Skip to main content

Smart City as a Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives on Urban Development Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 8))

Abstract

This chapter aims at providing a critical reflection about the relation between smart city and neoliberal urban governance. In the current economic scenario of crisis and austerity, smart city policy is representing an attempt to attract and coopt private actors in the provision of urban services, opening new critical issues on urban neoliberalism and welfare. The hypothesis is that the smart city policy may be interpreted as a mobile technology (recalling Aihwa Ong’s definition) of governance circulating in cities across Europe. As a consequence of neoliberalism and economic crisis, local governments are more and more in charge of providing urban services, whereas the smart city paradigm is offering new areas of economic profitability for private companies promoting technological solutions. This process implies the development of new urban governance, where the smart city policy offers technological solutions, political responses and moral justifications that are socially and politically quite pervasive. According to this perspective, there is a great need for critical and global analysis, questioning the appropriateness of any smart city project in the context of its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://smartercitieschallenge.org/scc/executive_reports/SCC-Copenhagen-Report.pdf (accessed June 2014)

  2. 2.

    http://amsterdamsmartcity.com (accessed June 2014)

  3. 3.

    http://www.smartcityexpo.com (accessed April 2014); see also http://www.wired.com/2011/02/st_riogondola (accessed April 2014).

  4. 4.

    Communication from the Commission ‘Smart Cities and Communities—European Innovation Partnership’, COM(2012)4701 http://ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/ (accessed January 2014).

  5. 5.

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population 2012: Wallchart, www.unpopulation.org (Accessed January 2014).

  6. 6.

    http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm (Accessed January 2014).

References

  • Allwinkle, S., & Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arun, M. (1999). Smart cities: The Singapore case. Cities, 16(1), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arun, M., & Yap, M. T. (2000). Singapore: The development of an intelligent island and social dividends of information technology. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1749–1756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T., & Collins, R. (2000). Smart growth and beyond: Transitioning to a sustainable society. Virginia Enviromental Law Journal, 19(3), 287–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2011). System city: Urban amplification and inefficient engineering. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban constellations (pp. 72–74.). Berlin: Jovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, P. (2007). Green subjection: The politics of neoliberal urban environmental management. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(3), 616–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, P. S., & Lombardi, P. (2005). Evaluating sustainable development in the built environment. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, D. (2012). ‘Build it and they will come’? A critical examination of utopian planning practices and their socio-spatial impacts in Malaysia’s intelligent city. Asian Geographer, 29(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catney, P., & Doyle, T. (2011). The welfare of now and the green (post)politics of the future. Critical Social Policy, 31(2), 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1654–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. J. (2006). Global assemblages. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 399–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–21.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2010). Who will build the ark? New Left Review, 61, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M. (2010). SCRAN: The smart cities (inter) regional academic network supporting the development of a trans-national comparator for the standardisation of egovernment services. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative e-government: An examination of e-government across countries (pp. 425–446.). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M., Lombardi, P., & Cooper, I. (2011). The IntelCities community of practice: The capacity-building, co-design, evaluation and monitoring of e-Gov services. The Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2007). Territorial agenda of the european union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, 24–25 May; http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu. Accessed Dec 2013.

  • Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University, industry and government. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer Al Hindi, K., & Till, K. (Eds.). (2001). Special issue: The new urbanism and neotraditional town planning. Urban Geography, 22(3), 189–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felli, R., & Castree, N. (2012). Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: Foresight or foreclosure? Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna UT: Centre of Regional Science. http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I. (2005). Integrating cities. In N. Nuck, I. Gordon, A. Harding & I. Turok (Eds.), Changing cities. rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance (pp. 78–93.). Basingstoke: Palmgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1998). The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime and representation. Chicheste: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989a). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989b). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009). Urban ecological security: A new urban paradigm. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997). The entrepreneurial city: Re-imagining localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital. In N. Jewson & S. MacGregor (Eds.), Transforming cities: Contested governance and new spatial divisions (pp. 28–41.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R., & Gibbs, D. (2009). ‘Third wave’ sustainability? Smart growth and regional development in the USA. Regional Studies, 42(9), 1263–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1968) Le droit a la ville. Paris: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., Sziarto, K., & Maringanti, A. (2007). Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism. urban frontiers (pp. 1–25.). London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, P. (2011). Managing the green It agenda. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(1), 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, P., Cooper, I., Paskaleva, K., & Deakin, M. (2009). The challenge of designing user-centric e-services: European dimensions. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: comparative studies. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012a). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Deakin, M., Nijkamp, P., et al. (2012b). An advanced triple-helix network model for smart cities performance. In Y. Ozge (Ed.), Green and ecological technologies for urban planning: creating smart cities (pp. 59–73.). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2014) Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies, doi: 10.1177/0969776414554488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinetto, M. (2003). Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement. Sociology, 37(1), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P. I., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here. Technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don’t exists. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., Beatley, T., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities. Responding to peak oil and climate change. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Urban renaissance: Glasgow: Lessons for innovation and implementation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, K., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2004). Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 489–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1999). Governing cities: Notes on the spatialisation of virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(6), 737–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis, S., Bennett, M., & Heracleous, L. (2013). A strategic view on smart city technology: The case of IBM smarter cities during a recession. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1(89), 262–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041. Accessed March 2014.

  • Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, R. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M., & Flint, J. (2012). Introduction: Characterising the ‘new’ politics of sustainability: From managing growth to coping with crisis. In J. Flint & M. Raco (Eds.), The future of sustainable cities. Radical reflections (pp. 3–27.). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, U., & Vanolo, A. (2012). Urban political geographies. A global perspective. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O., Paasche, T., & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 18(3), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville, J. A., Adkins, B. A., & Kendall, G. (2008). Community participation, rights and responsibilities. The governmentality of sustainable development policies. Environment and Planning C, 26(4), 696–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition. In R. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The sustainable development paradox. Urban political economy in the United States and Europe (pp. 13–40.). New York: Gilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2013). Apocalypse now! Fear and doomsday pleasures. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 24(1), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss, F. (2011). Template urbanism. City, 15(5), 584–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011). UNEP year book 2011: Emerging issues in our global environment, UNEP Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2011/pdfs/UNEP_YEARBOOK_Fullreport.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (2005). The resilient city. How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanolo, A. (2010). European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: Shadows of neoliberalism. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1301–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 881–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • While, A., Jonas, A., & Gibbs, D. (2010). From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M. (2012). The sustainable city: An obituary? On the future form and prospects of sustainable urbanism. In J. Flint & M. Raco (Eds.), The future of sustainable cities. Radical reflections (pp. 29–46.). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1991). Urban policy and economic development: An agenda for the 1990s. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). Cities in transition: World bank urban and local government strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). The world bank annual report 2008. Year in Review. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTANNREP2K8/Resources/YR00_Year_in_Review_English.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Žižek, S. (2008) Nature and its discontents. SubStance, 37(3), 37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Lombardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lombardi, P., Vanolo, A. (2015). Smart City as a Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives on Urban Development Policies. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. (eds) Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03167-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics