Abstract
The aim of the paper is to define a remit of interest for design and designers in the field of products and services employing human face as an interface with users. From the point of view of design culture, humanoid artifacts, are at the intersection of product design, visual communication, and interaction design. The release of open hardware platforms, such as Arduino Robot, as well as the diffusion of fabrication laboratories (fablabs) and open design practices are the early manifestations of a wider interest toward social robotics accompanied by the possibility of building working prototypes of humanoid artifacts. The use of human face as interface in human–computer interaction adds analogic content to interaction processes in an unmediated and unobtrusive way, transferring human–computer interaction to the field of interpersonal communication. Nevertheless, the field of anthropomorphic artifacts is generally neglected by designers and rather controlled by engineers and experimental psychologists. Starting from a definition and taxonomy of humanoid artifacts, the aim of this chapter is to describe the paradigm of human–computer interaction through case studies of humanoid artifacts and to define criteria for the evaluation of humanoid artifacts from the perspective of design practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Arduino Robot, http://arduino.cc/en/Main/Robot (retrieved on 20/11/2014).
- 2.
3D Printed Animatronic Robot Head, https://learn.adafruit.com/3d-printed-animatronic-robot-head?view=all#mission-control (retrieved on 20/11/2014).
- 3.
An Open Source Cognitive Humanoid Robotic Platform, http://www.icub.org (retrieved on 20/11/2014); An Open Framework for Research in Embodied Cognition, http://www.robotcub.org (retrieved on 20/11/2014).
- 4.
Open-Source 3D Printed Life-Size Robot, http://www.inmoov.fr (retrieved on 20/11/2014).
- 5.
http://www.thingiverse.com/hairygael/designs (retrieved 21/2/2015).
- 6.
Edubots: Ono, http://io.workspace.howest.be/edubots/ono/ (retrieved on 20/11/2014).
References
Abid MR, Meszaros Ph E, da Silva RF, Petriu EM (2014) Dynamic hand gesture recognition for human-robot and inter-robot communication. In: Proceeding of the 2014 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and virtual environments for measurement systems and applications (CIVEMSA), May 5–7, 2014, pp 12–17
Archer D, Iritani B, Kimes DD, Barrios M (1983) Face-ism: five studies of sex difference. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:725–735
Baichtal J (2014) Robot builder: the beginner’s guide to building robots. Que, Indianapolis
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, Jeju, 2007, pp 368–373
Cangiano S, Romano Z (2015) Open sourcing wearables: the impact of open technologies and user engagement in the design of body-borne interactive products. In: Bihanic D (ed) Empowering users through design. Interdisciplinary studies and combined approaches for technological products and services. Springer, London
Costa M, Ricci Bitti PE (2000) Face-ism effect and head canting in one’s own and others photographs. Eur Psychol 4:293–301
Gibb A (2014) Building open source hardware: DIY manufacturing for hackers and makers. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston
Hornyak TN (2006) Loving the machine: The art and science of Japanese robots. Kodansha, Tokyo
Johnson BD (2014) 21st century robots. Maker Media, Sebastopol
Legrenzi P (2002) La mente. Il Mulino, Bologna
Maeda J (2005) The laws of simplicity. MIT Press, Cambridge
MacDorman KF (2005) Androids as experimental apparatus: why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? In: CogSci 2005 Workshop: toward social mechanism of android, Stresa, pp 106–118
Maldonado T (2005) Disegno industriale: un riesame. Feltrinelli, Milan
Maldonado T (2003) The body: artificialization and transparency. In: Fortunati L, Katz JE, Riccini R (eds) Mediating the human body: technology, communication, and fashion. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 15–22
Margolis M (2013) Make and Arduino-controlled robot. O’Reilly, Sebastopol
McComb G (2013) Arduino robot bonanza. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York
Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35
Seyama J, Nagayama R (2007) The uncanny valley: effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence 16(4):337–351
Tsagarakis NG, Metta G, Sandini G, Vernon D, Beira R, Becchi F, Righetti L, Santos-Victor J, Ijspeert AJ, Carrozza MC, Caldwell DG (2007) iCub: the design and realization of an open humanoid platform for cognitive and neuroscience research. Adv Robot 21(10):1151–1175
Vandevelde C et al. (2014) Ono, a DIY open source platform for social robotics. In: Proceedings of TEI 2014, 16–19 Feb 2014, Munich, Germany
Watzlawick P, Helmick Beavin J, Jackson DD (1967) Pragmatic of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. Norton & Co, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fornari, D., Cangiano, S. (2015). Open Sourcing Social Robotics: Humanoid Artifacts from the Viewpoint of Designers. In: Vincent, J., Taipale, S., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., Fortunati, L. (eds) Social Robots from a Human Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15672-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15672-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15671-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15672-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)