Skip to main content

Design, Optimization, Testing, Verification, and Validation of the Wingtip Active Trailing Edge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU)

Abstract

Within the scope of the SARISTU project (smart intelligent aircraft structures), a wingtip active trailing edge (WATE) is developed. Winglets are intended to improve the aircraft’s efficiency aerodynamically, but simultaneously they introduce important loads into the main wing structure. These additional loads lead to heavier wing structure and can thus diminish the initial benefit. Preliminary investigations have shown that a wingtip active trailing edge can significantly reduce these loads at critical flight points (active load alleviation). Additionally, it can provide adapted winglet geometry in off-design flight conditions to further improve aerodynamic efficiency. The idea of the active winglet has been successfully treated in several theoretical studies and small-scale experiments. However, there is a big step towards bringing this concept to a real flight application. In this project, a full-scale outer wing and winglet are currently being manufactured and will be tested, both structurally and at low speed in a wind tunnel. The scope for eventual EASA CS25 certification of a civil transport aircraft with such a winglet control device will then be assessed. In particular, a load alleviation system requires a minimum operational reliability to take effect on the applicable flight load envelope for structural design. Therefore, the potential failure modes are assessed, and a fault tree analysis is performed to draw key requirements for the system architecture design. In order to assess the overall system benefit, manufacturing, operation, and maintenance requirements are taken into account. The confined space inside the winglet loft-line presents a significant challenge for integration of an active control system. It is shown how small changes to the aerodynamic surface have both reduced the aerodynamic hinge moments (leading to lighter actuators) and created additional internal space for systems, whilst maintaining an equivalent overall drag level. The potential for reducing wing and winglet loads with a winglet control device is assessed. The kinematic design challenge of delivering the necessary power in a confined space is described. Actuation is accomplished by a single electromechanical actuator which is housed inside the CFRP winglet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACE:

Actuator control electronics

AS:

Assumption

CAD:

Computer-aided design

CFRP:

Carbon fibre reinforced polymer

CG:

Centre of gravity

CMM:

Coordinate measurement machine

CNC:

Computerized numerical control

DAL:

Development assurance level

DAQ:

Data acquisition

EMA:

Electromechanical actuator

FC:

Failure condition

FEA:

Finite element analysis

FEM:

Finite element model

FHA:

Failure hazard assessment

FTA:

Fault tree analysis

GLAS:

Gust load alleviation system

GST:

Ground static testing

GVT:

Ground vibration testing

IS:

Integration scenario

LCM:

Liquid composite moulding

L/D:

Lift to drag (ratio)

MARI:

Membrane-assisted resin infusion

MCU:

Motor control unit

MIF:

Multivariate mode indicator

NDI:

Non-destructive inspection

OOA:

Out of autoclave

P :

Probability of occurrence of failure

PSSA:

Preliminary system safety analysis

Q :

Probability of being in failure state

RQ:

Requirement

RSDP:

Reference structure design principle

RTM:

Resin transfer moulding

WATE:

Wingtip active trailing edge

WT:

Wind tunnel

References

  1. Bourdin P, Gatto A, Friswell M (2006) The application of variable cant angle winglets for morphing aircraft control. In: 24th applied aerodynamics conference, University of Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ursache N et al (2007) Morphing winglets for aircraft multi-phase improvement. In: 7th AIAA aviation technology, integration and operations conference, Bristol University

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sankrithi M, Frommer J (2010) Controllable winglets. US Patent 7,744,038 B2, The Boeing Company, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen A, Breitsamter C (2006) Investigation on active winglet influencing the wake of a large transport aircraft. In: 25th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, Institute of Aerodynamics, Technische Universität München

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breitsamter C, Allen A Aerodynamic body and carrier wing comprising an aerodynamic body, actuating drive control module, computer, computer program and method for influencing post-turbulence. US Patent 2010/0006706 A1, Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kauertz S, Neuwert G (2006) Excitation of instabilities in the wake of an airfoil with winglets. In: 24th applied aerodynamics conference, RWTH Aachen, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Park P, Rokhsaz K (2003) Effects of a winglet rudder on lift-to-drag ratio and wake vortex frequency. In 21st applied aerodynamics conference, Department of Aerospace Engineering Wichita State University

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagel B, Kintscher M, Streit T (2008) Active and passive structural measures for aeroelastic winglet design. In: 26th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, DLR

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guida N (2011) Active winglet. US Patent 7,900,877 B1, Tamarack Aerospace Group, Inc., March 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. Irving J, Davies R (2007) Wing tip device. European Patent 1531126 (A1), Airbus UK Ltd, Sep 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wildschek A, Maier R (2010) Winglet with autonomously actuated tab. European Patent 2233395 (A1), Sep 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buxel C, Dafnis A et al (2011) Design and qualification of a winglet with a high speed oscillating active control surface for aeroelastic wind tunnel experiments under cryogenic conditions. In: Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress. RWTH Aachen, Institute of Aerospace and Lightweight Structures

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dafnis A et al (2010) Stationäre und instationäre Untersuchungen an einem elastischen Flügelmodell mit Winglet im kryogenen Windkanal im Rahmen des ASDMAD-Projektes, Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2010, RWTH Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heinen C, Wildschek A, Herring M (2013) Design of a Winglet Control Device for Active Load Alleviation. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Bristol, UK, 24–26 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. EASA CS-25 Amendment 14, dated 19 Dec 2013—“Certification Specification for Large Aeroplanes”

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heinen C (2012) Design of a winglet control device for active load alleviation. Diploma thesis, Institute of Lightweight Structures, Technische Universität München, Nov 2012

    Google Scholar 

  17. Storm S, Wildschek A (2014) Curved wing profile with a pivotable flap. European Patent 2743177 (A1), June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  18. ARP4754 The aerospace recommended practice—guidelines for development of civil aircraft, SAE International, Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett J (2010) Fault tolerant electromechanical actuators for aircraft. Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University, School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  20. Belschner T (2011) System design and preliminary system safety analysis of a blended wing body aircraft. Diploma thesis, Uni Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jeanneau M, Aversa N, Delannoy S, Hockenhull M (2004) Awiator’s study of a wing load control: design and flight-test results. In: 16th IFAC symposium on automatic control in aerospace, St. Petersburg (RUSSIA), 14–18. June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston J et al (1979) Accelerated development and flight evaluation of active controls concepts for subsonic transport aircraft volume 1 load alleviation/extended span development and flight test. NASA CR-159097, pp 2–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wildschek A (2008) An adaptive feed-forward controller for active wing bending vibration alleviation on large transport aircraft. Ph.D. dissertation, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wildschek A, Maier R, Hoffmann F, Jeanneau M, Aversa N (2009) Minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft. US patent US 2009/0084908, April 2009

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elliott S (2001) Signal processing for active control. Academic Press, London, pp 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wildschek A, Maier R, Hahn K-U, Leißling D, Preß M, Zach A (2009) Flight test with an adaptive feed-forward controller for alleviation of turbulence excited wing bending vibrations. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Chicago, IL, 10–13 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hecker S, Hahn K-U (2007) Advanced gust load alleviation system for large flexible aircraft. In: 1st CEAS European air & space conference, Berlin, Germany, 10–13 Sept 2007

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wildschek A, Bartosiewicz Z, Mozyrska D (2014) A multi-input multi-output adaptive feed-forward controller for vibration alleviation on a large blended wing body airliner. J Sound Vibr

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koch O, Schneiderbauer G (2012) Method for producing a fibre composite component, and a tool arrangement for same. Patent CA 2827545 A1, Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has gratefully received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under Grant Agreement no 284562. Many thanks also go to all SARISTU partners for their invaluable contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Wildschek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wildschek, A., Storm, S., Herring, M., Drezga, D., Korian, V., Roock, O. (2016). Design, Optimization, Testing, Verification, and Validation of the Wingtip Active Trailing Edge. In: Wölcken, P., Papadopoulos, M. (eds) Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22413-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22413-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22412-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22413-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics