Skip to main content

Modelling Landslide Susceptibility for a Large Geographical Area Using Weights of Evidence in Lower Austria, Austria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 2

Abstract

Knowledge of the spatial distribution of landslide susceptibility supports and enhances decision-making involved in land-use planning for mitigating the impacts of landslide hazards. Our study focuses on the application of the weights of evidence (WOE) method to statistically model landslide susceptibility for a large area in the Austrian province of Lower Austria. Approximately 16,000 km2 was modelled with a 10 m × 10 m spatial resolution. To complete this task, a new implementation of WOE in R was developed, a free open source software for statistical computing, to handle the computation of weights for large geospatial datasets. Furthermore, the challenge of modelling diverse landslide conditions for a large area was addressed by modelling WOE separately for each lithology unit. The final susceptibility map was compiled by mosaicking these models. The performances of the models were estimated with a repeated cross-validation approach that measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The results showed good WOE model performances; the median AUROC values ranged from 73 to 93 %, with an average performance of 86 % for the entire study area. Also, this study demonstrated the successful application of WOE for a large geographic area with a high spatial resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blahut J, van Westen CJ, Sterlacchini S (2010) Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas. Geomorphology 119(1):36–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter G (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS ,vol 13. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Guthrie RH, Brenning A (2011) Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models. Geomorphology 129(3):376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2002) Landslide susceptibility analysis and verification using the Bayesian probability model. Environ Geol 43(1–2):120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86(1):12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petschko H, Bell R, Brenning A, Glade T (2012) Landslide susceptibility modeling with generalized additive models—facing the heterogeneity of large regions. In: Eberhardt E, Froese C, Turner AK, Leroueil S (eds) Landslides and Engineered Slopes, Protecting Society through Improved Understanding. Taylor & Francis, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp 769–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Petschko H, Brenning A, Bell R, Goetz J, Glade T (2014) Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps—case study Lower Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:95–118. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-95-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30(3):399–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice, Natural Hazards No. 3, IAEG Commission on Landslides and other Mass-Movements, UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots. Clin Chem 39:561–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason N. Goetz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goetz, J.N., Cabrera, R., Brenning, A., Heiss, G., Leopold, P. (2015). Modelling Landslide Susceptibility for a Large Geographical Area Using Weights of Evidence in Lower Austria, Austria. In: Lollino, G., et al. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_160

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics