Abstract
This chapter details the neural circuitry that controls the mechanisms that regulate urinary and intestinal functions, describing the afferent and efferent neuronal pathways between the brain and the pelvic organs.
After a functional anatomical approach, the neurophysiological investigations valuable in the assessment of patients with urogenital and anorectal dysfunctions are reported. On assessing a patient with neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction, different neurophysiological methods are described, in particular electromyography (EMG), sacral reflexes, somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP), motor-evoked potential (MEP), sympathetic skin response (SSR), and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML). Moreover, technical advice is given, reporting normative values and discussing neurophysiological tests clinical applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fowler CJ (1999) Neurological disorders of micturition and their treatment. Brain 122:1213–1231
Mayer EA, Gebhart GF (1994) Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hyperalgesia. Gastroenterology 107:271–293
Abbott RD, Petrovitch H, White LR et al (2001) Frequency of bowel movements and the future risk of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 57:456–462
Hobday DI, Aziz Q, Thacker N et al (2001) A study of the cortical processing of ano-rectal sensation using functional MRI. Brain 124:361–368
Podnar S (2003) Electrodiagnosis of the anorectum: a review of techniques and clinical applications. Tech Coloproctol 7:71–76
Podnar S, Vodusek DB (2001) Protocol for clinical neurophysiologic examination of the pelvic floor. Neurourol Urodyn 20:669–682
Pedersen E, Klemar B, Schrøder HD et al (1982) Anal sphincter responses after perianal electrical stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45:770–773
Swash M (1982) Early and late components in the human anal reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45:767–769
Vodusek DB, Janko M, Lokar J (1983) Direct and reflex responses in perineal muscles on electrical stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:67–71
Fowler CJ (2001) A neurologist’s clinical and investigative approach to patients with bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. In: Fowler CJ, Brady CM, Frohman EM, Sakakibara R, Stewart JD (eds) Neurologic bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–6
Podnar S (2004) Criteria for neuropathic abnormality in quantitative anal sphincter electromyography. Muscle Nerve 30:596–601
Floyd WF, Walls EW (1953) Electromyography of the sphincter ani externus in man. J Physiol 122:599–609
Swash M (1992) Electromyography in pelvic floor disorders. In: Henry MM, Swash M (eds) Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 184–195
Podnar S (2007) Neurophysiology of the neurogenic lower urinary tract disorders. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1423–1437
Podnar S, Mrkaić M (2002) Predictive power of motor unit potential parameters in anal sphincter electromyography. Muscle Nerve 26:389–394
Cheong DM, Vaccaro CA, Salanga VD et al (1995) Electrodiagnostic evaluation of fecal incontinence. Muscle Nerve 18:612–619
Fowler CJ, Benson JT, Craggs MD et al (2002) Clinical neurophysiology. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. 2nd international consultation on incontinence. Plymbridge Distributors, Plymouth, pp 389–424
Ertekin C, Reel F (1976) Bulbocavernosus reflex in normal men and in patients with neurogenic bladder and/or impotence. J Neurol Sci 28:1–15
Vodusek DB, Janko M (1990) The bulbocavernosus reflex. A single motor neuron study. Brain 113:813–820
Vodusek DB, Amarenco G, Podnar S (2009) Clinical neurophysiological tests. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 523–540
Pelliccioni G, Scarpino O (2006) External anal sphincter responses after S3 spinal root surface electrical stimulation. Neurourol Urodyn 25:788–791
Aminoff MJ, Eisen AA (1998) AAEM minimonograph 19: somatosensory evoked potentials. Muscle Nerve 21:277–290
Haldeman S, Bradley WE, Bhatia NN et al (1983) Cortical evoked potentials on stimulation of pudendal nerve in women. Urology 21:590–593
Guérit JM, Opsomer RJ (1991) Bit-mapped imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the posterior tibial nerves and dorsal nerve of the penis/clitoris. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 80:228–237
Delodovici ML, Fowler CJ (1995) Clinical value of the pudendal somatosensory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:509–515
Loening-Baucke V, Read NW, Yamada T et al (1994) Evaluation of the motor and sensory components of the pudendal nerve. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:35–41
Yang CC, Kromm BG (2004) New techniques in female pudendal somatosensory evoked potential testing. Somatosens Mot Res 21:9–14
Haldeman S, Bradley WE, Bhatia N (1982) Evoked responses from the pudendal nerve. J Urol 128:974–980
Remes-Troche JM, Tantiphlachiva K, Attaluri A et al (2011) A bi-directional assessment of the human brain-anorectal axis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 23:240–248
Pelliccioni G, Piloni V, Sabbatini D et al (2014) Sex differences in pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials. Tech Coloproctol 18:565–569
Ashraf VV, Taly AB, Nair KP et al (2005) Role of clinical neurophysiological tests in evaluation of erectile dysfunction in people with spinal cord disorders. Neurol India 53:32–35
Sartucci F, Piaggesi A, Logi F et al (1999) Impaired ascendant central pathways conduction in impotent diabetic subjects. Acta Neurol Scand 99:381–386
Kaiser T, Jost WH, Osterhage J et al (2001) Penile and perianal pudendal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 13:89–92
Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1:1106–1107
Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A et al (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:97–103
Opsomer RJ, Caramia MD, Zarola F et al (1989) Neurophysiological evaluation of central-peripheral sensory and motor pudendal fibres. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74:260–270
Pelliccioni G, Scarpino O, Piloni V (1997) Motor evoked potentials recorded from external anal sphincter by cortical and lumbo-sacral magnetic stimulation: normative data. J Neurol Sci 149:69–72
Brostrom S, Jennum P, Lose G (2003) Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter and puborectal muscle: normative values. Neurourol Urodyn 22:306–313
Gunnarsson M, Ahlmann S, Lindstrom S et al (1999) Cortical magnetic stimulation in patients with genuine stress incontinence: correlation with results of pelvic floor exercises. Neurourol Urodyn 18:437–444
Brostrom S, Frederiksen JL, Jennum P et al (2003) Motor evoked potentials from the pelvic floor in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:498–500
Jennum P, Jensen L, Fenger K et al (2001) Motor evoked potentials from the external anal sphincter in patients with autosomal dominant pure spastic paraplegia linked to chromosome 2p. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:561–562
Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu P et al (1984) Sympathetic skin response: a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:536–542
Uncini A, Pullman SL, Lovelace RE et al (1988) The sympathetic skin response: normal values, elucidation of afferent components and application limits. J Neurol Sci 87:299–306
Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P et al (2003) Sympathetic skin response: basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 13:256–270
Rodic B, Curt A, Dietz V et al (2000) Bladder neck incompetence in patients with spinal cord injury: significance of sympathetic skin response. J Urol 163:1223–1227
Schurch B, Curt A, Rossier AB (1997) The value of sympathetic skin response recordings in the assessment of the vesicourethral autonomic nervous dysfunction in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 157:2230–2233
Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC et al (1985) Perineal nerve damage in genuine stress urinary incontinence. An electrophysiological study. Br J Urol 57:422–426
Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr et al (1998) Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1516–1522
Bakas P, Liapis A, Karandreas A et al (2001) Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in women with genuine stress incontinence and prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Invest 51:187–190
Roig JV, Villoslada C, Lledo S et al (1995) Prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence. Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:952–958
Barnett JL, Hasler WL, Camilleri M (1999) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology 116:732–760
Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG et al (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mrs. Rosa Luana and Mr. Marzio Marcellini for their skilful technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pelliccioni, G., Pelliccioni, P. (2015). Neurophysiology and Neurophysiological Evaluation of the Pelvic Floor. In: Martellucci, J. (eds) Electrical Stimulation for Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06947-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06947-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06946-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06947-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)