologies (such as spatial analysis techniques, participatory tools, and qualitative or quantitative surveys) that can capture both the scientific reality and the contextual situation. Such mixed methods can provide a field researcher with broad problem identification tools, rather than focusing on specific physical and mostly morphological elements. In addition, the application of sustainability science could provide evidence for urban planning and design juries, inhabitants, and decision makers to make calculated long-term decisions. Essentially, the present chapter argues that sustainability science can shift the methodologies used within planning and design towards the use of scientifically-oriented methodologies that help decision-makers create sustainable communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such as for example by increasing the height of seawalls to protect against storm surges in coastal regions.

  2. 2.

    A lack of human scale here refers to cities with dimensions either too big or small for humans to use efficiently.

References

  • Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Soliman, T.M.A. (1988). City beautification, public demand, and environmental priorities in the cities of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 5(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J., & Voogd, H. (1990). Selling the city: Marketing approaches in public sector urban planning (p. 177). Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. D., & Corry, R. C. (2011). Evidence-based landscape architecture: The maturing of a profession. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 327–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., Chidzero, B., & Fadika, L., et al. (1987). Our Common Future (‘Brundtland report’). In G. Brundtland, M. Khalid, S. Agnelli, S. Al-Athel, B. Chidzero, L. Fadika, et al. (Eds.). USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E., Jenks, M., & Williams, K. (2003). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? (p. 310). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2010). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design (p. 330). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changnon, S. A., Kunkel, K. E., & Reinke, B. C. (1996). Impacts and responses to the 1995 heat wave: A call to action. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 1497–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Portzamparc, C. (1995). Des situations plurielles, toujours singulières. L’architecture D’aujourd’hui, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Zeeuw, H., Van Veenhuizen, R., & Dubbeling, M. (2011). The role of urban agriculture in building resilient cities in developing countries. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(S1), 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2013). Transdisciplinary sustainability science at higher education institutions: Science policy tools for incremental institutional change. Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(9), 3783–3801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, A. (2010). Vlaamse codex RO—nieuwe decreet plannings-, vergunningen- en handhavingsbeleid. p. 630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, J., & Gleeson, B. (2009). International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 77–83). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, M., Onuki, M., Ikeda, I., & Akiyama, T. (2015). Reconstruction following the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami: Case study of Otsuchi Town in Iwate Prefecture, Japan. Handbook of coastal disaster mitigation for engineers and planners (pp. 615–631). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, R. (2014). Progress in Australian planning history: Traditions, themes and transformations. Progress in Planning, 91, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, H., Frank, L., & Jackson, R. J. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities (p. 368). Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (p. 179). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change (p. 272). Cambridge, UK: Wiley Online, Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedion, S. (1967). Space, time and architecture: the growth of a new tradition (p. 960). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, J. S. (2006). Architecture and psychoanalysis: Peter Eisenman and Jacques Lacan (p. 252). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, S., & Luescher, A. (2007). Collaboration between architects and planners in an urban design studio: Potential for interdisciplinary learning. Journal of Design Research, 6(4), 422–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holston, J. (1989). The modernist city: An anthropological critique of Brasília (p. 383). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E., & Osborn, F. J. (1965). Garden cities of tomorrow (Vol. 23, p. 195). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, & T. E. Bilir, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isendahl, C., & Smith, M. E. (2013). Sustainable agrarian urbanism: The low-density cities of the Mayas and Aztecs. Cities, 31, 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities (Vol. 71, p. 458). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Anderberg, S., Baier, M., & Clark, E., et al. (2011). Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. (2009). China’s water scarcity. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3185–3196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. P., Hole, D. G., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2012). Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2(7), 504–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W. (2011). What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19449–19450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, W, R., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, B. M. (1993). Expanding the American dream: Building and rebuilding Levittown (p. 287). In W. R. Taylor (Ed.). SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larice, M., & Macdonald, E. (2013). The urban design reader (p. 659). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, G. (1997). Land readjustment: A tool for urban development. Habitat International, 21(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838–1846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (Vol. 11, p. 208). MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1984). Good city form (p. 528). MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (1999). Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities? Environment and Planning B, 26, 879–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., & Jacobs, S. (2015). Nature-based solutions for Europe’s sustainable development. Conservation Letters, 1–4 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahlstein, I., Daniel, J. S., & Solomon, S. (2013). Pace of shifts in climate regions increases with global temperature. Nature Climate Change, 3(8), 739–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., & Leemans, R., et al. (2013). Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3–4), 420–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, N. (2010). Why farm the city? Theorizing urban agriculture through a lens of metabolic rift. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(2), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, R. I., Kareiva, P., & Forman, R. T. T. (2008). The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 141(6), 1695–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. L., & Mumford, L. (1969). Design with nature (p. 208). American Museum of Natural History New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R. (2013). Constructing sustainability science: Emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, E. (2009). The new architectural pragmatism: A harvard design magazine reader—William S. Saunders. Journal of Architectural Education, 62(3), 92–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi, M., & Doherty, G. (2010). Ecological urbanism (p. 655). Baden, Switzerland: Lars Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisiplinary field.pdf. Urban Morphology, 1, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., Demuynck, H., & Nussbaumer, J. (2004). Urban renaissance: from physical beautification to social empowerment. City, 8(2), 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (2002). The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928–1960 (p. 375). London, England: Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na, J., Okada, N., & Fang, L. (2009). A collaborative action development approach to improving community disaster reduction using the Yonmenkaigi system. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 30(2), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2006). Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis: An International Journal of Suburban and Metropolitan Studies, 2(1), 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, K., & Kaufman, L. J. (1999). Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning. Agriculture and Human Values, 16, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, J. (1998). Ethics in geography: Giving moral form to the geographical imagination. Area, 30(1), 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseland, M. (1997). Dimensions of the eco-city. Cities, 14(4), 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, M. (1994). Interview with Manuel de Solà-Morales: The capacity for assessment. Archis, 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A. (2000). Land readjustment and metropolitan growth: An examination of suburban land development and urban sprawl in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 53, 217–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A. (2002). The making of urban Japan cities and planning from Edo to the twenty-first century. Nissan Institute/Routledge Japanese studies series (p. 352). London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J. H. (2011). Sustainability science: A review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environmental Conservation, 38(03), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. (2010). The rise of landscape urbanism. Architecture Boston, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, M., Li, X., Xie, H., & Lu, C. (2005). Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China—A case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Land Use Policy, 22(3), 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibaijuka, A. (2009). A cities and climate change initiative, opening statement. In Cities and climate change initiative: Launch and conference report (p. 68). Oslo: UN HABITAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, A., Elrick, C., Kay, R., & Vestergaard, O. (2013). Ecosystem-based adaptation guidance: Moving from principles to practice (p. 1–97), Working Document. United Nations Environmental Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT. (2009). Planning sustainable cities: Global report on human settlements 2009 (Global Rep) (pp. 1–338). UN-Habitat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ryn, S., & Calthorpe, P. (2008). Sustainable communities: a new design synthesis for cities, suburbs and towns (p. 260). Gabriola Island: New Catalyst Books

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 445–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldheim, C. (2006). The landscape urbanism reader (p. 288). Chronicle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2009). “The planned city sweeps the poor away…”: Urban planning and 21st century urbanisation. Progress in Planning, 72(3), 151–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime, M., Trencher, G., Mino, T., Scholz, R. W., Olsson, L., Ness, B., et al. (2012). Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: Towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustainability Science, 7(SUPPL. 1), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokohari, M., & Bolthouse, J. (2011). Planning for the slow lane: The need to restore working greenspaces in maturing contexts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 421–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokohari, M., Takeuchi, K., Watanabe, T., & Yokota, S. (2008). Beyond greenbelts and zoning: A new planning concept for the environment of asian mega-cities. Urban Ecology: An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature, 47, 783–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Ma, W., & Wang, X. (2008). Rapid urbanization and implications for flood risk management in hinterland of the Pearl River Delta, China: The Foshan study. Sensors, 8(4), 2223–2239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Sustainability Science—Global Leadership Initiative, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Giles Bruno Sioen

  2. Department of Urban Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Toru Terada & Makoto Yokohari

Authors
  1. Giles Bruno Sioen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toru Terada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Makoto Yokohari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giles Bruno Sioen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Sustainability Science-Global Leadership Initiative, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

    Miguel Esteban

  2. Graduate Program in Sustainability Science-Global Leadership Initiative, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

    Tomohiro Akiyama

  3. Graduate Program in Sustainability Science-Global Leadership Initiative, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo , Kashiwa, Japan

    Chiahsin Chen

  4. Graduate Program in Sustainability Science-Global Leadership Initiative, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

    Izumi Ikeda

  5. Graduate Program in Sustainability Science-Global Leadership Initiative, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo , Kashiwa, Japan

    Takashi Mino

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sioen, G.B., Terada, T., Yokohari, M. (2016). Sustainability Science as the Next Step in Urban Planning and Design. In: Esteban, M., Akiyama, T., Chen, C., Ikeda, I., Mino, T. (eds) Sustainability Science: Field Methods and Exercises. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32930-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation