Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy pp 3162–3174Cite as

Subject/Object, Renaissance Concept of

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 12 Accesses

Abstract

The pair of concepts subject/object derives from the Greek hypokeímenon and antikeímenon and from medieval usages of the verbs subiicio and obiicio, which actually mean the opposite of their post-Cartesian usages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Aquinas. Summa theologica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Analytica posteriora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. De anima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Ethica nicomachea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Metaphysica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averroes. 1562–1574. Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis. Venice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beurhaus, F. 1588. De P. Rami dialecticae. . .quae paedagogiae logicae pars secunda. Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgersdijk, F. 1626. Institutionum logicarum libri duo. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1637. Discours de la méthode. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goclenius, R. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum. Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1801. Differenzschrift. Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keckermann, B. 1614. Operum omnium quae extant. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. 1597. Compendium metaphysicum ad libros metaphysicorum archiphilosophi Aristotelis aliorumque metaphysicorum commentaria rectius cognoscenda, traditum in illustri Julia a Cornelio Martini Andvverpio, logices ibidem professore acutissimo. Ms. Helmstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. 1604a. Disputationum metaphysicarum prima. Helmstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. 1604b. Disputationum metaphysicarum secunda de subiecto metaphysicae. Helmstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. 1605. Metaphysica commentatio. In ed. K. Bartholin. Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. 1607. Disputationum metaphysicarum quarta de primo cognitionis principio, tam incomplexo quam complexo. Helmstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. 1622. Metaphysica commentatio. Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melanchthon, P. 1520. Compendiaria dialectices ratio. Wittenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothold, A. 1597. De Rameae institutionis principiis et natura logicae. Lemgo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothold, A. 1598. Diatribe philosophica qua doctrina de definitione et divisione dialecticae, de notionibus primis et secundis, de argumentis inventionis et praedicabilibus, de analysi logica Rameorum, de metaphysica et praedicamentis ad Philippi et Rami documenta revocatur ac judicatur. Lemgo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, P. 1570. Institutionum dialecticarum libri tres. In ed. A. Talaeus. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, P. 1572. Dialecticae libri duo. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluter, S. 1610. Anatomia logicae aristotelicae sive syncrisis logica. Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza de, B. 1677. Opera posthuma. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabarella, J. 1597. Opera logica. In ed. J.L. Hawenreuther. Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Ashworth, E.J. 1974. Language and logic in the post-medieval period. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E.J. 1997. Petrus Fonseca on objective concepts and the analogy of Being. In Logic and the workings of the mind, ed. P.E. Easton, 47–63. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, L. 1981. Obiectum: notes on the invention of a word. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 56: 37–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, P.E. 1997. Preface. In Logic and the workings of the mind, ed. P.E. Easton, i–vi. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucken, R. 1879. Geschichte der philosophischen Terminologie im Umriss. Leipzig: Veit.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. 1975. Knowledge and the known. Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K. 1969. Zum Begriff ‘Subjektivität’ bis 1802. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11: 184–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. 1988. Epistemology of the sciences. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. C.B. Schmitt et al., 685–711. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karskens, K., et al. 1998. Subjekt/Objekt; subjektiv/objektiv. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 10, ed. J. Ritter and K. Gründer, 401–433. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kible, B., et al. 1998. Subjekt. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 10, ed. J. Ritter and K. Gründer, 373–400. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. 1997. Kant on logic and self-consciousness. In Logic and the workings of the mind, ed. P.E. Easton, 175–190. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobusch, T. 1984. Objekt. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 6, ed. J. Ritter and K. Gründer, 1026–1052. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, M. 1997. The Wolffian background of Kant’s transcendental deduction. In Logic and the workings of the mind, ed. P.E. Easton, 229–250. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignucci, M. 1993. The Stoic themata. In Dialektiker and Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, ed. K. Döring and T. Ebert, 217–238. Stuttgart: Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugnai, M. 1979. Intensionale Kontexte und termini reduplicativi in der Grammatica rationis von Leibniz. Studia leibnitiana Sonderheft 8: 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. 1951. Soggetto e oggetto del conoscere nella filosofia antica e medievale. Rome: Universale di Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans, G. 1973. Theories of the proposition: ancient and medieval conceptions on the bearers of truth and falsity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans, G. 1980. Late scholastic and humanist theories of the proposition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans, G. 1982. Judgment and proposition: from Descartes to Kant. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, R.H. 1988. Theory of knowledge. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, 688–74, ed. C.B. Schmitt et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo, R. 1992. Ramismus II. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 8, ed. J. Ritter and K. Gründer, 15–17. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo, R. 1998. Res considerata and modus considerandi rem: Averroes, Aquinas, Jacopo Zabarella, and Cornelius Martini on Reduplication. Medioevo 24: 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo, R. 1999. Thema I. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 11, ed. J. Ritter and K. Gründer, 1059–1061. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo, R. 2002. Ramus and other Renaissance philosophers on subjectivity. Topoi 22: 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo, R. 2012. Adversus Ramistas: Kontroversen über die Natur der Logik am Ende der Renaissance. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, W. 1960. Die Entwicklung der Dialektik bei Petrus Ramus. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42: 36–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, W. 1963. Zur Vorgeschichte der cartesischen Methodenlehre. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 45: 268–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, W. 1964. Logik der Neuzeit: 1500–1640. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: F. Frommann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. 1997. Berkeley’s metaphysics and Ramist logic. In Logic and the workings of the mind, ed. P.E. Easton, 109–136. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Cultural Heritage, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy

    Riccardo Pozzo

Authors
  1. Riccardo Pozzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Pozzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Philosophy a. Cultural Heritage, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Venezia, Italy

    Marco Sgarbi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pozzo, R. (2022). Subject/Object, Renaissance Concept of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_241

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation