Skip to main content

Abstract

In Part 2, a step-by-step practical guide is provided to educate and guide practitioners in the correct application of the mode deactivation methodology, starting from the client typology survey, to the rest of the assessment process—Fear Assessment, Compound Core Beliefs Questionnaire (CCBQ)—to the supplementary mindfulness practice exercises, case conceptualization, Validation–Clarification–Redirection (VCR) treatment step, and final reinforcement and wrap-up before Mode Deactivation Therapy (MDT) program completion. In this chapter the client typology survey, Fear Assessment, and CCBQ is explained in terms of construct, structure, contents, objective, application, preparation, administration, scoring, and interpretation, noting any special considerations or focus areas along the way. The typical overall session-by-session schedule that was covered in Chap. 1 (Introduction and Cost–Benefit Analysis), will also be briefly repeated, followed by these interviews and assessments that are conducted in the first four sessions or so. As such, this chapter will enable the clinician to conduct his or her own family-based MDT evaluations in the correct order and interpreted appropriately to follow an accurate and meaningful case conceptualization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apsche, J. A., & DiMeo, L. (2012). Mode deactivation therapy for aggression and oppositional behavior in adolescents: An integrative methodology using ACT, DBT, and CBT. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz, A., Dreessen, L., Schouten, E., & Weertman, A. (2004). Beliefs in personality disorders: A test with the Personality Disorder Belief Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1215–1225. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, S. S., Beck, A. T., & Butler, A. C. (2012). Beliefs and personality disorders: An overview of the personality beliefs questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 88–100. doi:10.1002/jclp.20856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The Personality Belief Questionnaire. Unpublished assessment instrument, The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research, Bala Cynwyd, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briere, J. (1996). Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strohsal, K., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., & Follette, V. M. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimension approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fledderus, M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Pieterse, M. E. (2010). Does experiential avoidance mediate the effects of maladaptive coping styles on psychopathology and mental health? Behavior Modification, 34(6), 503–519. doi:10.1177/0145445510378379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. H., Burrell-Hodgon, G., & Tate, G. (2007). Relationships between the personality beliefs questionnaire and self-rated personality disorders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(2), 247–251. doi:10.1348/014466506X164791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, D. T., Lopes, E. J., & Lopes, R. F. F. (2012). Psychometric characteristics of the Personality Belief Questionnaire—Short Form. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 14(3), 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, L. K., & Young, J. E. (1996). Schema-focused therapy. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 182–207). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M., & Fanning, P. (1991). Prisoners of belief: Exposing & changing beliefs that control your life. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopa, L., Thorne, P., Waters, A., & Preston, J. (2001). Are the short and long forms of Young Schema Questionnaire comparable and how well does each version predict psychopathology scores? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 15(3), 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E. (1990). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E. (2005). Young Schema Questionnaire—Short version (YSQ-S3). Unpublished assessment instrument, Schema Therapy Institute, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swart, J., Bass, C.K., Apsche, J.A. (2015). MDT Assessment Processes. In: Treating Adolescents with Family-Based Mindfulness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12700-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics