Skip to main content

Robust Expansion of Experimental Mode Shapes Under Epistemic Uncertainties

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3

Abstract

Important variations in response behaviors of power plant generators are observed in a population of nominally identical installations due to numerous and significant sources of variability. As a result, it proves to be extremely difficult to implement a predictive and reliable physics-based model. The present study attempts to leverage an existing non validated numerical model to reconstruct information on unobserved degrees of freedom (dofs) based on the results of modal tests. An expansion method is proposed based on the concept of the constitutive relation error (CRE). This method leads to minimization of an energy-based functional that takes into account both errors in the model and in the test data. Due to lack of knowledge, commonplace in this kind of complex system, the expansion will be presented in the framework of robust approach. More precisely, the first objective of this article is to assess the robustness of the mode shape expansion in presence of large epistemic uncertainties that are represented as info-gap models. Secondly, a strategy will be presented to maximize the robustness of the expansion by appropriately selecting the model decision variables for a given horizon of uncertainty. The proposed methodology is illustrated on a simple academic test case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Detailed descriptions of these methods are out-of-scope of the paper.

  2. 2.

    In practice, the Guyan stiffness matrix is often used.

  3. 3.

    In the case of large number of dofs, Metis renumbering method available in MD Nastran®; permits to minimize the decomposition CPU-time.

References

  1. Pascual R, Golinval JC, Razeto M (1998) On the reliability of error localization indicators. In: Proceedings of the ISMA23, Leuven, Belgium, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corus M, Balmès E (2003) Improvement of a structural modification method using data expansion and model reduction techniques. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXI, Kissimee, Florida (USA), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pascual RJ (1999) Model based structural damage assessment using vibration measurements. PhD thesis, Université de Liège

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balmès E (2000) Review and evaluation of shape expansion methods. In: Proceedings of IMAC XVIII: A Conference on Structural Dynamics. vol 4062, San Antonio, Texas (USA), pp 555–561

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (1993) Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey. J Sound Vib 167(2):347–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kidder R (1973) Reduction of structural frequency equations. AIAA J 11(6):892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guyan RJ (1964) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J 3:380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Callahan JC (1989) A procedure for an improved reduced system (IRS) model. In: Proceedings of IMAC VII, Las Vegas, Nevada (USA), pp 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Callahan JC, Avitabile P, Riemer R (1989) System equivalent reduction expansion process (SEREP). In: Proceedings of IMAC VII, Las Vegas, Nevada (USA), pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Balmès E (1999) Sensors, degrees of freedom and generalized mode expansion methods. In: Proceedings of IMAC XVII, Kissimee, Florida (USA), pp 628–634

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ladevèze P, Leguillon D (1983) Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and applications. SIAM J Numer Anal 20(3):485–509

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Reynier M, Ladeveze P, Feuardent V (1998) Selective error location indicators for mass and stiffness updating. In: Tanaka M, Dulikravich GS (eds) Inverse problems in engineering mechanics, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 291–298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben-Haim Y, Hemez FM (2011) Robustness, fidelity and prediction-looseness of models. Proc R Soc A 468:227–244

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemez F, Ben-Haim Y (2004) Info-gap robustness for the correlation of tests and simulations of a non-linear transient. Mech Syst Signal Pr 18:1443–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pereiro D, Cogan S, Sadoulet-Reboul E, Martinez F (2013) Robust model calibration with load uncertainties. In: Topics in model validation and uncertainty quantification. Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series 41, vol 5. Springer, pp 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deraemaeker A, Ladevèze P, Leconte P (2002) Reduced bases for model updating in structural dynamics based on constitutive relation error. Comput Method Appl M 191:2427–2444

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Feissel P, Allix O (2007) Modified constitutive relation error identification strategy for transient dynamics with corrupted data: the elastic case. Comput Method Appl M 196:1968–1983

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Banerjee B, Walsh TF, Aquino W, Bonnet M (2013) Large scale parameter estimation problems in frequency-domain elastodynamics using an error in constitutive equation functional. Comput Method Appl M 253:60–72

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ben-Haim Y (2006) Information-gap theory: decisions under severe uncertainty, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kuczkowiak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuczkowiak, A., Cogan, S., Ouisse, M., Foltête, E., Corus, M. (2014). Robust Expansion of Experimental Mode Shapes Under Epistemic Uncertainties. In: Atamturktur, H., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C., Schoenherr, T. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04552-8_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04552-8_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04551-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04552-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics