Abstract
The “lying” H-shaped with double contour plication to muscle aponeurosis decreases longitudinal and transverse diameters of the anterior abdominal wall. Rather than the median xiphoid-pubic fusiform plication, the H-shaped plication recovers the waist and reinforces the epigastrium and hypogastrium, reducing the possibility of recurrent projection at these areas. The “lying” H-shaped with double contour plication strengthens the entire abdominal muscle aponeurosis system, creating an adequate support to restrain the intra-abdominal pressure. Increase of the intrapulmonary pressure happens at the end of plication. It decreases in level at the end of the surgery, but remains from 15 to 20 % higher in relation to the intrapulmonary pressure setting prior to the plication. No further respiratory distress is reported by the patients a day after the surgery or late postoperative period. The vertical branch centered in the abdominal midline makes possible to centralize the umbilicus in the midline of the abdomen. The approach of the lines of the vertical branch mobilizes the umbilicus transversally, repairing its lateral displacement, by attaching it at the abdominal midline. Closure of the horizontal branches enables to shorten the longitudinal length of the anterior abdominal aponeurosis. The degree of shortening of the anterior abdominal aponeurosis can arrive up to 6 cm long, depending on the width of the horizontal branch ellipses. The double contour of the transverse plication also allows the umbilicus mobilization taking it to an appropriate position in the abdominal wall. It also reduces the distance of the xiphoid-pubis allowing lowering and fixation of the cutaneous flap without tension, with better accommodation of the cutaneous flap. Even though a wide dissection of the skin flap at the epigastrium is needed to perform the “lying” H-shaped with double contour plication, the aforementioned complications did not occur. This happens due to the longitudinal shortening of the muscle aponeurosis system which facilitates the down displacement and easy accommodation of the skin flap toward the pubis, where it is fixed without tension. Absence of tension at suprapubic area avoids pubis elevation, suture dehiscence, and skin necrosis after the skin closure. In addition, a wide dissection of the skin flap in the upper abdomen is necessary to avoid the formation of a skin bulge along the edge of the plication, particularly if the plication is very large. Long-term maintenance has been achieved with the “lying” H-shaped with double contour plication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abramo AC, Viola JC, Marques A (1990) The H approach to abdominal muscle aponeurosis for the improvement of body contour. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(5):1008–1013
Abramo AC, Viola JC, Marquez A, Jung KS (1998) Abdominoplasty: a transversal and longitudinal pleating to muscle aponeurosis. Word Plast 2(1):52–58
Abramo AC, Casas SG, Oliveira VR, Marquez A (1999) H-shaped double contour plication in abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23:260–26
Avelar JM (1999) A new technique for abdominoplasty-closed vascular system of subdermal flap folder over itself combined with liposuction. Rev Bras Cir 89:3–20
Heller JB, Teng E, Knoll BI, Persing J (2008) Outcome analysis of combined lipoabdominoplasty versus conventional abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1821–1829
Hinderer UT (1975) The dermolipectomy approach for augmentation mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2:359–369
Marquez A, Brenda E, Pereira MD, de Castro M, Abramo AC (1996) Abdominoplasty with two fusiform plication. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:249–251
Matos WN Jr, Ribeiro RC, Marujo RA, da Rocha RP, da Silva Ribeiro SM, Carrillo Jiminez FV (2003) Classification for indications of lipoabdominoplasty and its variations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27(4):322–327
Rodiguez-Feliz JR, Makhijani S, Przybyla A, Hill D, Chao J (2012) Intraoperative assessment of the umbilicus distance: a reliable anatomic landmark for transposition of the umbilicus. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:8–17
Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brow SA, Gibby DL (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:259–263
Verissimo P, Nahas FX, Barbosa MVJ, Gomes HFC, Ferreira LM (2014) Is it possible to repair diastasis recti and shorten the aponeurosis at same time? Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:379–386
Villegas FJ (2014) A novel approach to abdominoplasty: TULUA modifications (transverse plication, no undermining, full liposuction, neoUmbilicoplasty, and lower transverse abdominal scar). Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:511–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abramo, A.C. (2016). The “Lying” H-Shaped with Double Contour Plication of the Anterior Aponeurosis Wall in Abdominoplasty. In: Avelar, J. (eds) New Concepts on Abdominoplasty and Further Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27851-3_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27851-3_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27849-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27851-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)