Abstract
This chapter aims at providing a critical reflection about the relation between smart city and neoliberal urban governance. In the current economic scenario of crisis and austerity, smart city policy is representing an attempt to attract and coopt private actors in the provision of urban services, opening new critical issues on urban neoliberalism and welfare. The hypothesis is that the smart city policy may be interpreted as a mobile technology (recalling Aihwa Ong’s definition) of governance circulating in cities across Europe. As a consequence of neoliberalism and economic crisis, local governments are more and more in charge of providing urban services, whereas the smart city paradigm is offering new areas of economic profitability for private companies promoting technological solutions. This process implies the development of new urban governance, where the smart city policy offers technological solutions, political responses and moral justifications that are socially and politically quite pervasive. According to this perspective, there is a great need for critical and global analysis, questioning the appropriateness of any smart city project in the context of its application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
http://smartercitieschallenge.org/scc/executive_reports/SCC-Copenhagen-Report.pdf (accessed June 2014)
- 2.
http://amsterdamsmartcity.com (accessed June 2014)
- 3.
http://www.smartcityexpo.com (accessed April 2014); see also http://www.wired.com/2011/02/st_riogondola (accessed April 2014).
- 4.
Communication from the Commission ‘Smart Cities and Communities—European Innovation Partnership’, COM(2012)4701 http://ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/ (accessed January 2014).
- 5.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population 2012: Wallchart, www.unpopulation.org (Accessed January 2014).
- 6.
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm (Accessed January 2014).
References
Allwinkle, S., & Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 1–16.
Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 385–399.
Arun, M. (1999). Smart cities: The Singapore case. Cities, 16(1), 13–18.
Arun, M., & Yap, M. T. (2000). Singapore: The development of an intelligent island and social dividends of information technology. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1749–1756.
Beatley, T., & Collins, R. (2000). Smart growth and beyond: Transitioning to a sustainable society. Virginia Enviromental Law Journal, 19(3), 287–322.
Bell, S. (2011). System city: Urban amplification and inefficient engineering. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban constellations (pp. 72–74.). Berlin: Jovis.
Brand, P. (2007). Green subjection: The politics of neoliberal urban environmental management. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(3), 616–632.
Brandon, P. S., & Lombardi, P. (2005). Evaluating sustainable development in the built environment. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.
Brooker, D. (2012). ‘Build it and they will come’? A critical examination of utopian planning practices and their socio-spatial impacts in Malaysia’s intelligent city. Asian Geographer, 29(1), 39–56.
Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world. London: Routledge.
Catney, P., & Doyle, T. (2011). The welfare of now and the green (post)politics of the future. Critical Social Policy, 31(2), 174–193.
Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1654–1674.
Collier, S. J. (2006). Global assemblages. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 399–401.
Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–21.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Davis, M. (2010). Who will build the ark? New Left Review, 61, 29–46.
Deakin, M. (2010). SCRAN: The smart cities (inter) regional academic network supporting the development of a trans-national comparator for the standardisation of egovernment services. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative e-government: An examination of e-government across countries (pp. 425–446.). Berlin: Springer.
Deakin, M., Lombardi, P., & Cooper, I. (2011). The IntelCities community of practice: The capacity-building, co-design, evaluation and monitoring of e-Gov services. The Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 17–38.
European Union. (2007). Territorial agenda of the european union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, 24–25 May; http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu. Accessed Dec 2013.
Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 223–237.
Ezkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University, industry and government. London: Routledge.
Falconer Al Hindi, K., & Till, K. (Eds.). (2001). Special issue: The new urbanism and neotraditional town planning. Urban Geography, 22(3), 189–286.
Felli, R., & Castree, N. (2012). Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: Foresight or foreclosure? Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 1–4.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna UT: Centre of Regional Science. http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gordon, I. (2005). Integrating cities. In N. Nuck, I. Gordon, A. Harding & I. Turok (Eds.), Changing cities. rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance (pp. 78–93.). Basingstoke: Palmgrave.
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1998). The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime and representation. Chicheste: John Wiley.
Harvey, D. (1989a). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (1989b). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1), 3–17.
Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009). Urban ecological security: A new urban paradigm. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 193–215.
Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.
Jessop, B. (1997). The entrepreneurial city: Re-imagining localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital. In N. Jewson & S. MacGregor (Eds.), Transforming cities: Contested governance and new spatial divisions (pp. 28–41.). London: Routledge.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.
Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. London: Routledge.
Krueger, R., & Gibbs, D. (2009). ‘Third wave’ sustainability? Smart growth and regional development in the USA. Regional Studies, 42(9), 1263–1274.
Lefebvre, H. (1968) Le droit a la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., Sziarto, K., & Maringanti, A. (2007). Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism. urban frontiers (pp. 1–25.). London: The Guilford Press.
Lombardi, P. (2011). Managing the green It agenda. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(1), 8–10.
Lombardi, P., Cooper, I., Paskaleva, K., & Deakin, M. (2009). The challenge of designing user-centric e-services: European dimensions. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: comparative studies. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012a). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149.
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Deakin, M., Nijkamp, P., et al. (2012b). An advanced triple-helix network model for smart cities performance. In Y. Ozge (Ed.), Green and ecological technologies for urban planning: creating smart cities (pp. 59–73.). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2014) Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies, doi: 10.1177/0969776414554488.
Marinetto, M. (2003). Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement. Sociology, 37(1), 103–120.
Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P. I., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432.
McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here. Technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don’t exists. London: Allen Lane.
Newman, P., Beatley, T., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities. Responding to peak oil and climate change. Washington: Island Press.
OECD. (2002). Urban renaissance: Glasgow: Lessons for innovation and implementation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Olds, K., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2004). Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 489–521.
Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.
Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1999). Governing cities: Notes on the spatialisation of virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(6), 737–760.
Paroutis, S., Bennett, M., & Heracleous, L. (2013). A strategic view on smart city technology: The case of IBM smarter cities during a recession. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1(89), 262–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041. Accessed March 2014.
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.
Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.
Prince, R. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 188–203.
Raco, M., & Flint, J. (2012). Introduction: Characterising the ‘new’ politics of sustainability: From managing growth to coping with crisis. In J. Flint & M. Raco (Eds.), The future of sustainable cities. Radical reflections (pp. 3–27.). Bristol: Policy Press.
Rossi, U., & Vanolo, A. (2012). Urban political geographies. A global perspective. London: Sage.
Söderström, O., Paasche, T., & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 18(3), 307–320.
Summerville, J. A., Adkins, B. A., & Kendall, G. (2008). Community participation, rights and responsibilities. The governmentality of sustainable development policies. Environment and Planning C, 26(4), 696–711.
Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition. In R. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The sustainable development paradox. Urban political economy in the United States and Europe (pp. 13–40.). New York: Gilford Press.
Swyngedouw, E. (2013). Apocalypse now! Fear and doomsday pleasures. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 24(1), 9–18.
Tonkiss, F. (2011). Template urbanism. City, 15(5), 584–588.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011). UNEP year book 2011: Emerging issues in our global environment, UNEP Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2011/pdfs/UNEP_YEARBOOK_Fullreport.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (2005). The resilient city. How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vanolo, A. (2010). European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: Shadows of neoliberalism. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1301–1315.
Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 881–896.
While, A., Jonas, A., & Gibbs, D. (2010). From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 76–93.
Whitehead, M. (2012). The sustainable city: An obituary? On the future form and prospects of sustainable urbanism. In J. Flint & M. Raco (Eds.), The future of sustainable cities. Radical reflections (pp. 29–46.). Bristol: Policy Press.
World Bank. (1991). Urban policy and economic development: An agenda for the 1990s. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2000). Cities in transition: World bank urban and local government strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2008). The world bank annual report 2008. Year in Review. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTANNREP2K8/Resources/YR00_Year_in_Review_English.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
Žižek, S. (2008) Nature and its discontents. SubStance, 37(3), 37–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lombardi, P., Vanolo, A. (2015). Smart City as a Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives on Urban Development Policies. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. (eds) Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03167-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03167-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03166-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03167-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)