Skip to main content

Exploring Composite Retrieval from the Users’ Perspective

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9022))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Aggregating results from heterogeneous sources and presenting them in a blended interface – aggregated search – has become standard practice for most commercial Web search engines. Composite retrieval is emerging as a new search paradigm, where users are presented with semantically aggregated information objects, called bundles, containing results originating from different verticals. In this paper we study composite retrieval from the user perspective. We conducted an exploratory user study where 40 participants were required to manually generate bundles that satisfy various information needs, using heterogeneous results retrieved by modern search engines. Our main objective was to analyse the contents and characteristics of user-generated bundles. Our results show that users generate bundles on common subtopics, centred around pivot documents, and that they favour bundles that are relevant, diverse and cohesive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angel, A., Chaudhuri, S., Das, G., Koudas, N.: Ranking objects based on relationships and fixed associations. In: EDBT 2009, pp. 910–921 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arguello, J., Capra, R.: The effect of aggregated search coherence on search behavior. In: CIKM 2012, pp. 1293–1302 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, P., Craswell, N., White, R.W., Chen, L., Satyanarayana, A., Tahaghoghi, S.M.: Evaluating search systems using result page context. In: IIiX 2010, pp. 105-114 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bota, H., Zhou, K., Jose, J.M., Lalmas, M.: Composite retrieval of heterogeneous web search. In: WWW 2014, pp. 119–130 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bron, M., van Gorp, J., Nack, F., Baltussen, L.B., de Rijke, M.: Aggregated search interface preferences in multi-session search tasks. In: SIGIR 2013, pp. 123–132 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corley, C., Mihalcea, R.: Measuring the semantic similarity of texts. In: EMSEE 2005, pp. 13–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demeester, T., Trieschnigg, D., Nguyen, D., Hiemstra, D.: Overview of the trec 2013 federated web search track. In: Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference, pp. 1–11 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deng, T., Fan, W., Geerts, F.: On the complexity of package recommendation problems. In: PODS 2012, pp. 261-272 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diaz, F., Lalmas, M., Shokouhi, M.: From federated to aggregated search. In: SIGIR 2010, p. 910 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Golbus, P.B., Zitouni, I., Kim, J.Y., Hassan, A., Diaz, F.: Contextual and dimensional relevance judgments for reusable serp-level evaluation. In: WWW 2014, pp. 131–142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, X., Ishikawa, Y.: Multi-objective optimal combination queries. In: Hameurlain, A., Liddle, S.W., Schewe, K.-D., Zhou, X. (eds.) DEXA 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6860, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen, B.J., Pooch, U.: A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(3), 235–246 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. CoRR, cmp-lg/9709008 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Käki, M.: Findex: Search result categories help users when document ranking fails. In: CHI 2005, pp. 131–140 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mendez-Diaz, I., Zabala, P., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., Feuerstein, E., Amer-Yahia, S.: Composite retrieval of diverse and complementary bundles. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 99(preprints), 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rose, D.E., Levinson, D.: Understanding user goals in web search. In: WWW 2004, pp. 13-19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spink, A., Jansen, B.J., Wolfram, D., Saracevic, T.: From e-sex to e-commerce: Web search changes. Computer 35(3), 107–109 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sushmita, S., Joho, H., Lalmas, M., Villa, R.: Factors affecting click-through behavior in aggregated search interfaces. In: CIKM 2010, pp. 519–528 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson, M.L., Kules, B., Schraefel, M.C., Shneiderman, B.: Designing future search interfaces for the web. Found. Trends Web Sci. 2(1), 1–97 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yue, Z., Han, S., He, D.: Modeling search processes using hidden states in collaborative exploratory web search. In: CSCW 2014, pp. 820–830 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, K., Cummins, R., Lalmas, M., Jose, J.M.: Evaluating aggregated search pages. In: SIGIR 2012, pp. 115–124. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, K., Cummins, R., Lalmas, M., Jose, J.M.: Which vertical search engines are relevant? In: WWW 2013, pp. 1557-1568 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bota, H., Zhou, K., Jose, J.J. (2015). Exploring Composite Retrieval from the Users’ Perspective. In: Hanbury, A., Kazai, G., Rauber, A., Fuhr, N. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16354-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16354-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16353-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16354-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics