Abstract
This chapter sheds light on the European Union’s (EU) latest strategies, guidelines and principles for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), corporate governance and sustainability reporting. It reports on several EU governments’ regulatory roles as their societal governance is based on interdependent relationships with stakeholders. As a matter of fact, there are some of the EU countries who have already introduced intelligent substantive and reflexive regulations for their environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. Of course, there are different actors and drivers who are shaping CSR communications and policies in relational frameworks with the civil society and corporate businesses. This chapter reports on national CSR policies that are related to the disclosures of non-financial performance of organizations. It transpires that very often, governments, NGOs and corporate businesses resort to non-governmental organizations’ regulatory instruments such as process and performance-oriented tools that help them to structure their ESG reports. These instruments usually focus on issues such as labour standards, human rights, health and safety, environmental protection, corporate governance and the like. Therefore, this contribution makes reference to some of the most relevant EU recommendations for the disclosure of integrated reporting. It posits that the way forward is to have more proactive EU governments that raise the profile of CSR. This chapter indicates that any compulsory reinforcement of the regulatory measures may possibly result in efficiencies and operational cost savings for businesses, in the long term. In this light, more effective communication and dialogue between stakeholder groups will help to raise awareness of the public policy case as well as the business case for CSR. Notwithstanding, it is in the businesses’ self-interest to anticipate regulatory pressures for ESG initiatives. Ultimately, when businesses implement corporate sustainability and responsibility they forge fruitful relationships with key stakeholders, including the regulatory ones. In doing so, they will also address societal, environmental, governance and economic deficits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
ASB. (2006). Reporting statement: Operating and financial review. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/ASB/Reporting-Statement-Operating-and-Financial-Review-File.pdf. Accessed August 30th, 2014.
Bansal, P., Jiang, G. F., & Jung, J. C. (2014). Managing responsibly in tough economic times: Strategic and tactical CSR during the 2008–2009 global recession. Long Range Planning, 48(2), 69–79.
BSR. (2012). Trends in ESG integration in investments. https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Trends_in_ESG_Integration.pdf. Accessed on September 20, 2014.
Camilleri, M. A. (2012). A review of regulatory instruments and guidelines in social and environmental behaviour. Working paper at Nyenrode Business Universiteit, Netherlands in an EABIS 2012 colloquium, entitled; Valuing non-financial performance.
Camilleri, M. A. (2014). Advancing the sustainable tourism agenda through strategic CSR perspectives. Tourism Planning & Development, 11(1), 42–56.
Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Valuing stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. Corporate Reputation Review, 18, 2.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
CCA. (2008). Climate change act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents. Accessed October 2, 2014.
Clark, G. L., & Knight, E. R. (2008). Implications of the UK companies act 2006 for institutional investors and the market for corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Law, 11, 259.
CSR Compass. (2014). Responsible supply chain management. http://www.csrcompass.com/responsible-supply-chain-management Accessed September 23, 2014.
Danish National Action Plan. (2014). Implementation of the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Danish Business Authority, Copenhagen. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/NationalPlans/Denmark_NationalPlanBHR.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2014.
DCCA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and reporting in Denmark. Danish Commerce and Companies Agency. http://samfundsansvar.dk/file/319099/corporate_social_responsibility_and_reporting_in_denmark_september_2010.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2014.
DCGC. (2014). Dutch corporate governance code: Principles of good corporate governance and best practice provisions. http://commissiecorporategovernance.nl/download/?id=606. Accessed on October 2, 2014.
DECC. (2014). UK national energy efficiency action plan. Department of energy and climate change. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/eed/doc/neep/2014_neeap_united-kingdom.pdf Accessed August 29, 2014.
EU. (2002). Corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development. COM(2002) 347 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
EU. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/_getdocument.cfm?doc_id=701. Accessed February 3, 2013.
EU. (2012). Sustainable and responsible business European Expert Group on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and SMEs. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/sme/european-expert-group/index_en.htm. Accessed July 12, 2014.
EU. (2014a). Sustainable development. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/ Accessed June 14, 2014.
EU. (2014b). Non-financial reporting. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/non-financial_reporting/index_en.htm. Accessed June 25, 2014.
EU. (2014c). European pollutant release and transfer register (PRTR). http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/general_provisions/l28149_en.htm. Accessed August 29, 2014.
Eurofound. (2003). Towards a sustainable corporate social responsibility. European Foundation for the improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
FRC. (2012). The UK corporate governance code. Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-September-2012.aspx. Accessed October 3, 2014.
Hąbek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2013). European union regulatory requirements relating to sustainability reporting: The case of Sweden. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademia Morska w Szczecinie.
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School research working paper 11–100.
Ireland’s Credit Institutions Act. (2008). http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2008/en/act/pub/0018/. Accessed September 19, 2014.
Kessler, A., & Cuerpo, C. (2011). Macroeconomic impact of the sustainable economy law. Documentos de Trabajo, 03.
Knopf, J., Kahlenborn, W., Hajduk, T., Weiss, D., Feil, M., Fiedler, R., et al. (2010). Corporate social responsibility national public policies in the European union. Brussels: EU Commission.
Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745.
Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132–135.
KPMG. (2010). Carrots and sticks - Promoting transparency and sustainability. An update on trends in voluntary and mandatory approaches to sustainability reporting. KPMG in collaboration with United Nations Environment Programme and Global Reporting Initiative in Africa. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Carrots-And-Sticks-Promoting-Transparency-And-Sustainbability.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2014.
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 11–22.
Mullerat, R. (2013, June). Corporate social responsibility: A European perspective (Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman paper series, Vol. 13, No. 6).
Nidasio, C. (2004). Implementing CSR on a large scale: The role of government. In 3rd annual colloquium of the European academy of business in society, Ghent.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 1–2.
Rasche, A. (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards – the case of the UN global compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(4), 192–205.
Transparency International. (2012). GRI: Germany’s corporate reports do not deliver what they promise. https://blog.transparency.org/2012/12/11/gri-germanys-corporate-reports-do-not-deliver-what-they-promise/. Accessed September 21, 2014.
Van Wensen, K., Broer, W., Klein, J., & Knopf, J. (2011). The state of play in sustainability reporting in the European Union. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6727&langId=en. Accessed June 7, 2014.
Whiteside, K. H., Boy, D., & Bourg, D. (2010). France’s ‘Grenelle de l’environnement’: Openings and closures in ecological democracy. Environmental Politics, 19(3), 449–467.
Zadek, S., Evans, R., & Pruzan, P. (Eds.). (2013). Building corporate accountability: Emerging practice in social and ethical accounting and auditing. Routledge: London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Camilleri, M.A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Europe. In: Idowu, S. (eds) Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21641-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21641-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21640-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21641-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)