Abstract
Stewart’s strong ion approach to acid–base disorders is increasingly popular, especially in critical care medicine. However, the Henderson–Hasselbalch-based bicarbonate-centered approach remains widely used. Basic concepts and clinical application of these methods are discussed in this chapter.
According to the Stewart approach, only three independent parameters determine [H+] concentration or pH. These are the so-called strong ion difference (SID), the total amount of weak acids (A TOT), and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2). A large contributor to SID is the difference between [Na+] and [Cl−], whereas albumin is the most important contributor to A TOT. If SID decreases, [H+] will increase. If A TOT or PCO2 decreases, [H+] will also decrease. Understanding how physiology and pathophysiology influences [H+] becomes easy when considering their effects on the three independent parameters.
However, provided that hypoalbuminemia is appropriately corrected for, both the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered methods are mathematically compatible and may perform equally well in clinical practice, especially in simple acid–base disorders. However, if acid–base disorders become increasingly complex, which is the case in many critically ill patients, Stewart approach may be superior. In addition, by explicitly clarifying the relationship between electrolyte disorders and acid–base physiology, the Stewart approach helps to demystify the effects of resuscitation fluids on acid–base balance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Management of life-threatening acid–base disorders. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:26–34.
Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Management of life-threatening acid–base disorders. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:107–11.
Fencl V, Jabor A, Kazda A, Figge J. Diagnosis of metabolic acid–base disturbances in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:2246–51.
Figge J, Jabor A, Kazda A, Fencl V. Anion gap and hypoalbuminemia. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1807–10.
Gunnerson KJ, Kellum JA. Acid–base and electrolyte analysis in the critically ill patients: are we ready for the new millennium? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:468–73.
Kellum JA, Elbers PW, editors. Stewart’s textbook of acid-base. Amsterdam: AcidBase.org; 2009.
Kellum JA. Clinical review: reunification of acid-base physiology. Crit Care. 2005;9:500–7.
Levraut J, Grimaud D. Treatment of metabolic acidosis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:260–5.
Rose BD, Post TW, editors. Clinical physiology of acid–base and electrolyte disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
Story DA, Bellomo R. The acid–base physiology of crystalloid solutions. Curr Opin Crit Care. 1999;5:436–9.
Story DA, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R. Strong ions, weak acids and base excess: a simplified Fencl-Stewart approach to clinical acid-base disorders. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:54–60.
Stewart PA. Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983;1:1444–61.
Worthley LI. Strong ion difference: a new paradigm or new clothes for the acid–base emperor. Crit Care Resusc. 1999;1:214.
Wrenn K. The delta (delta) gap: an approach to mixed acid–base disorders. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:1310–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elbers, P.W.G., van Bochove, V.A., Roel Tuinman, P., Gatz, R. (2016). Acid–Base. In: O'Donnell, J., Nácul, F. (eds) Surgical Intensive Care Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19668-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19668-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19667-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19668-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)