Skip to main content

On the Safety of Filamentous Fungi with Special Emphasis on Trichoderma reesei and Products Made by Recombinant Means

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gene Expression Systems in Fungi: Advancements and Applications

Part of the book series: Fungal Biology ((FUNGBIO))

Abstract

Filamentous fungi are routinely used in industry to produce a variety of recombinant gene products, in particular enzymes. Because of the recombinant nature of the production, safety assessment requires information across the entire process including the safety of the intended production host, introduced DNA sequences, natural host (gene donor) and the recombinant product made. While the safety regulations, as a whole, follow the same principles, there are slight differences between different countries. The main regulatory bodies worldwide include Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US, and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The key in evaluating safety of a product is the assessment of the production strain. Here we will use the industrially-exploited enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei as an example in establishing the safety of filamentous fungi and their products. The questions and guidelines regarding the acceptance of T. reesei and its products for human use are similarly applicable to other fungi. Regulations and practices in the European Union (EU), United States of America (USA) and Australia are presented as examples typical of developed nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrio J-L, Demain AL. Recombinant organisms for production of industrial products. Bioeng Bugs. 2010;1(2):116–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian–microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1975;31(6):347–64. doi:10.1016/0165-1161(75)90046-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Manufacturers and Formulators of Enzyme Products. Indicative List of enzymes commercialised by members of Amfep (updated 2014 Apr 11). http://www.amfep.org/content/list-enzymes. Accessed 24 June 2014.

  • Association of Manufacturers of Fermentation Enzyme Products. Working group on consumer allergy risk from enzyme residues in food. Copenhagen, August 1998. http://amfep.drupalgardens.com/sites/amfep.drupalgardens.com/files/consumer-allergy.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2014.

  • Australian Government ComLaw. Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Standard 1.3.3—Processing Aids (modified 05 Jun 2014). http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2014C00795. Accessed 14 July 2014.

  • Australian Government ComLaw. Gene technology regulations 2001 (modified 01 Sep 2011). http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011C00732/Html/Text#_Toc302474513. Accessed 14 July 2014.

  • Bailey MJ, Nevalainen KMH. Induction, isolation and testing of stable Trichoderma reesei mutants with improved production of solubilizing cellulase. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1981;3(2):153–7. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(81)90076-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BCC Research. Global markets for enzymes in industrial applications (June 2014). http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/enzymes-industrial-applications-bio030h.html. Accessed 14 July 2014.

  • Beja da Costa M, van Uden N. Use of 2-deoxyglucose in the selective isolation of mutants of Trichoderma reesei with enhanced ß-glucosidase production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1980;22(11):2429–32. doi:10.1002/bit.260221121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdichon F, Casaregola S, Farrokh C, Frisvad JC, Gerds ML, Hammes WP, et al. Food fermentations: microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;154(3):87–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner H, Graf H. Paracelsin, a peptide antibiotic containing alpha-aminoisobutyric acid, isolated from Trichoderma reesei Simmons. Part A Experientia. 1983;39(5):528–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Biosafety. Updated 8 Nov 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety. Accessed 1 July 2014.

  • Commission Regulation (EU) No 234/2011 of 10 March 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings. Off J Eur Union L 64. 2011;54:15–24. doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.064.eng.

  • De Miguel D, Gómez P, González R, García-Suárez J, Cuadros JA, Bañas MH, et al. Nonfatal pulmonary Trichoderma viride infection in an adult patient with acute myeloid leukemia: report of one case and review of the literature. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;53(1):33–7. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Off J Eur Union L 106. 2001;44:1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2004/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the harmonisation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of the principles of good laboratory practice and the verification of their applications for tests on chemical substances. Off J Eur Union L 50. 2004;47:44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms. Off J Eur Union L 125. 2009;53:75–97. doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.125.eng.

  • Druzhinina IS, KomoÅ„-Zelazowska M, Kredics L, Hatvani L, Antal Z, Belayneh T, et al. Alternative reproductive strategies of Hypocrea orientalis and genetically close but clonal Trichoderma longibrachiatum, both capable of causing invasive mycoses of humans. Microbiology. 2008;154(Pt 11):3447–59. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2008/021196-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durand H, Clanet M, Tiraby G. A genetic approach of the improvement of cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. In: Egneus H, Ellegard A, editors. Proceedings of bioenergy world conference, vol. 3. London: Elsevier Applied Sciences; 1984. p. 246–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards). Scientific opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2013 update). EFSA J. 2013;11(11):3449. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3449.

  • Eligibility for Classification as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). 21 CFR 170.30. US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USA. 2012 Apr 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • FarkaÅ¡ V, Labudová I, Bauer S, Ferenczy L. Preparation of mutants of Trichoderma viride with increased production of cellulase. Folia Microbiol. 1981;26(2):129–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana G. Genetically modified micro-organisms: the EU regulatory framework and the new Directive 2009/41/EC on the contained use. Chem Eng Trans. 2010;20:1–6. doi:10.3303/CET1020001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Standards Australia New Zealand. GM Foods—Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Foods (Jun 2005). http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/publications/Pages/GMFoodsSafety-Assessment-of-Genetically-Modified-Foods.aspx. Accessed 14 July 2014.

  • Gallo BJ, Andreotti R, Roche C, Ryu D, Mandels M. Cellulase production by a new mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei MCG 77. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1978;8:89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor P, How US. FDA’s GRAS notification program works. Food Saf Mag. 2006;11:16–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • GENENCOR Inc. 2014. www.genecor.com. Accessed 1 July 2014.

  • General Specifications and Considerations for Enzyme Preparations Used in Food Processing. In: Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Combined Compendium of Food Additive Specifications, vol. 4: Analytical methods, test procedures and laboratory solutions used by and referenced in the food additive specifications. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome, 2006. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0691e/a0691e.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2014.

  • Hartl L, Seiboth B. Sequential gene deletions in Hypocrea jecorina using a single blaster cassette. Curr Genet. 2005;48(3):204–11. doi:10.1007/s00294-005-0011-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatvani L, Vágvölgyi C, Kredics L, Druzhinina I. DNA barcode for species identification in Trichoderma. In: Gupta VK, Schmoll M, Herrera-Estrella A, Upadhyay RS, Druzhinina I, Tuohy MG, editors. Biotechnology and biology of Trichoderma. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. p. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • International subcommission on Trichoderma and Hypocrea taxonomy. 2012. http://www.isth.info. Accessed 1 July 2014.

  • Kawamori M, Morikawa Y, Shinsa Y, Takayama K, Takasawa S. Preparation of mutants resistant to catabolite repression of Trichoderma reesei. Agric Biol Chem. 1985;49(10):2875–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamori M, Ado Y, Takasawa S. Preparation and application of Trichoderma reesei mutants with enhanced ß-glucosidase. Agric Biol Chem. 1986;50(10):2477–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen CD. Casarett & Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivikko A, Viander M, Lanner A. Use of the extended Phadebas RAST panel in the diagnosis of mould allergy in asthmatic children. Allergy. 1991;46(2):85–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kredics L, Antal Z, Doczi I, Manczinger L, Kevei F, Nagy E. Clinical importance of the genus Trichoderma. A review. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2003;50(2):105–17. doi:10.1556/AMicr.50.2003.2-3.1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Crom S, Schackwitz W, Pennacchio L, Magnuson JK, Culley DE, Collett JR, et al. Tracking the roots of cellulase hyperproduction by the fungus Trichoderma reesei using massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(38):16151–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905848106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Yang X, Yang S, Zhu M, Wang X. Technology prospecting on enzymes: application, marketing and engineering. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2012;2(3), e201209017. doi:10.5936/csbj.201209017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickfeldt E, Kuhls K, Muthumeenakshi S. Molecular taxonomy of Trichoderma and Gliocladium and their teleomorphs. In: Kubicek CP, Harman GE, editors. Trichoderma and Gliocladium, vol. 1: Basic biology, taxonomy and genetics. London: Taylor & Francis; 1998. p. 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson B, Munro I, Abbot P, Baldwin N, Lopez-Garcia R, Ly K, et al. Review of the regulation and safety assessment of food substances in various countries and jurisdictions. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2013;30(7):1147–220. doi:10.1080/19440049.2013.795293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandels M, Reese ET. Induction of cellulase in Trichoderma viride as influenced by carbon sources and metals. J Bacteriol. 1957;73:269–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandels M, Weber J, Parizek R. Enhanced cellulase production by a mutant of Trichoderma viride. Appl Microbiol. 1971;21(1):152–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margeot A, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Edlund M, Slade R, Monot F. New improvements for lignocellulosic ethanol. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(3):372–80. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markov AV, Gusakov AV, Kondratyeva EG, Okunev ON, Bekkarevich AO, Sinitsyn AP. New effective method for analysis of the component composition of enzyme complexes from Trichoderma reesei. Biochemistry. 2005;70(6):657–63. doi:10.1007/s10541-005-0166-4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):553–60. doi:10.1038/nbt1403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Microbial commercial activities notification requirements. 40 CFR 725 (d). US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USA. 2011 July 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Microorganisms; general exemptions from reporting requirements; revisions to recipient organisms eligible for tier I and tier ii exemptions; proposed rule. 77 Federal Register 172 (September 5, 2012). US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USA; 2012. p. 54499–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Gopalkrishnan KS, Ghose TK. A constitutively cellulase-producing mutant of Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24(1):251–4. doi:10.1002/bit.260240122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE. Semiquantitative plate assay for determination of cellulase production by Trichoderma viride. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977a;33(1):178–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE. Preparation of mutants of Trichoderma reesei with enhanced cellulase production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977b;34(6):777–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE. Selective screening methods for the isolation of high yielding cellulase mutants of Trichoderma reesei. In: Brown RD, Jurasek L, editors. Hydrolysis of cellulose: mechanisms of enzymatic and acid catalysis. Advances in Chemistry Series, vol. 181. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1979. p. 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee P, Horwitz B, Kenerley M. Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma—a genomic perspective. Microbiology. 2012;158(Pt 1):35–45. doi:10.1099/mic.0.053629-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen KMH, Palva ET, Bailey MJ. A high cellulase-producing mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1980;2(1):59–60. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(80)90009-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen H, Suominen P, Taimisto K. On the safety of Trichoderma reesei. J Biotechnol. 1994;37(3):193–200. doi:10.1016/0168-1656(94)90126-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen KM, Te'o VS, Bergquist PL. Heterologous protein expression in filamentous fungi. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23(9):468–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Enzyme Nomenclature (updated 24 Jun 2014). http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/. Accessed 2 July 2014.

  • Novozymes Fact Sheet. 2013. http://www.novozymes.com/en/about-us/brochures/Documents/TodaysFacts-2013.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2014.

  • OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Section 4: Health effects: No. 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 420, 471 and 473. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-4-health-effects_20745788. doi: 10.1787/20745788. Accessed 24 June 2014.

  • Office of the Gene Technology Regulator. Handbook on the regulation of gene technology in Australia: a user’s guide to the gene technology act 2000 and related legislation. 2001. http://www.ogtr.gov.au. Accessed 8 July 2014.

  • Olempska-Beer ZS, Merker RI, Ditto MD, DiNovi MJ. Food-processing enzymes from recombinant microorganisms—a review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;45(2):144–58. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.05.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pariza MW, Johnson EA. Evaluating the safety of microbial enzyme preparations used in food processing: update for a new century. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001;33(2):173–86. doi:10.1006/rtph.2001.1466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen S, Putus T, Reiman M. IgE antibodies against environmental molds, yeast and bacteria in an adult population (Poster). 2nd Int Symp Molecular Allergol, Rome, Italy. 2007 Apr 22-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitions. 21 CFR 171.1. US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USA. 2013 Apr 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Off J Eur Union L 353. 2008;51:1–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings. Off J Eur Union L 354. 2008;51:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food enzymes and amending Council Directive 83/417/EEC, Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999, Directive 2000/13/EC, Council Directive 2001/112/EC and Regulation (EC) No 258/97. Off J Eur Union L 354. 2008;51:7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Off J Eur Union L 268. 2003;46:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Díez B. Strategies for the transformation of filamentous fungi. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(2):189–95. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01516.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulis AM, Levitt JA. FDA’s food ingredient approval process: safety assurance based on scientific assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009;53(1):20–31. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safety evaluation of technical enzyme products with regards to the REACH legislation. 2009. http://www.enzymes-reach.org/sites/g/files/g1346131/f/201310/Safety-evaluation-of-technical-enzyme-products-with-regard-to-REACH.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2014.

  • Schuster A, Schmoll M. Biology and biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87(3):787–99. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2632-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl V, Seiboth B. Trichoderma reesei: genetic approaches to improving strain efficiency. Biogeosciences. 2010;1(2):343–54. doi:10.4155/bfs.10.1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl V, Gamauf C, Druzhinina IS, Seiboth B, Hartl L, Kubicek CP. The Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) hypercellulolytic mutant RUT C30 lacks a 85 kb (29 gene-encoding) region of the wild-type genome. BMC Genomics. 2008;9(1):327. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl V, Seibel C, Kubicek CP, Schmoll M. Sexual development in the industrial workhorse Trichoderma reesei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(33):13909–14. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904936106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker SP, Raymond JC, Bruner R. Diversity amongst improved Trichoderma strains. In: Hollaender AE, editor. Trends in the biology of fermentations for fuels and chemicals. New York: Plenum; 1981. p. 89–109.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons EG. Classification of some cellulase-producing Trichoderma species. In: Bigelow HE, Simmons EG, editors. Second international mycological congress: abstracts; 1977 Aug 27–Sep 3; University of South Florida, Tampa. Hamilton/Newell; 1977. p. 618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spök A. Safety regulations of food enzymes. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2006;44(2):197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger MG, Vitikainen M, Uskonen P, Brunner K, Adam G, Pakula T, et al. Transformation system for Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) that favors homologous integration and employs reusable bidirectionally selectable markers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(1):114–21. doi:10.1128/AEM.02100-10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake WE. Cloning and analysis of fungal genes. In: Bennett JW, Lasure LL, editors. More gene manipulations in fungi. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic; 1991. p. 51–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trichoderma reesei; Proposed Significant New Use Rule; Proposed Rule. 77 Federal Register 114 (June 13, 2012). US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USA; 2012. p. 35331–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biotechnology Program under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). TSCA Biotechnology Notifications, FY 1998 to Present (updated 29 May 2014). http://www.epa.gov/biotech_rule/pubs/submiss.htm. Accessed 24 June 2014.

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (updated 12 May 2011). http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/legislation/federalfooddrugandcosmeticactFDCAct/default.htm. Accessed 2 July 2014.

  • Vesper SJ, McKinstry C, Yang C, Haugland RA, Kercsmar CM, Yike I, et al. Specific molds associated with asthma in water-damaged homes. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(8):852–8. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000224736.52780.2f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Nevalainen Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gryshyna, A., Kautto, L., Peterson, R., Nevalainen, H. (2016). On the Safety of Filamentous Fungi with Special Emphasis on Trichoderma reesei and Products Made by Recombinant Means. In: Schmoll, M., Dattenböck, C. (eds) Gene Expression Systems in Fungi: Advancements and Applications. Fungal Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27951-0_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics