Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bariatric Surgery Data Management and Reporting Worldwide

  • Chapter
Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

  • 3079 Accesses

Abstract

The prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing globally. The total number of bariatric procedures being performed worldwide has increased exponentially. There is an increasing need to develop strategies for effective data collection and analysis to provide benchmarks for surgical outcomes and reassurance for patients. Clinical registries serve as a portal that can facilitate this process.

In this chapter, we discuss the importance of clinical registry and how a registry can be set up. We review the pitfalls in registry-based data and the lessons learnt from previous or historical bariatric registries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Noe L, Larson L, Trotter J. Utilizing patient registries to support health economics research: integrating observational data with economic analyses, models, and other applications. ISPOR CONNECTIONS. 2005;11(5). Available from: http://www.ispor.org/news/articles/oct05/patient_registr.asp.

  3. Hickey GL, Grant SW, Cosgriff R, Dimarakis I, Pagano D, Kappetein AP, et al. Clinical registries: governance, management, analysis and applications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(4):605–14. Epub 2013/02/02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Normand SL, Shewan CM, et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: Part 2—implementation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(3 Suppl):S12–23. Epub 2011/09/01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason EE, Renquist KE, Zhang W, IBSR Data Contributors. Trends in bariatric surgery, 1986–2001. Obes Surg. 2003;13:225. (Abstract) Poster presentation at the ASBS Convention; Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mason EE, Tang S, Renquist KE, Barnes DT, Cullen JJ, Doherty C, et al. A decade of change in obesity surgery. National Bariatric Surgery Registry (NBSR) contributors. Obes Surg. 1997;7(3):189–97. Epub 1997/06/01.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, Yunus T, Boone KB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):516–25. Epub 2011/02/22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, Brennan L, Brown WA. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94. Epub 2012/12/14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36. Epub 2013/01/23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:30. Epub 2007/07/05.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox NS, Brennan JS, Chasen ST. Clinical estimation of fetal weight and the Hawthorne effect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;141(2):111–4. Epub 2008/09/06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landsberger HA. Hawthorne revisited: management and the worker, its critics, and developments in human relations in industry. Ithaca: Cornell University; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, Hawasli A, English WJ, Genaw J, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–42. Epub 2010/07/29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morino M, Toppino M, Forestieri P, Angrisani L, Allaix ME, Scopinaro N. Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1002–7; discussion 7–9. Epub 2007/11/29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Welbourn R, Fiennes A, Kinsman R, Walton P. First Registry Report to March 2010. National Bariatric Surgery Registry. 2010. Available from: http://www.e-dendrite.com/publishing/reports/Gastrointestinal/79.

  16. Directive 95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Studies in health technology and informatics. 1996;27:83–118. Epub 1995/12/09.

    Google Scholar 

  17. He S, Ganzinger M, Knaup P. The intellectual property management for data sharing in a German liver cancer research network. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:891–5. Epub 2012/08/10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Welke KF, Ferguson Jr TB, Coombs LP, Dokholyan RS, Murray CJ, Schrader MA, et al. Validity of the society of thoracic surgeons national adult cardiac surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(4):1137–9. Epub 2004/04/06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Heijden GJ, Donders AR, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1102–9. Epub 2006/09/19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. American College of Surgeons. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. 2012. Available from: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip.

  21. Keogh B. Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) breast implants: final report of the Expert Group. Department of Health, NHS Medical Directorate. 2012. Available from: http://www.nvpc.nl/uploads/stand/NVPC120618DOC-MO-dh_134627_NHS_rapport_siliconen_in_PIP_implantaten_niet_schadelijk109.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Upper GI & Minimally Invasive Unit, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

    Rishi Singhal MD, FRCS

  2. Department of Upper GI & Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK

    Richard Welbourn FRCS

Authors
  1. Rishi Singhal MD, FRCS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Welbourn FRCS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Singhal MD, FRCS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Homerton University Hospital, London, United Kingdom

    Sanjay Agrawal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singhal, R., Welbourn, R. (2016). Bariatric Surgery Data Management and Reporting Worldwide. In: Agrawal, S. (eds) Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04343-2_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04343-2_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04342-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04343-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation