Skip to main content

The Logical Structure of Scanlon’s Contractualism

  • Conference paper
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems (DEON 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8554))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we use fixed-point modal logic to study the logical properties of justified norms in Scanlonian contractualism. We show a natural connection between Scanlon’s test for justifiability and the computation of the smallest fixed point; we rebut a common charge of vacuity based on the recursive character of the proposal; we show that the resulting justification operator is not a normal modality, and we explore the epistemic component often left implicit in the justification procedure. Given that such procedural justifications have so far not been investigated using modern logical tools, this paper contributes both to deontic logic and to the literature on contractualism in ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barry, B.M.: Justice as impartiality. Oxford UP (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fontaine, G.M.M.: Modal fixpoint logic: some model theoretic questions. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Menzies, P.: Counterfactual theories of causation. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 edn. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pogge, T.W.: What we can reasonably reject. Nous 35(s1), 118–147 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scanlon, T.: What we owe to each other. Harvard University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, M.: The moral problem (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tarski, A., et al.: A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5(2), 285–309 (1955)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Venema, Y.: Lectures on the modal μ-calculus (2008) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rechenauer, M., Roy, O. (2014). The Logical Structure of Scanlon’s Contractualism. In: Cariani, F., Grossi, D., Meheus, J., Parent, X. (eds) Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. DEON 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08614-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08615-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics