Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural and Compositional Change in Great Smoky Mountains National Park since Protection, 1930s–2000s

  • Chapter
Natural Disturbances and Historic Range of Variation

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 32))

Abstract

When Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP) was placed under strict protection in 1934, about 20 % of the landscape was old-growth forest that had never been logged or farmed, and about 80 % was second growth recovering from logging and settlement. We might expect that the structure of GSMNP’s old-growth forests today would capture the natural range of variation of these southern Appalachian forests, subject only to localized natural disturbances such as landslides, flooding, windthrow, ice storms, and fire. Despite protection, however, multiple indirect, diffuse anthropogenic disturbances including exotic pests, atmospheric deposition, changes in herbivory, and changes in fire regime have continued to affect both old-growth and successional GSMNP forests. Here, we employ a mid-1930s vegetation survey and a compilation of more recent vegetation datasets (1990s–2000s) to compare the historic and present-day range of variation in GSMNP forest structure and composition. Widespread changes in structure reflect succession from historical disturbance and the overlay of continued disturbance, including in formerly undisturbed areas. Species indicative of disturbance and reduced fire frequency are abundant across the landscape in patterns reflecting the legacy of historical disturbance types, continued disturbance, and the interaction of these disturbances with environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J. (2006). Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics, 62, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aneja, V. P., Robarge, W. P., Claiborne, C. S., Murthy, A., Soo-Kim, D., & Li, Z. (1992). Chemical climatology of high elevation spruce-fir forests in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Environmental Pollution, 75, 89–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barden, L. S., & Woods, F. W. (1976). Effects of fire on pine and pine-hardwood forests in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science, 22, 399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K. J., & Kirkby, M. J. (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad, P. V., Swank, W., & Vose, J. (1998). Predicting southern Appalachian overstory vegetation with digital terrain data. Landscape Ecology, 13, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, S. P. (1975). The effect of the European wild boar, Sus scrofa, on gray beech forest in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 56, 1356–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. M., & Honkala, B. H. (tech cords) (1990). Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture handbook 654. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busing, R. T. (1993). Three decades of change at Albright Grove, Tennessee. Castanea, 58, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busing, R. T., & White, P. S. (1993). Effects of area on old-growth forest attributes: Implications for the equilibrium landscape concept. Landscape Ecology, 8, 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busing, R. T., Clebsch, E. E. C., Eagar, C. C., & Pauley, E. F. (1988). Two decades of change in a Great Smoky Mountains spruce-fir forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 115, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busing, R. T., Clebsch, E. E. C., & White, P. S. (1993). Biomass and production of southern Appalachian cove forests reexamined. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 760–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busing, R. T., Stephens, L. A., & Clebsch, E. E. C. (2005). Climate data by elevation in the Great Smoky Mountains: A database and graphical displays for 1947–1950 with comparison to long-term data. Data Series Report DS 115. Reston: USDI US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. M., White, A. S., Elliott, K. J., & Seymour, R. S. (2014). Disturbance history and stand dynamics in secondary and old-growth forests of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 141, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappelka, A., Somers, G., & Renfro, J. (1999). Visible ozone injury on forest trees in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 116, 255–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. (1987). Debris slide and debris flow historical events in the Appalachians south of the glacial border: Geol Soc Am. Reviews in Engineering Geology, VII, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, B. D., & Baker, C. R. (2000). Catastrophic windthrow in the southern Appalachians: Characteristics of pits and mounds and initial vegetation responses. Forest Ecology and Management, 126, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Dellinger, B., Klein, R., & Buchanan, B. (2007). Patterns in lightning-caused fires at Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Fire Ecology, 3, 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, R. O., & Marshall, D. D. (2000). Why quadratic mean diameter? Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 15, 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, H. R., & Delcourt, P. A. (1997). Pre-Columbian Native American use of fire on southern Appalachian landscapes. Conservation Biology, 11, 1010–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagar, C. C. (1984). Review of the biology and ecology of the balsam woolly aphid in southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests. In P. S. White (Ed.), The southern Appalachian spruce-fir ecosystem: Its threats and biology (Research/resources management report SER-71, pp. 36–50). Atlanta: USDI National Park Service Southeast Regional Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. J., & Swank, W. T. (1994). Impacts of drought on tree mortality and growth in a mixed hardwood forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatley, W. T., Lafon, C. W., & Grissino-Mayer, H. D. (2011). Climatic and topographic controls on patterns of fire in the southern and central Appalachian Mountains, USA. Landscape Ecology, 26, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatley, W. T., Lafon, C. W., Grissino-Mayer, H. D., & LaForest, L. B. (2013). Fire history related to climate and land use in three southern Appalachian landscapes in the eastern United States. Ecological Applications, 23, 1250–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C., & Konopik, E. (2007). The history of fire in the southern United States. Human Ecology Review, 14, 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., Spies, T. A., Van Pelt, R., Carey, A. B., Thornburgh, D. A., Berg, D. R., Lindenmayer, D. B., Harmon, M. E., Keeton, W. S., Shaw, D. C., Bible, K., & Chen, J. (2002). Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridley, J. (2009). Downscaling climate over complex terrain: High finescale (<1000 m) spatial variation of near-ground temperatures in a montane forested landscape (Great Smoky Mountains). Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 48, 1033–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groemping, U. (2007). Estimators of relative importance in linear regression based on variance decomposition. American Statistician, 61, 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. B., & Klopfer, S. O. (2006). Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15, 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M. (1981). Fire history of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 1940 to 1979. NPS-SER Res/resource management report no 46. Gatlinburg: USDI National Park Service Southeast Region, Uplands Field Research Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M. (1982). Fire history of the westernmost portion of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 109, 74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M. E., Bratton, S. P., & White, P. S. (1983). Disturbance and vegetation response in relation to environmental gradients in the Great Smoky Mountains. Vegetatio, 55, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, J. C. (1999). Disturbance history and ecological change in a southern Appalachian landscape: Western Great Smoky Mountains National Park 1936–1996. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, J., White, P. S., & Harmon, M. E. (1998). Changes in xeric forests in western Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 1936–1995. Castanea, 63, 346–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, J. C., Harmon, M. E., & White, P. S. (2000). Post-fire succession and 20th century reduction in fire frequency on xeric cites on xeric southern Appalachian sites. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11, 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. (2007). Vegetation communities of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Southeastern Naturalist, 6, 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. A., Klein, R. N., & McDaniel, V. L. (2011). Yellow pine regeneration as a function of fire severity and post-burn stand structure in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 681–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobe, R. T. (2006). Biodiversity and scale: determinants of species richness in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. H., McLaughlin, S. B., Adams, M. B., Cook, E. R., DeHayes, D. H., Eagar, C., Fernandez, I. J., Johnson, D. W., Kohut, R. J., Mohnen, V. A., Nicholas, N. S., Peart, D. R., Schier, G. A., & White, P. S. (1992). Why are red spruce declining at high elevations? A synthesis of epidemiological and mechanistic studies. In C. Eagar & M. B. Adams (Eds.), The ecology and decline of red spruce in the eastern United States. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knebel, L. G. (1999). Changes in old growth hemlock forests of the Cataloochee watershed in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: preparing for the arrival of the hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae). Thesis, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapfl, K. J., Holzmueller, E. J., & Jenkins, M. A. (2011). Early impacts of hemlock woolly adelgid in Tsuga canadensis forest communities of the southern Appalachian Mountains. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 138, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafon, C. W. (2006). Forest disturbance by ice storms in Quercus forests of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Ecoscience, 13, 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landres, P. B., Morgan, P., & Swanson, F. J. (1999). Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecological Applications, 9, 1179–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, J. (2012). Whitebox Geospatial Analysis Tools (GAT) v 2.0. http://www.uoguelph.ca/~hydrogeo/Whitebox/. Accessed 11 Apr 2012.

  • MacKenzie, M. D., & White, P. S. (1998). The vegetation of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 1935–1938. Castanea, 63, 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M., Welch, R., Jordan, T., Jackson, P., Seavey, R., & Seavey, J. (2004). Digital vegetation maps for the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Final report. Center for Remote Sensing and Mapping Science. Athens: University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab, W. H. (1989). Terrain shape index: Quantifying effect of minor landforms on tree height. Forest Science, 35, 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab, W. H. (1993). A topographic index to quantify the effect of mesoscale landform on site productivity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 1100–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., & Ladson, A. R. (1991). Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrocarbon Processing, 5, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninemets, U., & Valladares, F. (2006). Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecological Monographs, 76, 521–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann, J. L., Gregory, M. J., & Spies, T. A. (2007). Influence of environment, disturbance, and ownership on forest vegetation of coastal Oregon. Ecological Applications, 17, 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., & Wagner, H. (2013). Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.0-10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Onken, B., & Reardon, R. (Eds.) (2010). Fifth symposium on hemlock woolly adelgid east US. USDA Forest service report FHTET-2010-07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, C. (1985). Vegetation disturbance history of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: An analysis of archival maps and records (Research resource management report SER-77). Atlanta: USDI National Park Service Southeast Regional Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, C. (1988). The type and extent of anthropogenic vegetation disturbance in the Great Smoky Mountains before National Park Service acquisition. Castanea, 53, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.1.1. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 10 July 2014.

  • Reilly, M. J., Wimberly, M. C., & Newell, C. (2006). Wildfire effects on plant species richness at multiple spatial scales in forest communities of the Southern Appalachians. Journal of Ecology, 94, 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S., Tanksersley, R., & Orvis, K. (2009). Assessing the potential impacts to riparian ecosystems resulting from hemlock mortality in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environmental Management, 44, 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J. R. (1985). Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In S. T. A. Pickett & P. S. White (Eds.), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J. R., & Yetter, T. C. (1987). Treefalls revisited: Gap dynamics in the southern Appalachians. Ecology, 68, 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S. A., Collins, T. K., Kauffman, G. L., McNab, W. H., & Ulrey, C. J. (2005). Ecological zones in the southern Appalachians: First approximation (Research paper SRS-41). Asheville: USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. F., & Nicholas, N. S. (2000). Size-and age-class distributions of Fraser fir following balsam wooly adelgid infestation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30, 948–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. (2012). Forest health monitoring summary, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Natural Resource Data Series NPS/APHN/NRDS-2012/378. Fort Collins: USDI National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, J. P. (2007). Ecotonal change in high-elevation forests of the Great Smoky Mountains, 1930s–2004. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, J. P., & White, P. S. (2011). Understanding 65 years of change in the forests of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Unpublished poster presentation, Biennial conference on international Biogeography Society, Heraklion.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). (2014). Fire effects info system. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree. Accessed 23 Nov 2014.

  • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2009). Soil survey of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Tennessee and North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermast, D. B. (2005). Disturbance and long-term vegetation change in the high-elevation deciduous forests of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. L. (1978). A comparative vegetation analysis of cove hardwood communities in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Thesis, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. D. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis. Poster presentation, 21st annual ESRI user conference, San Diego. http://www.jennessent.com/downloads/tpi-poster-tnc_18x22.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2015.

  • Welch, N. J. (1999). The occurrence of fire in southern Appalachian yellow pine forests as indicated by macroscopic charcoal in soil. Castanea, 64, 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S., & Busing, R. T. (1993). LTERM: Long-term monitoring and research in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Technical report NPS/SERGRSM/NRTR-93/10. Atlanta: USDI National Park Service Southeast Regional Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S., MacKenzie, M. D., & Busing, R. T. (1985). Natural disturbance and gap phase dynamics in southern Appalachian spruce-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. (1956). The vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs, 26, 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. (1966). Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 47, 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, F. W., & Shanks, R. E. (1959). Natural replacement of chestnut by other species in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecology, 40, 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mark Harmon and Scott Pearson for insightful review comments, Dean Urban and Jason Fridley for advice on datasets and analysis, and Cathryn Greenberg and Beverly Collins for the invitation to contribute our work to this book.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology, University of North Carolina, CB #3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3280, USA

    Julie P. Tuttle

  2. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, CB #3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3280, USA

    Peter S. White

Authors
  1. Julie P. Tuttle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter S. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie P. Tuttle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Bent Creek Experimental Forest, Asheville, North Carolina, USA

    Cathryn H. Greenberg

  2. Biology Department, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina, USA

    Beverly S. Collins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tuttle, J.P., White, P.S. (2016). Structural and Compositional Change in Great Smoky Mountains National Park since Protection, 1930s–2000s. In: Greenberg, C., Collins, B. (eds) Natural Disturbances and Historic Range of Variation. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21527-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation