Skip to main content

Understanding Entrepreneurship Through the Enrichment of Institutional Theory by Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Culture
  • 1393 Accesses

Abstract

This work offers a deeper evaluation of entrepreneurship through institutional theory understanding, in which the technical-economic sphere is not only complemented by a social perspective, but also structured and governed in an ethical manner. Based on a hermeneutic approach, it argues there are primarily three distinct logics or rationalities (technical-economic, psycho-social and ethical-anthropological) which are nonetheless compatible and united in one sole agent and in one unique human action. This proposal is an essential complement to institutional theory findings related to entrepreneurship, allowing a sound dialog between technical, social and ethical aspects of entrepreneurship where profit is not excluded, but, rather, considered as a means for achieving human and social ends—thereby radically eliminating the purely instrumental perspective of the human being. The review of the category of entrepreneurship, based on institutional theories, evidences the need to incorporate anthropology and ethics which is explicitly done through an open dialogue that contemplates and integrates all of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). New York: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(5), 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, C. E. (1952). The industrial economy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A. L., & Johnson, R. W. (1989). Entrepreneurship: A social psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, O. F., Moore, D. G., & Unwalla, D. B. (1964). The enterprising Man. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Business Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S. M. (1990). The new institutionalism: What can it learn from the old? Industrial Relations, 29(2), 316–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, S. (2007). Rewriting the opportunity theory. Paper presented at RENT XXI, Cardiff, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Amonson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 137–230). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment. New York: Absenteeism and Turnover.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polo, L. & Llano, C. (1997). Antropología de la Acción Directiva (pp. 15–30, 65–70). Madrid, Spain: Unión Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Gorostiza, J. L. (2013). Thorstein Veblen, el inclasificable. Revista de Economía Crítica, 16, 323–332. segundo semestre ISNN 2013-5254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. (2000). Understanding institutional economics: 1918-1929. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(3), 277–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Irvine, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, B. B. (1967). Principales corrientes de la ciencia económica moderna: El pensamiento económico después de 1870. Barcelona, Spain: Oikos-Tau, S.A. Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbano-Pulido, D., Diaz-Casero, J. C., & Hernández Mogollón, R. (2007). Evolución y principios de la teoría económica institucional. Condicionantes de la creación de empresas. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. (1961). In why is economics not an evolutionary science? In The place of science in modern civilization (pp. 56–81). New York: Russell and Russell (Original work published 1898).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. (1967). Absentee ownership and business enterprise in recent times. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. (1974). Teoría de la clase ociosa. México city, México: FCE (Original work published 1899).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veciana, J. M. (1999). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veciana, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a scientific research programme. In A. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, & S. Roig (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and perspective (pp. 23–71). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veciana, J. M., & Urbano, D. (2008). The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction. International Entrepreneurship Manager Journal, 4, 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis J. Bañón-Gomis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bañón-Gomis, A.J. (2015). Understanding Entrepreneurship Through the Enrichment of Institutional Theory by Ethics. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Merigó-Lindahl, J. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Culture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15111-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics