Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semantic Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neurosemantics

Part of the book series: Studies in Brain and Mind ((SIBM,volume 10))

  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

Semantics, in the sense used in this book, seeks to understand the meaning of words and sentences, explaining the relations between expressions in a natural language and the world. This chapter intends to give a short account on semantics as has been developed before neurosemantics, and trace the path that naturally lead to its neuro form. The link that, in our view, connects the milestones of semantic theories to neurosemantics, is the aim of constructing precise mathematical models of the relations between linguistic entities and their referents. Therefore, much attention will be given to the transition from a descriptive semantics to its mathematical foundation in modern logic. It will be argued that the unsatisfactory aspect of this project was to have neglected the mind, which became on the contrary, the main object of investigation during the cognitive turn. We will describe the vicissitudes of cognitive semantics, its merits, and the counterside of a serious weakness in the level and robustness of its mathematical modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, G., & Hacker, P. (1989). Frege’s anti-psychologism. In M. A. Notturno (Ed.), Perspectives on psychologism (pp. 75–137). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biro, J. I., & Kotatko, P. (Eds.). (1995). Frege, sense and reference one hundred years later. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G. (1854b),An investigation of the laws of thought, on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. London: Walton and Maberley (trad. it. di Mario Trinchero Indagine sulle leggi del pensiero, cui sono fondate le teorie matematiche della logica e della probabilita‘, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, R. P. (1999). On chomsky’s “fable” of instantaneous language evolution. Language & Communication, 19, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M., & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brdar, M., Gries, S., & Fuchs, M. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive linguistics – Convergence and expansion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1928). Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin-Schlactensee: Weltkreis Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of languages. IRE Transaction on Information Theory, 2, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1958). On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control, 1, 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge: The managua lectures. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist progam for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain bromberger. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax – An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. A. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of language. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness a connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Louis Nebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: W. Koebner. (Reprinted by Olms, Hildesheim, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50 (Reprinted in Angelelli, I. (Ed.) (1967). Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim: Olms).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1894). Rezension von: E. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik iI. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 103, 313–332. (Reprinted in Angelelli, I. (Ed.) (1967). Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim: Olms).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1904). Was ist eine Funktion? In S. Meyer (Ed.), Festschrift für Ludwig Boltzmann gewidmet zum sechzigsten Geburtstage (pp. 656–666). Leipzig: A. Barth. (Reprinted in Angelelli, I. (Ed.) (1967). Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim: Olms; Trad. it. di M. Carapezza e G. Rigamonti in Poggi, S. (Ed.) (2002). Le leggi del pensiero tra logica, ontologia e psicologia. Il dibattito austro-tedesco (1830–1930). Milano: Edizioni Unicopli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D. (Ed.). (2006). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg A (2006) Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J. (1985). A principled exception to the coordinate structure constraint. In Papers from the Twenty-First Regional Meeting, Part I. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. A. (1993). The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z. S. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London, trad. it. di G. Nicheli, La Nuova Italia, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). A quantitative description of ion currents and its applications to conduction and excitation in nerve membranes. Journal of Physiology, 117, 500–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1981). Language and other abstract objects. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Postal, P. (1991). Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 515–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. (1956). Representation of events in nerve nets and finite automata. Automata Studies, 34, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A. (1972). Naming and necessity. In D. Davidson & G. H. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 253–355). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language: An elementary exposition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1986). A principled exception to the coordinate structure constraint. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1684). Abhdlg. ohne Überschrift Vorarb. z. allg. Charakteristik. Berlin, in Die philosophischen Schriften a cura di C. I. Gerhardt, 1875–1863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettvin, J., Maturana, H., McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1959). What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of IRE, 47, 1940–1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1999). The emergence of language (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconi, D. (1997). Lexical competence. Cambridge: MIT. (ediz. it. Competenza Lessicale, Laterza, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconi, D. (2000). What is montague semantics? In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2007). The ontology of concepts – abstract objects or or mental representations? Nous, 41, 561–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. L. (1954). Neural nets and the brain-model problem. PhD thesis, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (1992). Sense and justification. Mind, 101, 793–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinini, G. (2004). The first computational theory of mind and brain: A close look at McCulloch and Pitts’s ‘Logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity’. Synthese, 141, 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, W., & McCulloch, W. (1947). How we know universals: The perception of auditory and visual forms. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 9, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plebe, A. (2004). Il linguaggio come calcolo – dalla logica di Boole alle reti neuronali. Roma: SCIENTIA, Armando Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. (1921). Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions. Journal of Mathematics, 43, 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. (1947). Recursive unsolvability of a problem of Thue. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prat, C. S., Keller, T. A., & Just, M. A. (2007). Individual differences in sentence comprehension: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1950–1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proverbio, A. M., Crotti, N., Zani, A., & Adorni, R. (2009). The role of left and right hemispheres in the comprehension of idiomatic language: An electrical neuroimaging study. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: Discrete combinatorial mechanisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain and Language, 112, 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of “meaning”. In H. Putnam, Mind, language and reality (Vol. 2, pp. 215–271). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. (1938). Mathematical biophysics: Physico-mathematical foundations of biology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1902). Letter to Frege. In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967), From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic 1879–1931. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1918). Mysticism and logic and other essays. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, P. (2004a). Chomsky’s minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. P., & Ravenscroft, I. (1994). What is folk psychology? Cognition, 50, 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L. A., Haverkort, M., & Zwarts, F. (2004). Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua, 115, 997–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thue, A. (1906). Über unendliche Zeichenreihen. Norske Vid Selsk Skr I Mat Nat Kl, 7, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thue, A. (1912). Über die gegnseitige Lage gleiche Teile gewisser Zeichenreihen. Norske Vid Selsk Skr I Mat Nat Kl, 10, 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42, 230–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, cognition and the experiential basis of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., & ter Meulen, A. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of logic and language. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo, N. (2000). Psychologism in logic: Some similarities between boole and frege. In J. Gasser (Ed.), A Boole anthology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Violi, P. (2001). Meaning and experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1958). The computer and the brain. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922b). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Trench, Trubner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchung. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Science, University of Messina, Catania, Italy

    Alessio Plebe

  2. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Vivian M. De La Cruz

Authors
  1. Alessio Plebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivian M. De La Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plebe, A., De La Cruz, V.M. (2016). Semantic Theories. In: Neurosemantics. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28552-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation