Abstract
It has now been recognised that environmental issues entail both a social conflict (private vs. public interests) and a temporal conflict (short- vs. long-term interests). Supporting this view, several studies have shown that greater future time perspective is associated with higher pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours. A recent meta-analytical summary of 19 independent samples (comprising more than 6,000 participants from seven countries) published by our research group has shown a medium effect size on the influence between future time perspective and environmental engagement. This chapter will first provide a theoretical summary of the links between time perspective (and in particular future time perspective) and environmental issues. This chapter will then review studies examining associations between future time perspective and environmental engagement at the individual and societal level. Implications and future directions for research in the area will also be discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnocky, S., Milfont, T. L., & Nicol, J. (2014). Time perspective and sustainable behaviour: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior, 46, 556–582.
Block, R. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.
Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.
Collins, W., Colman, R., Haywood, J., Manning, M. R., & Mote, P. (2007). The physical science behind climate change. Scientific American, 297, 64–71.
Corral-Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2006). Sustainability, future orientation and water conservation. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 191–198.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40, 139–147.
Demarque, C., Apostolidis, T., & Joule, R. V. (2012). Does binding communication increase consideration of future consequences and decision making facing a pro-environmental behavior? In S. Kabisch, A. Kunath, P. Schweizer-Ries, & A. Steinführer (Eds.), Vulnerability, risks, and complexity: Impacts of global change on human habitats (pp. 221–229). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Demarque, C., Apostolidis, T., & Joule, R. V. (2013). Consideration of future consequences and pro-environmental decision making in the context of persuasion and binding commitment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 214–220.
Dubois, N. (Ed.). (2003). A sociocognitive approach to social norms. London: Routledge.
Ebreo, A., & Vining, J. (2001). How similar are recycling and waste reduction? Future orientation and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 424–448.
Evans, L., Milfont, T. L., & Lawrence, J. (2014). Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate. Global Environmental Change, 25, 69–75.
Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 35–43.
Fox, M., Tost, L. P., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (2010). The legacy motive: A catalyst for sustainable decision making in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 153–185.
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718.
Guignard, S., Apostolidis, T., & Demarque, C. (2014). Discussing normative features of future time perspective construct: Renewing with the Lewinian approach from a sociocognitive perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 1–10.
Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2003). The effects of a brief time perspective intervention for increasing physical activity among young adults. Psychology and Health, 18, 685–706.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Joireman, J. A. (2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 289–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133–155.
Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187–206.
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272–1287.
Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620.
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681–1685.
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2006). Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 603–615.
Lasane, T. P., & O’Donnell, D. A. (2005). Time orientation measurement: A conceptual approach. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 11–30). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201–1205.
Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1799–1823.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Milfont, T. L. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human psychology. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. H. GarcÃa-Cadena, & M. FrÃas-Arment (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice (pp. 19–42). New York: Nova Science.
Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72–82.
Milfont, T. L., & Schwarzenthal, M. (2014). Explaining why larks are future-oriented and owls are present-oriented: Self-control mediates the chronotype-time perspective relationships. Chronobiology International, 31, 581–588.
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Exploring the concept of environmental generativity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4, 21–30.
Milfont, T. L., Abrahamse, W., & McCarthy, N. (2011). Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 56–67.
Milfont, T. L., Harré, N., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2012a). The climate change dilemma: Examining the association between parental status and political party support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2386–2410.
Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. K. C. (2012b). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 209–218.
Moser, G. (2009). Psychologie environnementale: Les relations homme-environnement [Environmental psychology: Man-environment relations]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Niemeijer, D., & de Groot, R. S. (2008). Framing environmental indicators: Moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10, 89–106.
Nowack, K., Milfont, T. L., & van der Meer, E. (2013). Future versus present: Time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 173–182.
Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2011). Overcoming the distance: Perspective taking with future humans improves environmental engagement. Environment and Behaviour, 20, 1–15.
Pawlik, K. (1991). The psychology of global environmental change: Some basic data and an agenda for cooperative international research. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 547–563.
Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641–651.
Rabinovich, A., Morton, T., & Postmes, T. (2010). Time perspective and attitude-behaviour consistency in future-oriented behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 69–89.
Schultz, P. W., Milfont, T. L., Chance, R. C., Tronu, G., LuÃs, S., Ando, K., et al. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 46, 267–302.
Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1–22.
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972.
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
Stern, P. C. (2005). Understanding individuals’ environmentally significant behavior. Environmental Law Reporter, 35(11), 785–790.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2011). Construal level theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume One (pp. 118–134). London: Sage.
Van Lange, P. A., & Joireman, J. A. (2008). How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 127–157.
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tost, L. P., Hernandez, M., & Larrick, R. P. (2012). It’s only a matter of time: Intergenerational beneficence as a death anxiety buffer. Psychological Science, 23, 704–709.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.
Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milfont, T.L., Demarque, C. (2015). Understanding Environmental Issues with Temporal Lenses: Issues of Temporality and Individual Differences. In: Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., van Beek, W. (eds) Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07367-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07368-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)