Skip to main content

Rule-Following and Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 111))

  • 1521 Accesses

Abstract

This paper applies some logical devices taken from standard deontic logic and general metalogic to analysis of rule-following and its paradoxes as formulated by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his later works and recently popularized and analyzed by Saul Kripke. In particular, the paper argues that the Kripkenstein problem, related to the arithmetical operation called quus is apparent. In the final part, the question of rule-following of logical rules is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The ascribing of intentionality (see (c)) can be more complex in the case of abstaining from an action.

  2. 2.

    This statement is simplified due to possible exceptions.

  3. 3.

    The point (i) is formulated by the formula x ⊕ y = x + y, if x, y > 57 in the first edition of Kripke (1982). It is an obvious error, because 57 ⊕ 68 should give 125 as the result. Further editions corrected this mistake.

  4. 4.

    I do not speak about standard and non-standard models, because principles governing arithmetic with quus are unclear (see above).

  5. 5.

    I disregard here the problem of non-standard (in the technical sense) arithmetic, for example, arithmetical theories used in non-standard analysis. I only remark that we can either note that we theories belong to the same arithmetical class or to operate by various spheres of arithmetical OB.

References

  • Brożek, Bartosz. 2012. Rule-following. From imitation to the normative mind. Kraków: Copernicus Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbs, Gary. 1997. Rule following and realism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Woleński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woleński, J. (2015). Rule-Following and Logic. In: Araszkiewicz, M., Banaś, P., Gizbert-Studnicki, T., Płeszka, K. (eds) Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09375-8_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics